| Year |
Citation |
Score |
| 2015 |
Keselman HJ. Invited debate per family or familywise type I error control: "Eether, eyether, neether, nyther, let's call the whole thing off!" Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods. 14: 24-37. |
0.38 |
|
| 2015 |
Othman AR, Keselman HJ, Wilcox R. Assessing normality: Applications in multi-group designs Malaysian Journal of Mathematical Sciences. 9: 53-65. |
0.49 |
|
| 2013 |
Shaffer JP, Kowalchuk RK, Keselman HJ. Error, power, and cluster separation rates of pairwise multiple testing procedures. Psychological Methods. 18: 352-67. PMID 23646989 DOI: 10.1037/a0032478 |
0.418 |
|
| 2013 |
Keselman HJ, Othman AR, Wilcox RR. Preliminary testing for normality: Is this a good practice? Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods. 12: 1-19. |
0.358 |
|
| 2012 |
Wilcox RR, Keselman HJ. MODERN REGRESSION METHODS THAT CAN SUBSTANTIALLY INCREASE POWER AND PROVIDE A MORE ACCURATE UNDERSTANDING OF ASSOCIATIONS. European Journal of Personality. 26: 165-174. PMID 23626402 DOI: 10.1002/per.860 |
0.337 |
|
| 2012 |
Cribbie RA, Fiksenbaum L, Keselman HJ, Wilcox RR. Effect of non-normality on test statistics for one-way independent groups designs. The British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology. 65: 56-73. PMID 21426313 DOI: 10.1111/J.2044-8317.2011.02014.X |
0.709 |
|
| 2012 |
Keselman HJ, Miller CW, Holland B. "Many test of significance: New methods for controlling type I errors": Correction to Keselman et al. (2011). Psychological Methods. 17: 679-679. DOI: 10.1037/A0030995 |
0.31 |
|
| 2011 |
Keselman HJ, Miller CW, Holland B. Many tests of significance: new methods for controlling type I errors. Psychological Methods. 16: 420-31. PMID 22040371 DOI: 10.1037/A0025810 |
0.411 |
|
| 2010 |
Algina J, Keselman HJ, Penfield RD. Confidence intervals for squared semipartial correlation coefficients: The effect of nonnormality Educational and Psychological Measurement. 70: 926-940. DOI: 10.1177/0013164410379335 |
0.309 |
|
| 2008 |
Keselman HJ, Algina J, Lix LM, Wilcox RR, Deering KN. A generally robust approach for testing hypotheses and setting confidence intervals for effect sizes. Psychological Methods. 13: 110-29. PMID 18557681 DOI: 10.1037/1082-989X.13.2.110 |
0.528 |
|
| 2008 |
Keselman HJ, Wilcox RR, Algina J, Othman AR, Fradette K. A comparative study of robust tests for spread: asymmetric trimming strategies. The British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology. 61: 235-53. PMID 18433520 DOI: 10.1348/000711008X299742 |
0.386 |
|
| 2007 |
Keselman HJ, Wilcox RR, Lix LM, Algina J, Fradette K. Adaptive robust estimation and testing. The British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology. 60: 267-93. PMID 17971270 DOI: 10.1348/000711005X63755 |
0.457 |
|
| 2007 |
Cribbie RA, Bewell C, Wilcox RR, Keselman HJ. Tests for treatment group equality when data are nonnormal and heteroscedastic Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods. 6: 117-132. DOI: 10.22237/Jmasm/1177992660 |
0.707 |
|
| 2006 |
Algina J, Keselman HJ, Penfield RD. Confidence interval coverage for Cohen's effect size statistic Educational and Psychological Measurement. 66: 945-960. DOI: 10.1177/0013164406288161 |
0.316 |
|
| 2006 |
Wilcox RR, Keselman HJ. Detecting heteroscedasticity in a simple regression model via quantile regression slopes Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation. 76: 705-712. DOI: 10.1080/10629360500107923 |
0.331 |
|
| 2006 |
Algina J, Keselman HJ, Penfield RD. Confidence intervals for an effect size when variances are not equal Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods. 5: 2-13. |
0.354 |
|
| 2006 |
Kowalchuk RK, Keselman HJ, Algina J, Wilcox RR. Multiple comparison procedures, trimmed means and transformed statistics Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods. 5: 43-64. |
