Dena M. Gromet, Ph.D.
Affiliations: | 2009 | Princeton University, Princeton, NJ |
Area:
Social PsychologyGoogle:
"Dena Gromet"Mean distance: 18.82 (cluster 8) | S | N | B | C | P |
Parents
Sign in to add mentor| John M. Darley | grad student | 2009 | Princeton | |
| (Restoration and retribution: People's negotiation of multiple responses to wrongdoing.) | ||||
BETA: Related publications
See more...
Publications
|
You can help our author matching system! If you notice any publications incorrectly attributed to this author, please sign in and mark matches as correct or incorrect. |
| Gromet DM, Goodwin GP, Goodman RA. (2016) Pleasure From Another's Pain: The Influence of a Target's Hedonic States on Attributions of Immorality and Evil. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin |
| Goodwin GP, Gromet DM. (2014) Punishment. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews. Cognitive Science. 5: 561-72 |
| Gromet DM, Okimoto TG. (2014) Back into the fold: The influence of offender amends and victim forgiveness on peer reintegration Business Ethics Quarterly. 24: 411-441 |
| Gromet DM, Okimoto TG, Wenzel M, et al. (2012) A victim-centered approach to justice? Victim satisfaction effects on third-party punishments. Law and Human Behavior. 36: 375-89 |
| Gromet DM, Darley JM. (2011) Political Ideology and Reactions to Crime Victims: Preferences for Restorative and Punitive Responses Journal of Empirical Legal Studies. 8: 830-855 |
| Gromet DM, Darley JM. (2009) Punishment and beyond: Achieving justice through the satisfaction of multiple goals Law and Society Review. 43: 1-38 |
| Gromet DM, Pronin E. (2009) What were you worried about? Actors' concerns about revealing fears and insecurities relative to observers' reactions Self and Identity. 8: 342-364 |
| Gromet DM, Darley JM. (2009) Retributive and restorative justice: Importance of crime severity and shared identity in people's justice responses Australian Journal of Psychology. 61: 50-57 |
| Gromet DM, Darley JM. (2006) Restoration and retribution: How including retributive components affects the acceptability of restorative justice procedures Social Justice Research. 19: 395-432 |