☰

Steve Penrod - Publications

Affiliations: 
Psychology City University of New York, New York, NY, United States 
Area:
Social Psychology
Tree Info Grants Similar researchers Related pubs Distance to... Nearest Nobel PubMed Report error

30 high-probability publications. We are testing a new system for linking publications to authors. You can help! If you notice any inaccuracies, please sign in and mark papers as correct or incorrect matches. If you identify any major omissions or other inaccuracies in the publication list, please let us know.

Year Citation  Score
2015 Tallon JA, Daftary-Kapur T, Penrod S. Defendant Remorse and Publicity in Capital Trials: Is Seeing Truly Believing? Criminal Justice and Behavior. 42: 1282-1302. DOI: 10.1177/0093854815602500  0.581
2015 Zimmerman D, Rodriguez D, Bergold A, Penrod S. The influence of pretrial exposure to community outrage and victim hardship on guilt judgments Psychology, Crime and Law. 1-20. DOI: 10.1080/1068316X.2015.1120870  0.347
2015 Jones AM, Jones S, Penrod S. Examining legal authoritarianism in the impact of punishment severity on juror decisions Psychology, Crime and Law. 21: 939-951. DOI: 10.1080/1068316X.2015.1077244  0.416
2014 Daftary-Kapur T, Penrod SD, O'Connor M, Wallace B. Examining pretrial publicity in a shadow jury paradigm: issues of slant, quantity, persistence and generalizability. Law and Human Behavior. 38: 462-77. PMID 24933173 DOI: 10.1037/Lhb0000081  0.599
2013 Patry MW, Penrod SD. Death Penalty Decisions: Instruction Comprehension, Attitudes, and Decision Mediators. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice. 13: 204-244. PMID 24072981 DOI: 10.1080/15228932.2013.795816  0.491
2010 Daftary-Kapur T, Dumas R, Penrod SD. Jury decision-making biases and methods to counter them Legal and Criminological Psychology. 15: 133-154. DOI: 10.1348/135532509X465624  0.591
2010 Kim MC, Penrod SD. Legal decision making among Korean and American legal professionals and lay people International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice. 38: 175-197. DOI: 10.1016/J.Ijlcj.2011.01.004  0.473
2009 Groscup J, Penrod S. Appellate Review and Eyewitness Experts Expert Testimony On the Psychology of Eyewitness Identification. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331974.003.005  0.373
2007 Heuer L, Penrod S, Kattan A. The role of societal benefits and fairness concerns among decision makers and decision recipients. Law and Human Behavior. 31: 573-610. PMID 17245632 DOI: 10.1007/S10979-006-9084-2  0.304
2006 Wells GL, Memon A, Penrod SD. Eyewitness Evidence: Improving Its Probative Value. Psychological Science in the Public Interest : a Journal of the American Psychological Society. 7: 45-75. PMID 26158855 DOI: 10.1111/J.1529-1006.2006.00027.X  0.326
2005 McAuliff BD, Nemeth RJ, Bornstein BH, Penrod SD. Juror Decision-Making in the Twenty-First Century: Confronting Science and Technology in Court Handbook of Psychology in Legal Contexts: Second Edition. 301-327. DOI: 10.1002/0470013397.ch13  0.344
2002 Stolle DP, Robbennolt JK, Patry M, Penrod SD. Equality in hiring permanent resident foreign nationals in the United States: When loyalty is the question, but not the issue Behavioral Sciences and the Law. 20: 141-160. PMID 11979496 DOI: 10.1002/bsl.481  0.324
2002 Studebaker CA, Robbennolt JK, Penrod SD, Pathak-Sharma MK, Groscup JL, Devenport JL. Studying pretrial publicity effects: new methods for improving ecological validity and testing external validity. Law and Human Behavior. 26: 19-41. PMID 11868618 DOI: 10.1023/A:1013877108082  0.43
2002 Groscup JL, Studebaker CA, Penrod SD, Huss MT, O'Neil KM. The effects of daubert on the admissibility of expert testimony in state and federal criminal cases Psychology, Public Policy, and Law. 8: 339-372. DOI: 10.1037/1076-8971.8.4.339  0.33
2000 Studebaker CA, Robbennolt JK, Pathak-Sharma MK, Penrod SD. Assessing pretrial publicity effects: integrating content analytic results. Law and Human Behavior. 24: 317-36. PMID 10846375 DOI: 10.1023/A:1005536204923  0.354
1997 Studebaker CA, Penrod SD. Pretrial Publicity: The Media, the Law, and Common Sense Psychology, Public Policy, and Law. 3: 428-460. DOI: 10.1037/1076-8971.3.2-3.428  0.475
1997 Devenport JL, Penrod SD, Cutler BL. Eyewitness Identification Evidence: Evaluating Commonsense Evaluations Psychology, Public Policy, and Law. 3: 338-361. DOI: 10.1037/1076-8971.3.2-3.338  0.338
1997 Penrod SD, Heuer L. Tweaking Commonsense: Assessing Aids to Jury Decision Making Psychology, Public Policy, and Law. 3: 259-284. DOI: 10.1037/1076-8971.3.2-3.259  0.369
1995 Penrod SD, Fulero SM, Cutler BL. Expert psychological testimony on eyewitness reliability before and after Daubert: the state of the law and the science. Behavioral Sciences & the Law. 13: 229-59. PMID 10150378 DOI: 10.1002/Bsl.2370130206  0.402
1994 Otto AL, Penrod SD, Dexter HR. The biasing impact of pretrial publicity on juror judgments Law and Human Behavior. 18: 453-469. DOI: 10.1007/Bf01499050  0.469
1994 Heuer L, Penrod S. Juror notetaking and question asking during trials - A national field experiment Law and Human Behavior. 18: 121-150. DOI: 10.1007/Bf01499012  0.406
1989 Cutler BL, Penrod SD, Dexter HR. The eyewitness, the expert psychologist, and the jury Law and Human Behavior. 13: 311-332. DOI: 10.1007/Bf01067032  0.372
1989 Heuer L, Penrod SD. Instructing jurors - A field experiment with written and preliminary instructions Law and Human Behavior. 13: 409-430. DOI: 10.1007/Bf01056412  0.398
1988 Cutler BL, Penrod SD, Stuve TE. Juror decision making in eyewitness identification cases Law and Human Behavior. 12: 41-55. DOI: 10.1007/Bf01064273  0.303
1988 Heuer L, Penrod S. Increasing jurors' participation in trials - A field experiment with jury notetaking and question asking Law and Human Behavior. 12: 231-261. DOI: 10.1007/Bf01044383  0.349
1986 Shapiro PN, Penrod S. Meta-Analysis of Facial Identification Studies Psychological Bulletin. 100: 139-156. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.100.2.139  0.335
1986 Linz D, Penrod S, McDonald E. Attorney communication and impression making in the courtroom - Views from Off the Bench Law and Human Behavior. 10: 281-302. DOI: 10.1007/Bf01047342  0.325
1985 Tanford S, Penrod S, Collins R. Decision making in joined criminal trials: The influence of charge similarity, evidence similarity, and limiting instructions Law and Human Behavior. 9: 319-337. DOI: 10.1007/Bf01044474  0.309
1980 Penrod S, Hastie R. A computer simulation of jury decision making Psychological Review. 87: 133-159. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.87.2.133  0.356
1979 Penrod S, Hastie R. Models of jury decision making: A critical review Psychological Bulletin. 86: 462-492. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.86.3.462  0.38
Show low-probability matches.