0.544 |
|
| 2005 |
Lix LM, Keselman HJ, Hinds AM. Robust tests for the multivariate Behrens-Fisher problem. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine. 77: 129-39. PMID 15652635 DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2004.09.002 |
0.44 |
|
| 2005 |
Algina J, Keselman HJ, Penfield RD. Effect sizes and their intervals: The two-level repeated measures case Educational and Psychological Measurement. 65: 241-258. DOI: 10.1177/0013164404268675 |
0.324 |
|
| 2005 |
Keselman HJ, Algina J, Fradette K. Robust confidence intervals for effect size in the two-group case Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods. 4: 353-371. |
0.326 |
|
| 2004 |
Othman AR, Keselman HJ, Padmanabhan AR, Wilcox RR, Fradette K. Comparing measures of the 'typical' score across treatment groups. The British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology. 57: 215-34. PMID 15511305 DOI: 10.1348/0007110042307159 |
0.48 |
|
| 2004 |
Keselman HJ, Cribbie RA, Holland B. Pairwise multiple comparison test procedures: an update for clinical child and adolescent psychologists. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology : the Official Journal For the Society of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, American Psychological Association, Division 53. 33: 623-45. PMID 15271619 DOI: 10.1207/S15374424Jccp3303_19 |
0.658 |
|
| 2004 |
Lix LM, Keselman HJ. Multivariate tests of means in independent groups designs. Effects of covariance heterogeneity and nonnormality. Evaluation & the Health Professions. 27: 45-69. PMID 14994559 DOI: 10.1177/0163278703261213 |
0.449 |
|
| 2004 |
Keselman HJ, Othman AR, Wilcox RR, Fradette K. The new and improved two-sample T test. Psychological Science. 15: 47-51. PMID 14717831 |
0.485 |
|
| 2004 |
Wilcox RR, Keselman HJ. Robust Regression Methods: Achieving Small Standard Errors When There Is Heteroscedasticity Understanding Statistics. 3: 349-364. DOI: 10.1207/s15328031us0304_8 |
0.31 |
|
| 2004 |
Algina J, Keselman HJ. Assessing treatment effects in randomized longitudinal two-group designs with missing observations Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods. 3: 271-287. |
0.347 |
|
| 2004 |
Algina J, Keselman HJ. A comparison of methods for longitudinal analysis with missing data Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods. 3: 13-26. |
0.417 |
|
| 2004 |
Kowalchuk RK, Keselman HJ, Algina J, Wolfinger RD. The analysis of repeated measurements with mixed-model adjusted F tests Educational and Psychological Measurement. 64: 224-242. |
0.492 |
|
| 2004 |
Keselman HJ, Wilcox RR, Algina J, Fradette K, Othman AR. A power comparison of robust test statistics based on adaptive estimators Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods. 3: 27-38. |
0.52 |
|
| 2003 |
Kowalchuk RK, Keselman HJ, Algina J. Repeated Measures Interaction Test with Aligned Ranks. Multivariate Behavioral Research. 38: 433-61. PMID 26777442 DOI: 10.1207/S15327906Mbr3804_2 |
0.463 |
|
| 2003 |
Lix LM, Algina J, Keselman HJ. Analyzing Multivariate Repeated Measures Designs: A Comparison of Two Approximate Degrees of Freedom Procedures. Multivariate Behavioral Research. 38: 403-31. PMID 26777441 DOI: 10.1207/S15327906Mbr3804_1 |
0.516 |
|
| 2003 |
Wilcox RR, Keselman HJ. Modern robust data analysis methods: measures of central tendency. Psychological Methods. 8: 254-74. PMID 14596490 DOI: 10.1037/1082-989X.8.3.254 |
0.353 |
|
| 2003 |
Keselman HJ, Wilcox RR, Lix LM. A generally robust approach to hypothesis testing in independent and correlated groups designs. Psychophysiology. 40: 586-96. PMID 14570166 DOI: 10.1111/1469-8986.00060 |
0.504 |
|
| 2003 |
Cribbie RA, Keselman HJ. Pairwise multiple comparisons: a model comparison approach versus stepwise procedures. The British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology. 56: 167-82. PMID 12803829 DOI: 10.1348/000711003321645412 |
