Parents
Sign in to add mentor| David Lubinski | grad student | 2005 | Vanderbilt | |
| (Trait constellations in intellectually able adolescents: Distinct preference patterns and educational choices at contrasting levels of spatial ability.) | ||||
BETA: Related publications
See more...
Publications
|
You can help our author matching system! If you notice any publications incorrectly attributed to this author, please sign in and mark matches as correct or incorrect. |
| Rogers CB, Martz DM, Webb RM, et al. (2017) Everyone else is doing it (I think): The power of perception in fat talk. Body Image. 20: 116-119 |
| Fiery MF, Martz DM, Webb RM, et al. (2016) A preliminary investigation of racial differences in body talk in age-diverse U.S. adults. Eating Behaviors. 21: 232-5 |
| Maphis LE, Martz DM, Bergman SS, et al. (2013) Body size dissatisfaction and avoidance behavior: how gender, age, ethnicity, and relative clothing size predict what some won't try. Body Image. 10: 361-8 |
| Bleske‐Rechek A, Zeug N, Webb RM. (2007) Discrepant performance on multiple‐choice and short answer assessments and the relation of performance to general scholastic aptitude Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 32: 89-105 |
| Webb RM, Lubinski D, Benbow CP. (2007) Spatial ability: A neglected dimension in talent searches for intellectually precocious youth Journal of Educational Psychology. 99: 397-420 |
| Lubinski D, Benbow CP, Webb RM, et al. (2006) Tracking exceptional human capital over two decades. Psychological Science. 17: 194-9 |
| Webb RM, Lubinski D, Benbow CP. (2002) Mathematically facile adolescents with math-science aspirations: New perspectives on their educational and vocational development. Journal of Educational Psychology. 94: 785-794 |
| Webb RM, Lubinski D, Benbow CP. (2002) Mathematically facile adolescents with math-science aspirations: New perspectives on their educational and vocational development Journal of Educational Psychology. 94: 785-794 |
| Lubinski D, Webb RM, Morelock MJ, et al. (2001) Top 1 in 10,000: a 10-year follow-up of the profoundly gifted. The Journal of Applied Psychology. 86: 718-29 |