☰

Nancy B. Carlisle - Publications

Affiliations: 
Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 
Tree Info Grants Similar researchers Related pubs Distance to... Nearest Nobel PubMed Report error

34 high-probability publications. We are testing a new system for linking publications to authors. You can help! If you notice any inaccuracies, please sign in and mark papers as correct or incorrect matches. If you identify any major omissions or other inaccuracies in the publication list, please let us know.

Year Citation  Score
2024 Liesefeld HR, Lamy D, Gaspelin N, Geng JJ, Kerzel D, Schall JD, Allen HA, Anderson BA, Boettcher S, Busch NA, Carlisle NB, Colonius H, Draschkow D, Egeth H, Leber AB, et al. Terms of debate: Consensus definitions to guide the scientific discourse on visual distraction. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics. PMID 38177944 DOI: 10.3758/s13414-023-02820-3  0.433
2023 Chidharom M, Carlisle NB. Neurophysiological Measures of Proactive and Reactive Control in Negative Template Use. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 1-12. PMID 37052508 DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_01996  0.334
2022 Zhang Z, Carlisle NB. Assessing recoding accounts of negative attentional templates using behavior and eye tracking. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition. PMID 36548091 DOI: 10.1037/xlm0001183  0.341
2022 Carlisle NB. Negative and positive templates: Two forms of cued attentional control. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics. PMID 36348265 DOI: 10.3758/s13414-022-02590-4  0.442
2022 Zhang Z, Sahatdjian R, Carlisle NB. Benefits from negative templates in easy and difficult search depend on rapid distractor rejection and enhanced guidance. Vision Research. 197: 108031. PMID 35462088 DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2022.108031  0.356
2020 Rajsic J, Carlisle NB, Woodman GF. What not to look for: Electrophysiological evidence that searchers prefer positive templates. Neuropsychologia. 107376. PMID 32032582 DOI: 10.1167/19.10.234A  0.666
2019 Carlisle NB, Woodman GF. Quantifying the Attentional Impact of Working Memory Matching Targets and Distractors. Visual Cognition. 27: 452-466. PMID 32952433 DOI: 10.1080/13506285.2019.1634172  0.783
2019 Zhang Z, Gapelin N, Carlisle NB. Probing early attention following negative and positive templates. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics. PMID 31650519 DOI: 10.3758/s13414-019-01864-8  0.434
2019 Geng JJ, Won B, Carlisle NB. Distractor Ignoring: Strategies, Learning, and Passive Filtering Current Directions in Psychological Science. 28: 600-606. DOI: 10.1177/0963721419867099  0.374
2019 Carlisle NB, Zhang Z. Eye tracking supports active attentional suppression from negative templates Journal of Vision. 19: 53d. DOI: 10.1167/19.10.53d  0.344
2019 Zhang Z, Gaspelin N, Carlisle NB. Probing the early attentional benefits of negative templates Journal of Vision. 19: 315. DOI: 10.1167/19.10.315  0.395
2019 Carlisle NB, Nitka AW. Location-based explanations do not account for active attentional suppression Visual Cognition. 27: 305-316. DOI: 10.1080/13506285.2018.1553222  0.407
2018 Carlisle N. Active Attentional Suppression Cannot Be Explained by Recoding to a Positive Template Journal of Vision. 18: 309. DOI: 10.1167/18.10.309  0.393
2017 Carlisle NB, Kristjánsson Á. How visual working memory contents influence priming of visual attention. Psychological Research. PMID 28405777 DOI: 10.1007/s00426-017-0866-6  0.687
2016 Grubert A, Carlisle N, Eimer M. The Control of Single-color and Multiple-color Visual Search by Attentional Templates in Working Memory and in Long-term Memory. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 1-17. PMID 27458746 DOI: 10.1162/Jocn_A_01020  0.602
2015 Judah MR, Grant DM, Carlisle NB. The effects of self-focus on attentional biases in social anxiety:An ERP study. Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience. PMID 26676918 DOI: 10.3758/S13415-015-0398-8  0.345
