cached image

35 high-probability publications. We are testing a new system for linking publications to authors. You can help! If you notice any inaccuracies, please sign in and mark papers as correct or incorrect matches. If you identify any major omissions or other inaccuracies in the publication list, please let us know.

Year Citation  Score
2010 Davis ET, Scott K, Hailston KW, Pair J, Hodges L. Ambient sounds can enhance visual perception and memory performance in virtual environments Journal of Vision. 6: 170-170. DOI: 10.1167/6.6.170  0.636
2006 Davis ET, Shikano T, Main K, Hailston K, Michel RK, Sathian K. Mirror-image symmetry and search asymmetry: a comparison of their effects on visual search and a possible unifying explanation. Vision Research. 46: 1263-81. PMID 16376402 DOI: 10.1016/J.Visres.2005.10.032  0.71
2006 Reed B, Rhodes P, Kraemer E, Hamilton-Taylor A, Davis ET, Hailston K. The effect of comparison cueing and exchange motion on comprehension of program visualizations Proceedings - Softvis 06: Acm Symposium On Software Visualization. 181-182. DOI: 10.1145/1148493.1148534  0.77
2006 Rhodes P, Kraemer E, Hamilton-Taylor A, Thomas S, Ross M, Davis E, Hailston K, Main K. VizEval: An experimental system for the study of program visualization quality Proceedings - Ieee Symposium On Visual Languages and Human-Centric Computing, Vl/Hcc 2006. 55-58. DOI: 10.1109/VLHCC.2006.57  0.761
2006 Davis ET, Hailston K, Kraemer E, Hamilton-Taylor A, Rhodes P, Papadimitriou C, Garcia BA. Perceptual characteristics of computerized program visualizations can differentially affect detection and localization performance Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. 2066-2070.  0.776
2006 Hailston K, Davis ET. Reducing uncertainty in visual search through the priming of visual-relatedness and the manipulation of observer expectancy Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. 1643-1646.  0.804
2005 Davis ET, Main K, Hailston K. Searching for search asymmetries with simple and complex stimuli Journal of Vision. 5: 949-949. DOI: 10.1167/5.8.949  0.756
2004 Davis ET, Palmer J. Visual search and attention: an overview. Spatial Vision. 17: 249-55. PMID 15559104 DOI: 10.1163/1568568041920168  0.491
2003 Davis ET, Shikano T, Peterson SA, Keyes Michel R. Divided attention and visual search for simple versus complex features. Vision Research. 43: 2213-32. PMID 12885376 DOI: 10.1016/S0042-6989(03)00339-0  0.654
2003 Davis ET, Shikano T, Peterson SA, Michel RK. Searching for the gap - Comparing young and older adults Journal of Vision. 3: 632a. DOI: 10.1167/3.9.632  0.722
2002 Davis ET, Fujawa G, Shikano T. Perceptual processing and search efficiency of young and older adults in a simple-feature search task: a staircase approach. The Journals of Gerontology. Series B, Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences. 57: P324-37. PMID 12084783 DOI: 10.1093/Geronb/57.4.P324  0.603
2002 Davis ET, Michel RK, Shikano T, Sathian K, Patel G. Perceptual versus attentional factors in visual search Journal of Vision. 2: 540a. DOI: 10.1167/2.7.540  0.783
2001 Davis ET, Shikano T, Peterson S, Keyes R, Shook CE. An SDT psychophysical approach to visual search and divided attention Journal of Vision. 1: 118a. DOI: 10.1167/1.3.118  0.67
1999 Davis ET, Scott K, Pair J, Hodges LF, Oliverio J. Can Audio Enhance Visual Perception and Performance in a Virtual Environment? Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting. 43: 1197-1201. DOI: 10.1177/154193129904302206  0.651
1999 Bowman DA, Davis ET, Hodges LF, Badre AN. Maintaining spatial orientation during travel in an immersive virtual environment Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments. 8: 618-631. DOI: 10.1162/105474699566521  0.582
1997 Surdick RT, Davis ET, King RA, Hodges LF. The perception of distance in simulated visual displays: A comparison of the effectiveness and accuracy of multiple depth cues across viewing distances Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments. 6: 513-531. DOI: 10.1162/Pres.1997.6.5.513  0.691
