
cached image
We are testing a new system for linking grants to scientists.
The funding information displayed below comes from the
NIH Research Portfolio Online Reporting Tools and the
NSF Award Database.
The grant data on this page is limited to grants awarded in the United States and is thus partial. It can nonetheless be used to understand how funding patterns influence mentorship networks and vice-versa, which has deep implications on how research is done.
You can help! If you notice any innacuracies, please
sign in and mark grants as correct or incorrect matches.
Sign in to see low-probability grants and correct any errors in linkage between grants and researchers.
High-probability grants
According to our matching algorithm, Richard A. Shweder is the likely recipient of the following grants.
Years |
Recipients |
Code |
Title / Keywords |
Matching score |
1980 — 1982 |
Shweder, Richard |
N/AActivity Code Description: No activity code was retrieved: click on the grant title for more information |
Doctoral Dissertation Research in Anthropology |
0.915 |
1986 — 1988 |
Shweder, Richard |
R01Activity Code Description: To support a discrete, specified, circumscribed project to be performed by the named investigator(s) in an area representing his or her specific interest and competencies. |
The Development of Conscience, Guilt, and Morality
There are three major theories about the nature and ontogenetic origins of moral codes; moral universalism, moral developmentalism and moral relativism. The three theories differ dramatically in what they have to say about a) the presence or absence of conscience, guilt and the superego at different ages and in different cultures; b) the rational vs. arbitrary foundations of judgments about what's a vice and what's a virtue; and c) the extent to which moral codes are either products of socialization or examples of self-constructed knowledge. The goal of the proposed research is to determine what's universal, what's relative and what develops in moral codes. This will be done a) by documenting the presence or absence of the moral sentiment at different ages in India and the United States; b) by examining the rational and non-rational ideas underlying the moral codes of children and adults in those two cultures; and c) by assessing the role of socialization processes in the ontogeny of moral understandings. Focusing on household sets, the proposal describes a cross-cultural developmental design for identifying points of agreement and disagreement in the moral codes of children (ages 4-6, 8-10, 12-14) and adults in India and the United States. India and the United States have been selected for comparison because their cultural traditions radically contrast in ways directly relevant to the study of superego formation and the origins of self. The proposal describes a series of methods for investigating moral codes including iterative ethnographic interviewing and the sociolinguistic analysis of accusations and excuses in "situations of accountability." The project traces the origins in children of the sentiments and understandings that distinguish normal conscience ridden functioning from the functioning of the clinical psychopath.
|
0.915 |
1997 — 2006 |
Shweder, Richard |
T32Activity Code Description: To enable institutions to make National Research Service Awards to individuals selected by them for predoctoral and postdoctoral research training in specified shortage areas. |
Culture and Mental Health Behavior Training Program |
0.915 |
2009 — 2011 |
Shweder, Richard Hickman, Jacob (co-PI) [⬀] |
N/AActivity Code Description: No activity code was retrieved: click on the grant title for more information |
Doctoral Dissertation Improvement Grant: Morality and Personhood in the Hmong Diaspora: a Person-Centered Ethnographic Approach
University of Chicago doctoral student, Jacob Hickman, with the guidance of Dr. Richard A. Shweder, will investigate how immigrants' cultural models interact with both individual subjective experience and the competing models of the majority groups in resettlement contexts. The focus of the research will be beliefs of morality and personhood held by Laotian Hmong who have immigrated to Thailand and to the United States. The researcher will compare these different resettlement communities in order to understand how daily living, cultural practices, and interactions with institutions in Thailand and the United States shape immigrants' beliefs about morality and personhood. Morality and personhood were chosen as domains for this ethnographic comparison because of their fundamental importance for understanding oneself and one's relationships with others.
Taking advantage of the natural experiment afforded by having immigrants from one place settle in two different countries, the researcher will undertake nine months of fieldwork in Thailand and nine months in the United States. Using a person-centered research methodology, he will conduct person-centered interviews, undertake continuous ethnographic observation, and carry out a systematic survey of one community in each research site. Interviews and observations will focus on intra-familial intergenerational comparisons, in order to gauge how changes in personhood and morality differ across two generations that have entered the different resettlement contexts at different points in the life course.
This project is significant because it will illuminate the processes of change that migrants experience from resettling in different social contexts, including interactions with both formal and informal institutions. The analysis of a group that originated in one location and migrated to two distinct locations for more or less random reasons constitutes a unique comparative framework for investigating how people both react to and are shaped by their social and cultural milieu. This knowledge will offer a better understanding of the nature of "assimilation," a social, economic, and political concern for receiving countries. The research also supports the education of a social scientist.
|
0.915 |