cached image

Barbara J. Gillam

The University of New South Wales, Australia 
Vision, Psychophysics
"Barbara Gillam"
Mean distance: 16.67 (cluster 23)
Cross-listing: PsychTree


Sign in to add mentor
Gavin N. Seagrim grad student 1964 ANU
Joseph Zubin post-doc Columbia
Clarence Graham research scientist 1970 Columbia
 (Graham, C. H., & Gillam, B. J. (1970). Occurrence of theoretically correct responses during rotation of the Ames window. Perception & Psychophysics, 8, 257-260.doi:10.3758/BF03212587)
BETA: Related publications


You can help our author matching system! If you notice any publications incorrectly attributed to this author, please sign in and mark matches as correct or incorrect.

Gillam B, Marlow PJ. (2014) Comparing subjective contours for Kanizsa squares and linear edge alignments (‘New York Titanic’ figures) Perception. 43: 977-988
Wardle SG, Palmisano S, Gillam BJ. (2014) Monocular and binocular edges enhance the perception of stereoscopic slant. Vision Research. 100: 113-23
Gillam BJ, Wardle SG, Vecellio E. (2014) Orientation contrast and entropy contrast in the genesis of subjective contours along thin lines. Perception. 43: 7-22
Gillam BJ, Wardle SG. (2013) A mid-level explanation for the venetian blind effect. Frontiers in Psychology. 4: 908
Wardle SG, Gillam BJ. (2013) Color constrains depth in da Vinci stereopsis for camouflage but not occlusion. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance. 39: 1525-40
Wardle SG, Gillam BJ. (2013) Phantom surfaces in da Vinci stereopsis. Journal of Vision. 13: 16
Gillam B, Vecellio E. (2012) Subjective contours along truncated letters Perception. 41: 831-839
Spang K, Gillam B, Fahle M. (2012) Electrophysiological correlates of binocular stereo depth without binocular disparities. Plos One. 7: e40562
Marlow P, Gillam BJ. (2011) Stereopsis loses dominance over relative size as target separation increases. Perception. 40: 1413-27
Gillam B, Palmisano SA, Govan DG. (2011) Depth interval estimates from motion parallax and binocular disparity beyond interaction space. Perception. 40: 39-49
See more...