We are testing a new system for linking grants to scientists.
The funding information displayed below comes from the
NIH Research Portfolio Online Reporting Tools and the
NSF Award Database.
The grant data on this page is limited to grants awarded in the United States and is thus partial. It can nonetheless be used to understand how funding patterns influence mentorship networks and vice-versa, which has deep implications on how research is done.
You can help! If you notice any innacuracies, please
sign in and mark grants as correct or incorrect matches.
Sign in to see low-probability grants and correct any errors in linkage between grants and researchers.
High-probability grants
According to our matching algorithm, Owen Jones is the likely recipient of the following grants.
Years |
Recipients |
Code |
Title / Keywords |
Matching score |
1998 — 1999 |
Strouse, Daniel Jones, Owen |
N/AActivity Code Description: No activity code was retrieved: click on the grant title for more information |
Colloquium On Biology and Aggression: Investigating Theories, Data and Implications For Law @ Arizona State University
The prevalence of human aggression across and within the sexes poses difficult challenges for law and society. Reducing this aggression and enhancing victims' autonomy are legal goals with widespread public support. This colloquium is designed to bring together in a common forum, leading biological researchers, legal and sociolegal scholars to explore the insights biological science has that may be useful to legal scholars. Those participants expert in the strengths and limitations of biological theories of intraspecies aggression will report on and discuss predictions derived from an evolutionary perspective and suggest promising next steps in research. Legal scholars specifically interested in sexual aggression will share with other participants the latest legal scholarship on this issue. All participants will evaluate the current state of research in both biology and law and generate ideas for future research and articulate the implications (should there be any) of the evolutionary perspective for the law. In addition to advancing research opportunities, the participants will explicate the limits of biologically based thinking for sociolegal research and the possible misuses of biological insights by the legal system. %%% The prevalence of human aggression across and within the sexes poses difficult challenges for law and society. Reducing this aggression and enhancing victims' autonomy are legal goals with widespread public support. This colloquium is designed to bring together in a common forum, leading biological researchers, legal and sociolegal scholars to explore the insights biological science has that may be useful to legal scholars. Those participants expert in the strengths and limitations of biological theories of intraspecies aggression will report on and discuss predictions derived from an evolutionary perspective and suggest promising next steps in research. Legal scholars specifically interested in sexual aggression will share with other participants the latest legal scholarship on this issue. All participants will evaluate the current state of research in both biology and law and generate ideas for future research and articulate the implications (should there be any) of the evolutionary perspective for the law. In addition to advancing research opportunities, the participants will explicate the limits of biologically based thinking for sociolegal research and the possible misuses of biological insights by the legal system.
|
0.91 |