1996 Akers JW, Davis ET, King RA. Stereoscopic depth perception in simulated displays: what helps and what hurts? Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. 2: 1193-1196.  0.402
1996 Elliott KG, Davis ET, King RA, Fujawa GE. Single and combined visual distance cues Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. 2: 1184-1187.  0.568
1996 Akers JW, Davis ET, King RA. Is there a stereo aperture problem in human stereopsis? Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 37: S283.  0.327
1996 King RA, Elliott KG, Davis ET. A comparison of size constancy between matched scenes with many and few depth cues Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 37: S519.  0.449
1996 Elliott KG, King RA, Davis ET, Fujawa GE. Human distance and depth perception: An investigation of visual cues Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 37: S518.  0.565
1995 Davis ET, Bass SJ, Sherman J. Flash visual evoked potential (VEP) in amblyopia and optic nerve disease. Optometry and Vision Science : Official Publication of the American Academy of Optometry. 72: 612-8. PMID 8532302 DOI: 10.1097/00006324-199509000-00004  0.351
1995 Davis ET, Yager D, King RA, Kirkland BA. A labeled lines explanation of the perceived spatial frequency of moderate-, near-threshold- and zero-contrast spatial patterns. Vision Research. 35: 1025-40. PMID 7762159 DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(94)00198-U  0.765
1994 Troy Surdick R, Davis ET, King RA, Corso GM, Shapiro A, Hodges L, Elliot K. Relevant cues for the visual perception of depth: is where you see it where it is? Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. 2: 1305-1309.  0.73
1993 Hodges LF, Davis ET. Geometric Considerations for Stereoscopic Virtual Environments Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments. 2: 34-43. DOI: 10.1162/pres.1993.2.1.34  0.631
1993 Kirkland BA, Davis ET, Yager D, Surdick T, Hochstein A. Effects of contrast on perceived size of visual patterns: theory, data, and implications Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. 2: 1355-1359.  0.785
1992 Yuan R, Yager D, Davis ET. Reduction of foveal desensitization with blurred backgrounds. Vision Research. 32: 577-82. PMID 1604845 DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(92)90250-M  0.754
1990 Marran L, Davis ET. The effects of temporal modulation and spatial location on the perceived spatial frequency of visual patterns. Perception & Psychophysics. 47: 449-56. PMID 2349057 DOI: 10.3758/BF03208178  0.793
1988 Sherman J, Davis E, Schnider C, Bass S, Nath S, Cohen J. Presurgical prediction of postsurgical visual acuity in patients with media opacities Journal of the American Optometric Association. 59: 481-488. PMID 3403893  0.318
1987 Davis ET, Yager D, Jones BJ. Comparison of perceived spatial frequency between the fovea and the periphery. Journal of the Optical Society of America. a, Optics and Image Science. 4: 1606-11. PMID 3625343 DOI: 10.1364/Josaa.4.001606  0.686
1986 Davis ET, Kramer P, Yager D. Shifts in perceived spatial frequency of low-contrast stimuli: data and theory. Journal of the Optical Society of America. a, Optics and Image Science. 3: 1189-202. PMID 3746507 DOI: 10.1364/Josaa.3.001189  0.742
1983 Davis ET, Kramer P, Graham N. Uncertainty about spatial frequency, spatial position, or contrast of visual patterns. Perception & Psychophysics. 33: 20-8. PMID 6844089 DOI: 10.3758/BF03205862  0.76
1981 Davis ET, Graham N. Spatial frequency uncertainty effects in the detection of sinusoidal gratings. Vision Research. 21: 705-12. PMID 7293001 DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(81)90079-1  0.63
1981 Davis ET. Allocation of attention: uncertainty effects when monitoring one or two visual gratings of noncontiguous spatial frequencies. Perception & Psychophysics. 29: 618-22. PMID 7279593 DOI: 10.3758/BF03207381  0.394
1966 Davis ET. Heteromodal effects upon visual thresholds. Psychological Monographs. 80: 1-23. PMID 5971464  0.408
Show low-probability matches.