Year |
Citation |
Score |
2024 |
Lackey ACR, Scordato ESC, Keagy J, Tinghitella RM, Heathcote RJP. The role of mate competition in speciation and divergence: a systematic review. Journal of Evolutionary Biology. PMID 39276025 DOI: 10.1093/jeb/voae111 |
0.381 |
|
2024 |
Keagy J, Hofmann HA, Boughman JW. Mate choice in the brain: species differ in how male traits 'turn on' gene expression in female brains. Proceedings. Biological Sciences. 291: 20240121. PMID 39079663 DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2024.0121 |
0.453 |
|
2019 |
Bell AM, Trapp R, Keagy J. Correction to 'Parenting behaviour is highly heritable in male stickleback'. Royal Society Open Science. 6: 191372. PMID 31543979 DOI: 10.1098/Rsos.191372 |
0.363 |
|
2019 |
Keagy J, Minter R, Tinghitella RM. Sex differences in cognition and their relationship to male mate choice. Current Zoology. 65: 285-293. PMID 31263487 DOI: 10.1093/Cz/Zoz014 |
0.55 |
|
2018 |
Keagy J, Braithwaite VA, Boughman JW. Brain differences in ecologically differentiated sticklebacks. Current Zoology. 64: 243-250. PMID 30402065 DOI: 10.1093/Cz/Zox074 |
0.334 |
|
2018 |
Bell AM, Trapp R, Keagy J. Parenting behaviour is highly heritable in male stickleback. Royal Society Open Science. 5: 171029. PMID 29410816 DOI: 10.1098/Rsos.171029 |
0.351 |
|
2017 |
Minter R, Keagy J, Tinghitella RM. The relationship between male sexual signals, cognitive performance, and mating success in stickleback fish. Ecology and Evolution. 7: 5621-5631. PMID 28808542 DOI: 10.1002/Ece3.3091 |
0.5 |
|
2017 |
Tinghitella RM, Lackey ACR, Martin M, Dijkstra PD, Drury JP, Heathcote R, Keagy J, Scordato ESC, Tyers AM. On the role of male competition in speciation: a review and research agenda Behavioral Ecology. 29: 783-797. DOI: 10.1093/Beheco/Arx151 |
0.511 |
|
2016 |
Keagy J, Lettieri L, Boughman JW. Male competition fitness landscapes predict both forward and reverse speciation. Ecology Letters. 19: 71-80. PMID 26612568 DOI: 10.1111/Ele.12544 |
0.512 |
|
2016 |
Keagy J, Hosler LC, Borgia G. Female active sampling of male paint on bowers predicts female uncertainty in mate choice Animal Behaviour. 116: 131-137. DOI: 10.1016/J.Anbehav.2016.03.017 |
0.667 |
|
2012 |
Borgia G, Coyle BJ, Keagy J. Comment on "Illusions promote mating success in great bowerbirds". Science (New York, N.Y.). 337: 292; author reply 29. PMID 22822134 DOI: 10.1126/Science.1220775 |
0.663 |
|
2012 |
Keagy J, Savard JF, Borgia G. Cognitive ability and the evolution of multiple behavioral display traits Behavioral Ecology. 23: 448-456. DOI: 10.1093/Beheco/Arr211 |
0.638 |
|
2011 |
Chappell MA, Savard JF, Siani J, Coleman SW, Keagy J, Borgia G. Aerobic capacity in wild satin bowerbirds: repeatability and effects of age, sex and condition. The Journal of Experimental Biology. 214: 3186-96. PMID 21900466 DOI: 10.1242/Jeb.055046 |
0.679 |
|
2011 |
Savard JF, Keagy J, Borgia G. Blue, not UV, plumage color is important in satin bowerbird Ptilonorhynchus violaceus display Journal of Avian Biology. 42: 80-84. DOI: 10.1111/J.1600-048X.2010.05128.X |
0.639 |
|
2011 |
Keagy J, Savard JF, Borgia G. Complex relationship between multiple measures of cognitive ability and male mating success in satin bowerbirds, Ptilonorhynchus violaceus Animal Behaviour. 81: 1063-1070. DOI: 10.1016/J.Anbehav.2011.02.018 |
0.611 |
|
2009 |
Keagy J, Savard JF, Borgia G. Male satin bowerbird problem-solving ability predicts mating success Animal Behaviour. 78: 809-817. DOI: 10.1016/J.Anbehav.2009.07.011 |
0.647 |
|
2008 |
Desrochers DW, Keagy JC, Cristol DA. Created versus natural wetlands: Avian communities in Virginia salt marshes Ecoscience. 15: 36-43. DOI: 10.2980/1195-6860(2008)15[36:Cvnwac]2.0.Co;2 |
0.579 |
|
2006 |
Borgia G, Keagy J. An inverse relationship between decoration and food colour preferences in satin bowerbirds does not support the sensory drive hypothesis Animal Behaviour. 72: 1125-1133. DOI: 10.1016/J.Anbehav.2006.03.015 |
0.606 |
|
2005 |
Keagy JC, Schreiber SJ, Cristol DA. Replacing sources with sinks: When do populations go down the drain? Restoration Ecology. 13: 529-535. DOI: 10.1111/J.1526-100X.2005.00066.X |
0.564 |
|
Show low-probability matches. |