Kurt Akeley
Affiliations: | Microsoft Research, Redmond, WA, United States |
Area:
computer graphicsGoogle:
"Kurt Akeley"Mean distance: 15.58 (cluster 23) | S | N | B | C | P |
Parents
Sign in to add mentorPatrick M. Hanrahan | grad student | 2004 | Stanford (E-Tree) | |
(Achieving near-correct focus cues using multiple image planes.) | ||||
Martin Banks | grad student | 2003-2005 | UC Berkeley |
BETA: Related publications
See more...
Publications
You can help our author matching system! If you notice any publications incorrectly attributed to this author, please sign in and mark matches as correct or incorrect. |
Ravikumar S, Akeley K, Banks MS. (2011) Creating effective focus cues in multi-plane 3D displays. Optics Express. 19: 20940-52 |
Sugerman J, Fatahalian K, Boulos S, et al. (2009) GRAMPS: A programming model for graphics pipelines Acm Transactions On Graphics. 28 |
Banks MS, Akeley K, Hoffman DM, et al. (2008) Consequences of Incorrect Focus Cues in Stereo Displays. Journal of the Society For Information Display. 24: 7 |
Hoffman DM, Girshick AR, Akeley K, et al. (2008) Vergence-accommodation conflicts hinder visual performance and cause visual fatigue. Journal of Vision. 8: 33.1-30 |
Watt SJ, Akeley K, Ernst MO, et al. (2005) Focus cues affect perceived depth. Journal of Vision. 5: 834-62 |
Watt SJ, Akeley K, Girshick AR, et al. (2005) Achieving near-correct focus cues in a 3-D display using multiple image planes Proceedings of Spie - the International Society For Optical Engineering. 5666: 393-401 |
Watt SJ, Akeley K, Banks MS. (2004) Using multiple image planes to achieve near-correct focus cues in a 3d display Journal of Vision. 4: 463-463 |
Akeley K, Watt SJ, Girshick AR, et al. (2004) A stereo display prototype with multiple focal distances Acm Siggraph 2004 Papers, Siggraph 2004. 804-813 |
Akeley K, Watt SJ, Girshick AR, et al. (2004) A stereo display prototype with multiple focal distances Acm Transactions On Graphics. 23: 804-813 |
Watt SJ, Akeley K, Banks MS. (2003) Focus cues to display distance affect perceived depth from disparity Journal of Vision. 3: 66a |