Franklin J. Boster
Affiliations: | Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI |
Area:
Social PsychologyGoogle:
"Franklin Boster"Mean distance: 106866
BETA: Related publications
See more...
Publications
|
You can help our author matching system! If you notice any publications incorrectly attributed to this author, please sign in and mark matches as correct or incorrect. |
| Manata B, Boster FJ, Wittenbaum GM, et al. (2019) Assessing the Effects of Partisan Bias at the Group Level of Analysis: A Hidden Profile Experiment American Politics Research. 47: 1283-1302 |
| Keating DM, Boster FJ. (2019) Nonlinear Unidimensionality in Communication Science: Tests, Examples, and Implications Communication Research Reports. 36: 67-77 |
| Boster FJ, Liu RW, Cheng Y, et al. (2018) The Suasory Force of Sticky Messages: An Application to the Application of Sunscreen Communication Studies. 69: 1-19 |
| Boster FJ, Liu RW, Poorisat T, et al. (2016) Communicating to Influence Perceptions of Social Stigma: Implications for the Use of Signs by the Homeless as a Means of Soliciting Funds American Behavioral Scientist. 60: 1293-1305 |
| Carpenter CJ, Boster FJ, Kotowski M, et al. (2015) Evidence for the Validity of a Social Connectedness Scale: Connectors Amass Bridging Social Capital Online and Offline Communication Quarterly. 63: 119-134 |
| Russell J, Boster FJ. (2014) Measuring the Locus of Causality as a Means of Generating Explanations for the Legitimization of Paltry Favors Effect Canadian Social Science. 10: 9-14 |
| Boster FJ, Shaw AZ, Carpenter CJ, et al. (2014) Simulation of a Dynamic Theory of Reasoned Action Simulation and Gaming. 45: 699-731 |
| Shulman HC, Boster FJ. (2014) Effect of Test-Taking Venue and Response Format on Political Knowledge Tests Communication Methods and Measures. 8: 177-189 |
| Carpenter CJ, Boster FJ. (2013) The Relationship Between Message Recall and Persuasion: More Complex Than It Seems Journal of Communication. 63: 661-681 |
| Carpenter CJ, Boster FJ. (2013) Modeling the Effects of Processing Effort and Ability in Response to Persuasive Message Arguments Communication Quarterly. 61: 413-430 |