cached image

Robert G. Crowder

Yale University, New Haven, CT 
Learning & Memory
"Robert Crowder"
Mean distance: 15.24 (cluster 15)
Cross-listing: PsychTree


Sign in to add trainee
Robert L. Greene grad student Yale (PsychTree)
James S. Nairne grad student Pudue University
James H. Neely grad student Yale
Mark A. Pitt grad student Yale
Henry L. Roediger, III grad student
Ian Neath grad student 1989-1991 Yale
Aimee M. Surprenant grad student 1988-1992 Yale
BETA: Related publications


You can help our author matching system! If you notice any publications incorrectly attributed to this author, please sign in and mark matches as correct or incorrect.

Marks AR, Crowder RG. (1997) Temporal distinctiveness and modality. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 23: 164-80
Crowder RG, Wenk HE. (1997) Glenberg's embodied memory: Less than meets the eye Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 20: 21-22
Neath I, Crowder RG. (1996) Distinctiveness and very short-term serial position effects. Memory (Hove, England). 4: 225-42
Crowder RG, Neath I. (1995) The Influence of Pitch on Time Perception in Short Melodies Music Perception. 12: 379-386
Surprenant AM, Pitt MA, Crowder RG. (1993) Auditory recency in immediate memory. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. a, Human Experimental Psychology. 46: 193-223
Speer SR, Crowder RG, Thomas LM. (1993) Prosodic Structure and Sentence Recognition Journal of Memory and Language. 32: 336-358
Neath I, Surprenant AM, Crowder RG. (1993) The Context-Dependent Stimulus Suffix Effect Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 19: 698-703
Pitt MA, Crowder RG. (1992) The role of spectral and dynamic cues in imagery for musical timbre. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance. 18: 728-38
Crowder RG, Reznick JS, Rosenkrantz SL. (1991) Perception of the major/minor distinction: V. Preferences among infants Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society. 29: 187-188
Banaji MR, Crowder RG. (1991) Some Everyday Thoughts on Ecologically Valid Methods American Psychologist. 46: 78-79
See more...