Janell Fetterolf

Affiliations: 
2016 Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Brunswick, NJ, United States 
Google:
"Janell Fetterolf"
Mean distance: (not calculated yet)
 
BETA: Related publications

Publications

You can help our author matching system! If you notice any publications incorrectly attributed to this author, please sign in and mark matches as correct or incorrect.

Freedman G, Fetterolf JC, Beer JS. (2018) Engaging in social rejection may be riskier for women. The Journal of Social Psychology. 1-17
Chaney KE, Rudman LA, Fetterolf JC, et al. (2017) Paying a Price for Domestic Equality: Risk Factors for Backlash Against Nontraditional Husbands Gender Issues. 36: 3-22
Fetterolf JC, Rudman LA. (2016) Exposure to Sexual Economics Theory Promotes a Hostile View of Heterosexual Relationships Psychology of Women Quarterly. 41: 77-88
Rudman LA, Glick P, Marquardt T, et al. (2016) When Women are Urged to have Casual Sex More than Men are: Perceived Risk Moderates the Sexual Advice Double Standard Sex Roles. 77: 409-418
Rudman LA, Fetterolf JC. (2015) Why Sexual Economics Theory Is Patriarchal: Reply to Vohs and Baumeister's (2015) Comment on Rudman and Fetterolf (2014). Psychological Science. 26: 1524-5
Fetterolf JC, Sanchez DT. (2015) The costs and benefits of perceived sexual agency for men and women. Archives of Sexual Behavior. 44: 961-70
Rudman LA, Fetterolf JC. (2014) Gender and sexual economics: do women view sex as a female commodity? Psychological Science. 25: 1438-47
Rudman LA, Fetterolf JC. (2014) How accurate are metaperceptions of sexism? Evidence for the illusion of antagonism between hostile and benevolent sexism Group Processes and Intergroup Relations. 17: 275-285
Fetterolf JC, Rudman LA. (2014) Gender Inequality in the Home: The Role of Relative Income, Support for Traditional Gender Roles, and Perceived Entitlement Gender Issues. 31: 219-237
Rudman LA, Fetterolf JC, Sanchez DT. (2013) What motivates the sexual double standard? More support for male versus female control theory. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin. 39: 250-63
See more...