Curt Anthony Carlson
Affiliations: | 2008 | Psychology | University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, United States |
Google:
"Curt Carlson"Mean distance: 17.63 (cluster 15) | S | N | B | C | P |
Parents
Sign in to add mentor| Scott D. Gronlund | grad student | 2008 | University of Oklahoma | |
| (Distinctiveness in an eyewitness identification paradigm: Comparing simultaneous and sequential lineups.) | ||||
Children
Sign in to add trainee| Alyssa R. Jones | grad student | 2015-2021 | Texas A&M University-Commerce (PsychTree) |
BETA: Related publications
See more...
Publications
|
You can help our author matching system! If you notice any publications incorrectly attributed to this author, please sign in and mark matches as correct or incorrect. |
| Carlson CA, Hemby JA, Wooten AR, et al. (2021) Testing encoding specificity and the diagnostic feature-detection theory of eyewitness identification, with implications for showups, lineups, and partially disguised perpetrators. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications. 6: 14 |
| Weatherford DR, Meltzer MA, Carlson CA, et al. (2020) Never forget a face: Verbalization facilitates recollection as evidenced by flexible responding to contrasting recognition memory tests. Memory & Cognition |
| Jones AR, Carlson CA, Lockamyeir RF, et al. (2020) “All I remember is the black eye.” A distinctive facial feature harms eyewitness identification Applied Cognitive Psychology |
| Lockamyeir RF, Carlson CA, Jones AR, et al. (2020) The effect of viewing distance on empirical discriminability and the confidence–accuracy relationship for eyewitness identification Applied Cognitive Psychology. 34: 1047-1060 |
| Wooten AR, Carlson CA, Lockamyeir RF, et al. (2020) The number of fillers may not matter as long as they all match the description: The effect of simultaneous lineup size on eyewitness identification Applied Cognitive Psychology. 34: 590-604 |
| Carlson CA, Jones AR, Whittington JE, et al. (2019) Lineup fairness: propitious heterogeneity and the diagnostic feature-detection hypothesis. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications. 4: 2 |
| Whittington JE, Carlson CA, Carlson MA, et al. (2019) Asking an eyewitness to predict their later lineup performance could harm the confidence–accuracy relationship Applied Cognitive Psychology. 34: 119-131 |
| Carlson CA, Jones AR, Goodsell CA, et al. (2019) A method for increasing empirical discriminability and eliminating top‐row preference in photo arrays Applied Cognitive Psychology. 33: 1091-1102 |
| Carlson CA, Jones AR. (2017) An Abbreviated Festschrift: Expert Analysis of David Marr’s Early Works Psyccritiques. 62 |
| Mickes L, Seale-Carlisle TM, Wetmore SA, et al. (2017) ROCs in Eyewitness Identification: Instructions versus Confidence Ratings Applied Cognitive Psychology. 31: 467-477 |