Rachel Barkan

Affiliations: 
Ben Gurion University, Safed, North District, Israel 
Area:
decision making
Google:
"Rachel Barkan"
Mean distance: 16.64 (cluster 50)
 
BETA: Related publications

Publications

You can help our author matching system! If you notice any publications incorrectly attributed to this author, please sign in and mark matches as correct or incorrect.

Teodorescu K, Plonsky O, Ayal S, et al. (2021) Frequency of enforcement is more important than the severity of punishment in reducing violation behaviors. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 118
Rilke RM, Schurr A, Barkan R, et al. (2016) One-by-One or All-at-Once? Self-Reporting Policies and Dishonesty. Frontiers in Psychology. 7: 113
Ayal S, Gino F, Barkan R, et al. (2015) Three Principles to REVISE People's Unethical Behavior. Perspectives On Psychological Science : a Journal of the Association For Psychological Science. 10: 738-41
Barkan R, Ayal S, Gino F, et al. (2012) The pot calling the kettle black: distancing response to ethical dissonance. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General. 141: 757-73
Danziger S, Montal R, Barkan R. (2012) Idealistic advice and pragmatic choice: a psychological distance account. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 102: 1105-17
Busemeyer JR, Barkan R, Mehta S, et al. (2007) Context effects and models of preferential choice: implications for consumer behavior Marketing Theory. 7: 39-58
Busemeyer JR, Townsend JT, Diederich A, et al. (2005) Contrast effects or loss aversion? Comment on Usher and McClelland (2004). Psychological Review. 112: 253-5
Barkan R, Danziger S, Ben-Bashat G, et al. (2005) Framing reference points: The effect of integration and segregation on dynamic inconsistency Journal of Behavioral Decision Making. 18: 213-226
Barkan R, Erev I, Zinger E, et al. (2004) Tip policy, visibility and quality of service in cafés Tourism Economics. 10: 449-462
Barkan R, Busemeyer JR. (2003) Modeling Dynamic Inconsistency with a Changing Reference Point Journal of Behavioral Decision Making. 16: 235-255
See more...