Area:
Learning and Memory, auditory cortex, amygdala, neuro-imaging.
We are testing a new system for linking grants to scientists.
The funding information displayed below comes from the
NIH Research Portfolio Online Reporting Tools and the
NSF Award Database.
The grant data on this page is limited to grants awarded in the United States and is thus partial. It can nonetheless be used to understand how funding patterns influence mentorship networks and vice-versa, which has deep implications on how research is done.
You can help! If you notice any innacuracies, please
sign in and mark grants as correct or incorrect matches.
Sign in to see low-probability grants and correct any errors in linkage between grants and researchers.
High-probability grants
According to our matching algorithm, Amy Poremba is the likely recipient of the following grants.
Years |
Recipients |
Code |
Title / Keywords |
Matching score |
2002 |
Poremba, Amy |
R03Activity Code Description: To provide research support specifically limited in time and amount for studies in categorical program areas. Small grants provide flexibility for initiating studies which are generally for preliminary short-term projects and are non-renewable. |
Neural Substrates of Learning
Many things that humans and animals learn everyday are predicated on a simple association between two events. Humans learn to avoid hot stoves; a doorbell ringing indicates visitors, and cats learning to approach to the sound of the can opener in the anticipation of receiving food are just a few examples. These events are brought into the neural system by 5 main modality specific pathways, visual, auditory, somatosensory, olfactory and gustatory. Each one of these modalities records very different stimuli and has a unique neural input system. Does learning across different modalities require the same number of neural circuits as types of input? Perhaps there are centrally located neural circuits depending on the type of global information being processed rather than on the individual sensory modality? If similar motor responses were to be learned the same neural learning circuit might be used. The behavioral parameters of simple associative, i.e., classical conditioning, where one stimulus predicts the occurrence of another stimulus, have been well worked out. The neural substrates underlying two specific types of classical conditioning, eyeblink and fear conditioning to tone stimuli, have been verified from input to output with the use of lesion, anatomical tracing and neuronal recording studies. Eyeblink conditioning is similar to limb flexion conditioning. How similar are the neuronal learning circuits for similar types of classical conditioning when using cues from the sample modality? When using cues from different modalities, do these different inputs converge on a common circuit for classical conditioning of a particular motor response? The aim of the proposed research is two-fold: First, map the neural substrates, through measurement of glucose energy metabolism across the whole brain, for a simple classical conditioning paradigm, limb flexion using the commonly used pure tone stimulus. The results will be compared to the known circuitry for eyeblink conditioning. Second, map the neural substrates of this classical conditioned reflex using cues from additional modalities using visual and somatosensory stimuli. Many humans have difficulty learning solely by presentations made in one sensory modality or another. This type of research may allow for the identification of the specific brain regions where these types of deficits are modified.
|
1 |
2007 — 2011 |
Poremba, Amy |
R01Activity Code Description: To support a discrete, specified, circumscribed project to be performed by the named investigator(s) in an area representing his or her specific interest and competencies. |
Auditory Cortical Areas For Encoding and Memory
[unreadable] DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant): Communication is of major importance to our survival and yet we do not understand how the brain encodes this information. Moreover, much of human communication and language is predicated on learning simple auditory associations. Investigating non-human primate communication and learning can provide a template for the neural precursors of language. A guiding theme of this proposal is that a testable neural model of communication, including auditory learning, memory, and object identification, will emerge most readily from focused, detailed investigations of individual neurons and their perceptual and behavioral correlates. It was found recently that the cortex of the monkey's left temporal pole in the superior temporal gyrus is specialized for processing species-specific monkey vocalizations and this lateralization of communication sounds is similar to humans. The mechanism for hemispheric specialization in this case is suppression of the right hemisphere via the corpus callosum. Building on this finding, the selectivity of auditory neurons within the temporal pole to various sound stimuli, including monkey vocalizations, will be determined. Next, we will elucidate whether auditory responsive neurons within the temporal pole respond differentially to spatial auditory information and map their location. We will also determine if the temporal pole neurons are encoding conceptual learning and delay memory. These experiments are essential to describe the role of the temporal pole in communication. Specific hypothesis concerning the neural encoding of auditory information will be tested in awake monkeys using single unit electrodes implanted in the temporal pole. All together, the experiments proposed here address basic issues in auditory processing that have not been systematically explored. It is expected that a more thorough understanding of the monkey auditory system will provide useful insights into the neural substrates and mechanisms of human communication and into the causes and treatment of learning disabilities and communicative disorders. [unreadable] [unreadable] [unreadable]
|
1 |