0.637 |
|
| 2003 |
Wilcox RR, Keselman HJ. Repeated measures one-way ANOVA based on a modified one-step M-estimator. The British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology. 56: 15-25. PMID 12803819 DOI: 10.1348/000711003321645313 |
0.403 |
|
| 2003 |
Cribbie RA, Keselman HJ. The effects of nonnormality on parametric, nonparametric, and model comparison approaches to pairwise comparisons Educational and Psychological Measurement. 63: 615-635. DOI: 10.1177/0013164403251283 |
0.724 |
|
| 2003 |
Algina J, Keselman HJ, Othman AR. Analyzing group by time effects in longitudinal two-group randomized trial designs with missing data Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods. 2: 50-72. |
0.416 |
|
| 2003 |
Fradette K, Keselman HJ, Algina J, Lix L, Wilcox RR. Conventional and robust paired and independent-samples t tests: Type I error and power rates Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods. 2: 481-496. |
0.494 |
|
| 2002 |
Keselman HJ, Algina J, Kowalchuk RK. A Comparison of Data Analysis Strategies for Testing Omnibus Effects in Higher-Order Repeated Measures Designs. Multivariate Behavioral Research. 37: 331-57. PMID 26751292 DOI: 10.1207/S15327906Mbr3703_2 |
0.464 |
|
| 2002 |
Keselman HJ, Cribbie R, Holland B. Controlling the rate of Type I error over a large set of statistical tests. The British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology. 55: 27-39. PMID 12034010 DOI: 10.1348/000711002159680 |
0.685 |
|
| 2002 |
Keselman HJ, Cribbie RA, Wilcox RR. Pairwise multiple comparison tests when data are nonnormal Educational and Psychological Measurement. 62: 420-434. DOI: 10.1177/00164402062003002 |
0.723 |
|
| 2002 |
Keselman HJ, Wilcox RR, Kowalchuk RK, Olejnik S. Comparing trimmed or least squares means of two independent skewed populations Biometrical Journal. 44: 478-489. DOI: 10.1002/1521-4036(200206)44:4<478::Aid-Bimj478>3.0.Co;2-5 |
0.493 |
|
| 2002 |
Wilcox RR, Keselman HJ. Power analyses when comparing trimmed means Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods. 1: 24-31. |
0.343 |
|
| 2002 |
Wilcox RR, Keselman HJ. Within groups multiple comparisons based on robust measures of location Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods. 1: 281-287. |
0.429 |
|
| 2002 |
Keselman HJ, Wilcox RR, Othman AR, Fradette K. Trimming, transforming statistics, and bootstrapping: Circumventing the biasing effects of heterescedasticity and nonnormality Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods. 1: 288-309. |
0.47 |
|
| 2002 |
Othman AR, Keselman HJ, Wilcox RR, Fradette K, Padmanabhan AR. A test of symmetry Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods. 1: 310-315. |
0.499 |
|
| 2001 |
Wilcox RR, Keselman HJ. Using Trimmed Means to Compare K Measures Corresponding to Two Independent Groups. Multivariate Behavioral Research. 36: 421-44. PMID 26751183 DOI: 10.1207/S15327906421-444 |
0.328 |
|
| 2001 |
Kowalchuk RK, Keselman HJ. Mixed-model pairwise multiple comparisons of repeated measures means. Psychological Methods. 6: 282-96. PMID 11570233 |
0.502 |
|
| 2001 |
Keselman HJ, Algina J, Kowalchuk RK. The analysis of repeated measures designs: a review. The British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology. 54: 1-20. PMID 11393894 DOI: 10.1348/000711001159357 |
0.41 |
|
| 2000 |
Keselman HJ, Kowalchuk RK, Algina J, Lix LM, Wilcox RR. Testing treatment effects in repeated measures designs: trimmed means and bootstrapping. The British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology. 53: 175-91. PMID 11109703 DOI: 10.1348/000711000159286 |
0.498 |
|
| 2000 |
Wilcox RR, Keselman HJ, Muska J, Cribbie R. Repeated measures ANOVA: some new results on comparing trimmed means and means. The British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology. 53: 69-82. PMID 10895523 DOI: 10.1348/000711000159187 |
