Children
Sign in to add trainee| Joseph H. Danks | grad student | (Neurotree) | |
| Uri Hasson | grad student | Princeton (Neurotree) | |
| Boaz Keysar | grad student | Princeton | |
| Michael McCloskey | grad student | 1978 | Princeton (Neurotree) |
| Roger J. Kreuz | grad student | 1983-1987 | Princeton |
| Zachary C. Estes | grad student | 2001 | Princeton |
| Catrinel Haught | grad student | 2005 | Princeton |
| Susanna T. Reynolds | grad student | 2005 | Princeton |
BETA: Related publications
See more...
Publications
|
You can help our author matching system! If you notice any publications incorrectly attributed to this author, please sign in and mark matches as correct or incorrect. |
| Prasada S, Khemlani S, Leslie SJ, et al. (2013) Conceptual distinctions amongst generics. Cognition. 126: 405-22 |
| Glucksberg S, Danks JH. (2013) Experimental psycholinguistics: An introduction: Psychology library editions: Psycholinguistics Experimental Psycholinguistics: An Introduction: Psychology Library Editions: Psycholinguistics. 3: 1-233 |
| Rubio-Fernández P, Glucksberg S. (2013) False-belief reasoning and bilingualism Access Science |
| Khemlani S, Leslie SJ, Glucksberg S. (2012) Inferences about members of kinds: The generics hypothesis Language and Cognitive Processes. 27: 887-900 |
| Glucksberg S, Haught C. (2006) Can Florida become like the next Florida? When metaphoric comparisons fail. Psychological Science. 17: 935-8 |
| Hasson U, Glucksberg S. (2006) Does understanding negation entail affirmation?. An examination of negated metaphors Journal of Pragmatics. 38: 1015-1032 |
| Glucksberg S. (2004) Dialogue: Can two be cheaper than one? The Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 27: 199 |
| Glucksberg S. (2003) The psycholinguistics of metaphor. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 7: 92-96 |
| Glucksberg S, Newsome MR, Goldvarg Y. (2001) Inhibition of the Literal: Filtering Metaphor-Irrelevant Information During Metaphor Comprehension Metaphor and Symbol. 16: 277-293 |
| Estes Z, Glucksberg S. (2000) Similarity and attribution in concept combination: reply to Wisniewski Memory & Cognition. 28: 39-40 |