Thomas M. Keck - Publications
Affiliations: | Political Science | Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY, United States |
Area:
General, Legal Studies, LawYear | Citation | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2018 | Keck TM. Assessing Judicial Empowerment Laws. 7: 14. DOI: 10.3390/Laws7020014 | 0.501 | |||
2016 | Keck TM, Metroka BT, Price RS. The Judicial Protection of Anti-Judicial Speech American University of International Law Review. 33: 693. DOI: 10.2139/Ssrn.2783491 | 0.524 | |||
2016 | Keck TM, McMahon KJ. Why roe still stands: Abortion law, the supreme court, and the republican regime Studies in Law Politics and Society. 70: 33-83. DOI: 10.1108/S1059-433720160000070009 | 0.508 | |||
2015 | Price RS, Keck TM. Movement Litigation and Unilateral Disarmament: Abortion and the Right to Die Law and Social Inquiry. DOI: 10.1111/Lsi.12106 | 0.562 | |||
2009 | Keck TM. Beyond backlash: Assessing the impact of judicial decisions on LGBT rights Law and Society Review. 43: 151-186. DOI: 10.1111/J.1540-5893.2009.00370.X | 0.508 | |||
2007 | Keck TM. Party Politics or Judicial Independence? The Regime Politics Literature Hits the Law Schools Law and Social Inquiry-Journal of the American Bar Foundation. 32: 511-544. DOI: 10.1111/J.1747-4469.2007.00067.X | 0.539 | |||
2007 | Keck TM. Party, policy, or duty: Why does the supreme court invalidate federal statutes? American Political Science Review. 101: 321-337. DOI: 10.1017/S0003055407070190 | 0.455 | |||
2007 | Keck TM. The neoconservative assault on the courts: How worried should we be? Confronting the New Conservatism: the Rise of the Right in America. 164-193. | 0.364 | |||
2006 | Keck TM. Queering the Rehnquist Court Political Research Quarterly. 59: 417-418. DOI: 10.1177/106591290605900309 | 0.486 | |||
2004 | Keck TM. Does the Court Follow the Election Returns Reviews in American History. 32: 602-609. DOI: 10.1353/Rah.2004.0068 | 0.415 | |||
2002 | Keck TM. Activism and restraint on the Rehnquist court: Timing, sequence, and conjuncture in constitutional development Polity. 35: 121-152. DOI: 10.1086/Polv35N1Ms3235473 | 0.479 | |||
Show low-probability matches. |