0.664 |
|
| 2000 |
Keselman HJ, Kowalchuk RK, Boik RJ. An examination of the robustness of the empirical Bayes and other approaches for testing main and interaction effects in repeated measures designs. The British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology. 53: 51-67. PMID 10895522 DOI: 10.1348/000711000159178 |
0.489 |
|
| 2000 |
Keselman HJ, Wilcox RR, Taylor J, Kowalchuk RK. Tests for mean equality that do not require homogeneity of variances: Do they really work? Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods. 29: 875-895. DOI: 10.1080/03610910008813644 |
0.483 |
|
| 2000 |
Olejnik S, Mills J, Keselman H. Using Wherry's AdjustedR2and Mallow'sCpfor Model Selection From All Possible Regressions The Journal of Experimental Education. 68: 365-380. DOI: 10.1080/00220970009600643 |
0.371 |
|
| 2000 |
Keselman HJ, Algina J, Wilcox RR, Kowalchuk RK. Testing repeated measures hypotheses when covariance matrices are heterogeneous: Revisiting the robustness of the Welch-James test again Educational and Psychological Measurement. 60: 925-938. |
0.491 |
|
| 1999 |
Algina J, Keselman HJ. Comparing squared multiple correlation coefficients: Examination of a confidence interval and a test of significance Psychological Methods. 4: 76-83. DOI: 10.1037/1082-989X.4.1.76 |
0.301 |
|
| 1999 |
Keselman HJ, Cribbie R, Holland B. The pairwise multiple comparison multiplicity problem: An alternative approach to familywise and comparisonwise type I error control Psychological Methods. 4: 58-69. DOI: 10.1037/1082-989X.4.1.58 |
0.686 |
|
| 1999 |
Keselman HJ, Wilcox RR. The 'improved' Brown and Forsythe test for mean equality: Some things can't be fixed Communications in Statistics Part B: Simulation and Computation. 28: 687-698. |
0.489 |
|
| 1999 |
Keselman HJ, Algina J, Kowalchuk RK, Wolfinger RD. A comparison of recent approaches to the analysis of repeated measurements British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology. 52: 63-78. |
0.455 |
|
| 1999 |
Keselman HJ, Kowalchuk RK, Algina J, Wolfinger RD. The analysis of repeated measurements: A comparison of mixed-model Satterthwaite F tests and a nonpooled adjusted degrees of freedom multivariate test Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods. 28: 2967-2999. |
0.456 |
|
| 1998 |
Keselman HJ. Testing treatment effects in repeated measures designs: an update for psychophysiological researchers. Psychophysiology. 35: 470-8. PMID 9643062 DOI: 10.1017/S0048577298000237 |
0.35 |
|
| 1998 |
Keselman HJ, Huberty CJ, Cribbie RA, Lowman LL, Lix LM, Donahue B, Petoskey MD, Olejnik S, Kowalchuk RK, Keselman JC, Levin JR. Statistical practices of educational researchers: An analysis of their ANOVA, MANOVA, and ANCOVA analyses Review of Educational Research. 68: 350-386. DOI: 10.3102/00346543068003350 |
0.609 |
|
| 1998 |
Lix LM, Keselman HJ. To trim or not to trim: Tests of location equality under heteroscedasticity and nonnormality Educational and Psychological Measurement. 58: 409-429. |
0.502 |
|
| 1998 |
Algina J, Keselman HJ. A Power Comparison of the Welch-James and Improved General Approximation Tests in the Split-Plot Design Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics. 23: 152-169. |
0.398 |
|
| 1998 |
Keselman HJ, Kowalchuk RK, Algina J, Wolfinger RD. A comparison of two approaches for selecting covariance structures in the analysis of repeated measurements Communications in Statistics Part B: Simulation and Computation. 27: 591-604. |
0.344 |
|
| 1998 |
Keselman HJ, Kowalchuk RK, Lix LM. Robust nonorthogonal analyses revisited: An update based on trimmed means Psychometrika. 63: 145-163. |
0.472 |
|
| 1998 |
Keselman HJ, Lix LM, Kowalchuk RK. Multiple Comparison Procedures for Trimmed Means Psychological Methods. 3: 123-141. |
0.425 |
|
| 1998 |
Wilcox RR, Keselman HJ, Kowalchuk RK. Can tests for treatment group equality be improved?: The bootstrap and trimmed means conjecture British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology. 51: 123-134. |
0.508 |
|
| 1997 |
Algina J, Keselman HJ. Testing Repeated Measures Hypotheses when Covariance Matrices are Heterogeneous: Revisiting the Robustness of the Welch-James Test. Multivariate Behavioral Research. 32: 255-74. PMID 26761611 DOI: 10.1207/S15327906Mbr3203_2 |
0.427 |
|
| 1997 |
Keselman HJ, Cribbie R, Zumbo BD. Specialized tests for detecting treatment effects in the two-sample problem Journal of Experimental Education. 65: 355-366. DOI: 10.1080/00220973.1997.10806610 |
0.672 |
|
| 1997 |
Keselman HJ, Lix LM. Analysing multivariate repeated measures designs when covariance matrices are heterogeneous British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology. 50: 319-338. |
0.455 |
|
| 1997 |
Algina J, Keselman HJ. Detecting Repeated Measures Effects with Univariate and Multivariate Statistics Psychological Methods. 2: 208-218. |
0.391 |
|
| 1996 |
Lix LM, Keselman HJ. Interaction contrasts in repeated measures designs British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology. 49: 147-162. |
0.467 |
|
| 1996 |
Keselman JC, Lix LM, Keselman HJ. The analysis of repeated measurements: A quantitative research synthesis British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology. 49: 275-298. |
0.523 |
|
| 1996 |
Lix LM, Keselman JC, Keselman HJ. Consequences of assumption violations revisited: A quantitative review of alternatives to the one-way analysis of variance F test Review of Educational Research. 66: 579-619. |
0.5 |
|
| 1995 |
Keselman HJ, Keselman JC, Lix LM. The analysis of repeated measurements: Univariate tests, multivariate tests, or both? British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology. 48: 319-338. DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8317.1995.tb01066.x |
0.361 |
|
| 1995 |
Keselman HJ, Carriere KC, Lix LM. Robust and powerful nonorthogonal analyses Psychometrika. 60: 395-418. DOI: 10.1007/Bf02296967 |
0.433 |
|
| 1995 |
Lix LM, Keselman HJ. Approximate Degrees of Freedom Tests: A Unified Perspective on Testing for Mean Equality Psychological Bulletin. 117: 547-560. |
0.442 |
|
| 1993 |
Keselman HJ, Carriere KC, Lix LM. Testing Repeated Measures Hypotheses When Covariance Matrices are Heterogeneous Journal of Educational Statistics. 18: 305-319. DOI: 10.3102/10769986018004305 |
0.505 |
|
| 1991 |
Keselman HJ, Keselman JC, Games PA. Maximum familywise type I error rate: The least significant difference, newman-keuls, and other multiple comparison procedures Psychological Bulletin. 110: 155-161. |
0.457 |
|
| 1987 |
Keselman HJ, Keselman JC. Type I error control and the power to detect factorial effects British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology. 40: 196-208. DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8317.1987.tb00881.x |
0.326 |
|
| 1984 |
Keselman HJ, Keselman JC. The analysis of repeated measures designs in medical research. Statistics in Medicine. 3: 185-95. PMID 6463455 |
0.473 |
|
| 1982 |
Keselman HJ. Multiple comparisons for repeated measures means Multivariate Behavioral Research. 17: 87-92. DOI: 10.1207/s15327906mbr1701_5 |
0.395 |
|
| 1980 |
Keselman HJ, Games PA, Rogan JC. Type I and Type II errors in simultaneous and two-stage multiple comparison procedures Psychological Bulletin. 88: 356-358. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.88.2.356 |
0.369 |
|
| 1980 |
Keselman HJ, Rogan JC, Mendoza JL, Breen LJ. Testing the validity conditions of repeated measures F tests Psychological Bulletin. 87: 479-481. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.87.3.479 |
