Xenia Schmalz
Affiliations: | University of Munich, München, Bayern, Germany |
Google:
"Xenia Schmalz"Mean distance: (not calculated yet)
Collaborators
Sign in to add collaboratorBarbara Treccani | collaborator | University of Munich, Germany |
BETA: Related publications
See more...
Publications
You can help our author matching system! If you notice any publications incorrectly attributed to this author, please sign in and mark matches as correct or incorrect. |
Schmalz X, Mulatti C, Schulte-Körne G, et al. (2022) Effects of complexity and unpredictability on the learning of an artificial orthography. Cortex; a Journal Devoted to the Study of the Nervous System and Behavior. 152: 1-20 |
Schmalz X, Treccani B, Mulatti C. (2021) Developmental Dyslexia, Reading Acquisition, and Statistical Learning: A Sceptic's Guide. Brain Sciences. 11 |
De Simone E, Beyersmann E, Mulatti C, et al. (2021) Order among chaos: Cross-linguistic differences and developmental trajectories in pseudoword reading aloud using pronunciation Entropy. Plos One. 16: e0251629 |
Schmalz X, Schulte-Körne G, de Simone E, et al. (2021) What Do Artificial Orthography Learning Tasks Actually Measure? Correlations Within and Across Tasks. Journal of Cognition. 4: 7 |
Schmalz X, Robidoux S, Castles A, et al. (2020) Variations in the use of simple and context-sensitive grapheme-phoneme correspondences in English and German developing readers. Annals of Dyslexia |
Schmalz X, Moll K, Mulatti C, et al. (2018) Is Statistical Learning Ability Related to Reading Ability, and If So, Why? Scientific Studies of Reading. 23: 64-76 |
Schmalz X, Altoè G, Mulatti C. (2017) Statistical learning and dyslexia: a systematic review. Annals of Dyslexia. 67: 147-162 |
Schmalz X, Robidoux S, Castles A, et al. (2017) German and English Bodies: No Evidence for Cross-Linguistic Differences in Preferred Orthographic Grain Size Collabra: Psychology. 3: 5 |
Schmalz X, Mulatti C. (2017) Busting a myth with the Bayes Factor The Mental Lexicon. 12: 263-282 |
Schmalz X, Beyersmann E, Cavalli E, et al. (2016) Unpredictability and complexity of print-to-speech correspondences increase reliance on lexical processes: more evidence for the orthographic depth hypothesis Journal of Cognitive Psychology. 28: 658-672 |