Area:
Industrial Psychology, General, Social Psychology
We are testing a new system for linking grants to scientists.
The funding information displayed below comes from the
NIH Research Portfolio Online Reporting Tools and the
NSF Award Database.
The grant data on this page is limited to grants awarded in the United States and is thus partial. It can nonetheless be used to understand how funding patterns influence mentorship networks and vice-versa, which has deep implications on how research is done.
You can help! If you notice any innacuracies, please
sign in and mark grants as correct or incorrect matches.
Sign in to see low-probability grants and correct any errors in linkage between grants and researchers.
High-probability grants
According to our matching algorithm, Miles L. Patterson is the likely recipient of the following grants.
Years |
Recipients |
Code |
Title / Keywords |
Matching score |
1987 — 1988 |
Patterson, Miles L |
R01Activity Code Description: To support a discrete, specified, circumscribed project to be performed by the named investigator(s) in an area representing his or her specific interest and competencies. |
Intimacy and Social Control in Nonverbal Exchange @ University of Missouri-St. Louis
The purpose of the proposed research is the testing of different key aspects of the functional model of nonverbal exchange (Patterson, 1982). The basic focus is the predicted contrast between the intimacy and social control functions of nonverbal involvement. These functions will be examined in interactions in which expectancies about the subject's goals in an interaction will be varied. Specifically, it is predicted that when the subject expects a casual, informal interaction, the subject's nonverbal involvement with that partner will be determined more by the spontaneous affect (intimacy) toward the partner. In contrast, when a subject expects to create a favorable impression on the partner, the subject's nonverbal involvement with that partner will be determined more by the purposeful goal (social control) of creating a good impression. In the case of the intimacy function, there should be consistency between interpersonal affect and nonverbal involvement. That is, the more positively the subject views the partner, the greater should be the subject's level of nonverbal involvement. In contrast, in the case of the social control function, there will be relative independence between interpersonal affect and nonverbal involvement. That is, the subject's level of nonverbal involvement will be determined more by achieving the desired reaction from the partner than by the subject's affect toward the partner. The proposed research will examine not only the consequences of different expectancies on nonverbal involvement, but also the cognitive and physiological reactions that are presumed to mediate those expectancies. Such a multivariate approach should contribute to a better understanding of nonverbal exchange and the factors that mediate that exchange. Because nonverbal behavior is so important for understanding a interaction processes, this research is relevant for a wide range of basic and applied issues.
|
0.993 |