0.325 |
|
| 1979 |
Rogan JC, Keselman HJ, Mendoza JL. Analysis of repeated measurements British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology. 32: 269-286. DOI: 10.1111/J.2044-8317.1979.Tb00598.X |
0.435 |
|
| 1979 |
Keselman HJ, Games PA, Clinch JJ. Tests for homogeneity of variance Communications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation. 8: 91-111. DOI: 10.1080/03610917908812107 |
0.423 |
|
| 1979 |
Keselman HJ, Games PA, Rogan JC. An addendum to “a comparison of the modified-tukey and Scheffé methods of multiple comparisons for pairwise contrasts” Journal of the American Statistical Association. 74: 626-627. DOI: 10.1080/01621459.1979.10481659 |
0.431 |
|
| 1979 |
Games PA, Keselman HJ, Clinch JJ. Tests for homogeneity of variance in factorial designs Psychological Bulletin. 86: 978-984. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.86.5.978 |
0.445 |
|
| 1979 |
Keselman HJ, Games PA, Rogan JC. Protecting the overall rate of Type I errors for pairwise comparisons with an omnibus test statistic Psychological Bulletin. 86: 884-888. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.86.4.884 |
0.46 |
|
| 1978 |
Keselman HJ, Rogan JC. A comparison of the Modified-Tukey and scheffé methods of multiple comparisons for pairwise contrasts Journal of the American Statistical Association. 73: 47-52. DOI: 10.1080/01621459.1978.10479996 |
0.471 |
|
| 1977 |
Keselman HJ, Rogan JC. An evaluation of some non-parametric and parametric tests for multiple comparisons British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology. 30: 125-133. DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8317.1977.tb00731.x |
0.315 |
|
| 1977 |
Rogan JC, Keselman HJ, Breen LJ. Assumption violations and rates of type i error for the tukey multiple comparison test: A review and empirical investigation via a coefficient of variance variation Journal of Experimental Education. 46: 20-25. DOI: 10.1080/00220973.1977.11011605 |
0.479 |
|
| 1977 |
Keselman HJ, Rogan JC. The Tukey multiple comparison test: 1953-1976 Psychological Bulletin. 84: 1050-1056. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.84.5.1050 |
0.457 |
|
| 1977 |
Keselman HJ, Rogan JC, Feir-Walsh BJ. An evaluation of some non-parametric and parametric tests for location equality British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology. 30: 213-221. |
0.48 |
|
| 1976 |
Keselman H, Murray R, Rogan J. Effect of Very Unequal Group Sizes On Tukey's Multiple Comparison Test Educational and Psychological Measurement. 36: 263-270. DOI: 10.1177/001316447603600203 |
0.312 |
|
| 1976 |
Keselman HJ. A power investigation of the tukey multiple comparison statistic Educational and Psychological Measurement. 36: 97-104. DOI: 10.1177/001316447603600108 |
0.402 |
|
| 1974 |
Keselman HJ, Toothaker LE. Comparison of Tukey's T-Method and Scheffé's S-Method for various numbers of all possible differences of averages contrasts under violation of assumptions Educational and Psychological Measurement. 34: 511-519. DOI: 10.1177/001316447403400304 |
0.371 |
|
| 1974 |
Keselman HJ. Multiple testing and Type I errors: A reply in defense of multifactor designs. American Psychologist. 29: 778-779. DOI: 10.1037/h0038177 |
0.393 |
|
| 1974 |
Keselman HJ. The statistic with the smaller critical value Psychological Bulletin. 81: 130-131. DOI: 10.1037/h0037614 |
0.372 |
|
| 1974 |
Keselman HJ, Murray R. Tukey tests for pair-wise contrasts following the analysis of variance: Is there a type IV error? Psychological Bulletin. 81: 608-609. DOI: 10.1037/h0036938 |
0.42 |
|
| 1973 |
Keselman HJ, Toothaker LE. Error rates for multiple comparison methods: Some evidence concerning the misleading conclusions of Petrinovich and Hardyck Psychological Bulletin. 80: 31-32. DOI: 10.1037/h0034628 |
0.341 |
|
| Show low-probability matches. |