Area:
Clinical Psychology
We are testing a new system for linking grants to scientists.
The funding information displayed below comes from the
NIH Research Portfolio Online Reporting Tools and the
NSF Award Database.
The grant data on this page is limited to grants awarded in the United States and is thus partial. It can nonetheless be used to understand how funding patterns influence mentorship networks and vice-versa, which has deep implications on how research is done.
You can help! If you notice any innacuracies, please
sign in and mark grants as correct or incorrect matches.
Sign in to see low-probability grants and correct any errors in linkage between grants and researchers.
High-probability grants
According to our matching algorithm, Suzanne T. Gurland is the likely recipient of the following grants.
| Years |
Recipients |
Code |
Title / Keywords |
Matching
score |
| 2001 — 2002 |
Gurland, Suzanne T |
F31Activity Code Description:
To provide predoctoral individuals with supervised research training in specified health and health-related areas leading toward the research degree (e.g., Ph.D.). |
Testing a New Model of Rapport With Children @ Clark University (Worcester, Ma)
DESCRIPTION (adapted from investigator?s abstract): The focus of the candidate?s research is the construct of rapport. Rapport is known to be an important part of every type of clinical encounter, yet little is known about the development of rapport with children. Broadly construed, the project aims to improve the quality of services provided to children by advancing and testing a model of rapport that can help professionals build better relationships with their pediatric clients and patients. The project includes two studies. The first study involves administering a questionnaire to children to identify their common expectations of adults? behavior. The second study aims to evaluate the effects of autonomy support and the violation of expectations both on children?s reports of rapport after interacting with an adult in a simulated psychological assessment situation, and on children?s motivations to engage in assessment activities. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of four conditions in a 2 x 2 design that crosses autonomy support versus control with violation versus nonviolation of expectations. Children will then participate in a simulated psychological assessment with an adult, after which rapport and motivation will be measured.
|
1 |