2015 Carlisle N, Nitka A. Controlled Attentional Suppression. Journal of Vision. 15: 230. PMID 26325918 DOI: 10.1167/15.12.230  0.398
2014 Reinhart RM, Carlisle NB, Woodman GF. Visual working memory gives up attentional control early in learning: ruling out interhemispheric cancellation. Psychophysiology. 51: 800-4. PMID 24708027 DOI: 10.1111/Psyp.12217  0.773
2014 Carlisle N, Luck S. Working Memory Guidance of Attention: Examining the Accessory State Proposal Journal of Vision. 14: 644-644. DOI: 10.1167/14.10.644  0.613
2013 Carlisle NB, Woodman GF. Reconciling conflicting electrophysiological findings on the guidance of attention by working memory. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics. 75: 1330-5. PMID 23918552 DOI: 10.3758/s13414-013-0529-7  0.788
2013 Woodman GF, Carlisle NB, Reinhart RM. Where do we store the memory representations that guide attention? Journal of Vision. 13. PMID 23444390 DOI: 10.1167/13.3.1  0.793
2013 Williams M, Hong SW, Kang MS, Carlisle NB, Woodman GF. The benefit of forgetting. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 20: 348-55. PMID 23208769 DOI: 10.3758/S13423-012-0354-3  0.793
2013 Carlisle N, Hahn BH, Robinson B, Gold J, Luck S. The Multiple Change Detection Approach to Estimating Visual Working Memory Capacity Journal of Vision. 13: 1350-1350. DOI: 10.1167/13.9.1350  0.677
2012 Arita JT, Carlisle NB, Woodman GF. Templates for rejection: configuring attention to ignore task-irrelevant features. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance. 38: 580-4. PMID 22468723 DOI: 10.1037/a0027885  0.648
2012 Reinhart RM, Carlisle NB, Kang MS, Woodman GF. Event-related potentials elicited by errors during the stop-signal task. II: human effector-specific error responses. Journal of Neurophysiology. 107: 2794-807. PMID 22357790 DOI: 10.1152/Jn.00803.2011  0.694
2012 Carlisle N, Woodman G. The guidance of attention is dominated by task relevance and not simply maintenance in working memory Journal of Vision. 12: 953-953. DOI: 10.1167/12.9.953  0.748
2012 Leonard CJ, Carlisle NB, Luck SJ. Comparing the resolution of a working memory-based target template with the resolution of visual working memory itself Journal of Vision. 12: 567-567. DOI: 10.1167/12.9.567  0.725
2011 Carlisle NB, Arita JT, Pardo D, Woodman GF. Attentional templates in visual working memory. The Journal of Neuroscience : the Official Journal of the Society For Neuroscience. 31: 9315-22. PMID 21697381 DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1097-11.2011  0.785
2011 Carlisle NB, Woodman GF. When memory is not enough: electrophysiological evidence for goal-dependent use of working memory representations in guiding visual attention. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 23: 2650-64. PMID 21254796 DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2011.21602  0.793
2011 Carlisle NB, Woodman GF. Automatic and strategic effects in the guidance of attention by working memory representations. Acta Psychologica. 137: 217-25. PMID 20643386 DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.06.012  0.783
2011 Carlisle N, Woodman G. Measuring the handoff of the attentional template from working memory to long-term memory Journal of Vision. 11: 1297-1297. DOI: 10.1167/11.11.1297  0.736
2010 Carlisle N, Woodman G. Working memory guidance of attention depends on memory's relevance for search Journal of Vision. 9: 180-180. DOI: 10.1167/9.8.180  0.653
2010 Carlisle N, Boucher L, Woodman G. Strategic interactions between visual working memory and perceptual attention as revealed by eye movements Journal of Vision. 8: 861-861. DOI: 10.1167/8.6.861  0.716
2010 Carlisle NB, Woodman GF. Do Visual Working Memory Representations Automatically Bias Deployments of Covert Attention? Journal of Vision. 10: 320-320. DOI: 10.1167/10.7.320  0.776
Show low-probability matches.