Janet Sigal

Affiliations: 
Fairleigh Dickinson University, Teaneck, NJ, United States 
Area:
Social Psychology; Cross-cultural Studies of Perceptions of Domestic Abuse
Google:
"Janet Sigal"
Mean distance: 8905.5
 
Cross-listing: PsychTree

BETA: Related publications

Publications

You can help our author matching system! If you notice any publications incorrectly attributed to this author, please sign in and mark matches as correct or incorrect.

Sigal J. (2006) International sexual harassment. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 1087: 356-69
Sigal J, Gibbs MS, Goodrich C, et al. (2005) Cross-cultural reactions to academic sexual harassment: Effects of individualist vs. collectivist culture and gender of participants Sex Roles. 52: 201-215
Braden-Maguire J, Sigal J, Perrino CS. (2005) Battered women who kill: Variables affecting simulated jurors' verdicts Journal of Family Violence. 20: 403-408
Sigal J, Braden-Maguire J, Patt I, et al. (2003) Effects of type of coping response, setting, and social context on reactions to sexual harassment Sex Roles. 48: 157-166
Sigal J, Jacobsen H. (1999) A cross-cultural exploration of factors affecting reactions to sexual harassment: Attitudes and Policies Psychology, Public Policy, and Law. 5: 760-785
Gibbs M, Sigal J, Friedman CR, et al. (1995) Factors affecting credibility in a simulated sexual harassment hearing. Violence Against Women. 1: 366-79
Gibbs MS, Sigal J, Adams B, et al. (1989) Cross‐examination of the expert witness: Do hostile tactics affect impressions of a simulated jury? Behavioral Sciences & the Law. 7: 275-281
Sigal J, Hsu L, Foodim S, et al. (1988) Factors Affecting Perceptions of Political Candidates Accused of Sexual and Financial Misconduct Political Psychology. 9: 273-280
Sigal J, Gibbs M, Adams B, et al. (1988) The effect of romantic and nonromantic films on perception of female friendly and seductive behavior Sex Roles. 19: 545-554
Alter-Reid K, Gibbs MS, Lachenmeyer JR, et al. (1986) Sexual abuse of children: A review of the empirical findings Clinical Psychology Review. 6: 249-266
See more...