Judith Holler

Affiliations: 
Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen, Gelderland, Netherlands 
Google:
"Judith Holler"
Mean distance: (not calculated yet)
 
BETA: Related publications

Publications

You can help our author matching system! If you notice any publications incorrectly attributed to this author, please sign in and mark matches as correct or incorrect.

Trujillo JP, Holler J. (2023) Interactionally Embedded Gestalt Principles of Multimodal Human Communication. Perspectives On Psychological Science : a Journal of the Association For Psychological Science. 17456916221141422
Eijk L, Rasenberg M, Arnese F, et al. (2022) The CABB dataset: A multimodal corpus of communicative interactions for behavioural and neural analyses. Neuroimage. 119734
Drijvers L, Holler J. (2022) The multimodal facilitation effect in human communication. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
Trujillo JP, Levinson SC, Holler J. (2022) A multi-scale investigation of the human communication system's response to visual disruption. Royal Society Open Science. 9: 211489
Trujillo JP, Holler J. (2021) The Kinematics of Social Action: Visual Signals Provide Cues for What Interlocutors Do in Conversation. Brain Sciences. 11
Trujillo J, Özyürek A, Holler J, et al. (2021) Speakers exhibit a multimodal Lombard effect in noise. Scientific Reports. 11: 16721
Humphries S, Holler J, Crawford T, et al. (2021) Cospeech gestures are a window into the effects of Parkinson's disease on action representations. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General
Schubotz L, Holler J, Drijvers L, et al. (2020) Aging and working memory modulate the ability to benefit from visible speech and iconic gestures during speech-in-noise comprehension Psychological Research-Psychologische Forschung. 1-15
Macuch Silva V, Holler J, Ozyurek A, et al. (2020) Multimodality and the origin of a novel communication system in face-to-face interaction. Royal Society Open Science. 7: 182056
Bosker HR, Peeters D, Holler J. (2020) How visual cues to speech rate influence speech perception. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (2006). 73: 1523-1536
See more...