Lee H. de-Wit, Ph.D. - Publications

Psychology Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Vlaanderen, Belgium 
Vision, attention, action

35 high-probability publications. We are testing a new system for linking publications to authors. You can help! If you notice any inaccuracies, please sign in and mark papers as correct or incorrect matches. If you identify any major omissions or other inaccuracies in the publication list, please let us know.

Year Citation  Score
2019 de-Wit L, Ekroll V, Schwarzkopf DS, Wagemans J. Is information theory, or the assumptions that surround it, holding back neuroscience? The Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 42: e223. PMID 31775924 DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X19001250  0.707
2018 Huygelier H, Van der Hallen R, Wagemans J, de-Wit L, Chamberlain R. The Leuven Embedded Figures Test (L-EFT): measuring perception, intelligence or executive function? Peerj. 6: e4524. PMID 29607257 DOI: 10.7717/peerj.4524  0.561
2018 Van der Hallen R, Reusens J, Evers K, de-Wit L, Wagemans J. Connection-based and object-based grouping in multiple-object tracking: A developmental study. The British Journal of Developmental Psychology. PMID 29600820 DOI: 10.1111/bjdp.12245  0.585
2018 Van der Hallen R, Chamberlain R, de-Wit L, Wagemans J. Superior Disembedding in Children with ASD: New Tests Using Abstract, Meaningful, and 3D Contexts. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders. PMID 29468574 DOI: 10.1007/s10803-018-3508-y  0.541
2017 Moors P, Wagemans J, de-Wit L. Causal events enter awareness faster than non-causal events. Peerj. 5: e2932. PMID 28149698 DOI: 10.7717/Peerj.2932  0.637
2017 de-Wit L, Huygelier H, Van der Hallen R, Chamberlain R, Wagemans J. Developing the Leuven Embedded Figures Test (L-EFT): testing the stimulus features that influence embedding. Peerj. 5: e2862. PMID 28149677 DOI: 10.7717/Peerj.2862  0.627
2016 Talpos JC, de-Wit L, Olley J, Riordan J, Steckler T. Do wholes become more than the sum of their parts in the rodent (Rattus Norvegicus) visual system? A test case with the Configural Superiority Effect. The European Journal of Neuroscience. PMID 27471169 DOI: 10.1111/Ejn.13350  0.417
2016 Moors P, