Anne E. Cook, Ph.D.

Affiliations: 
2000 University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH, United States 
Google:
"Anne Cook"
Mean distance: 19.65 (cluster 8)
 
SNBCP

Parents

Sign in to add mentor
Edward J. O'Brien grad student 2000 UNH
 (The Moses Illusion in reading comprehension.)
BETA: Related publications

Publications

You can help our author matching system! If you notice any publications incorrectly attributed to this author, please sign in and mark matches as correct or incorrect.

Creer SD, Cook AE, O'Brien EJ. (2019) Can readers fully adopt the perspective of the protagonist? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (2006). 1747021819891407
Walsh EK, Cook AE, O'Brien EJ. (2018) Processing real-world violations embedded within a fantasy-world narrative. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (2006). 71: 2282-2294
Creer SD, Cook AE, O'Brien EJ. (2018) Author accepted manuscript: Taking the Perspective of the Narrator. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (2006). 1747021818779496
Williams CR, Cook AE, O'Brien EJ. (2018) Validating semantic illusions: Competition between context and general world knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition
Guéraud S, Walsh EK, Cook AE, et al. (2018) Validating information during reading: the effect of recency Journal of Research in Reading. 41: S85-S101
Creer SD, Cook AE, O’Brien EJ. (2018) Competing Activation During Fantasy Text Comprehension Scientific Studies of Reading. 22: 308-320
Cook AE, O'Brien EJ. (2017) Fundamentals of inferencing during reading Language and Linguistics Compass. 11: e12246
Cook AE, Walsh EK, Bills MA, et al. (2016) Validation of Semantic Illusions Independent of Anomaly Detection: Evidence from Eye Movements. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (2006). 1-34
Wei W, Cook AE. (2016) Semantic Size and Contextual Congruency Effects During Reading: Evidence From Eye Movements Discourse Processes. 53: 415-429
O'Brien EJ, Cook AE. (2016) Coherence Threshold and the Continuity of Processing: The RI-Val Model of Comprehension Discourse Processes. 53: 326-338
See more...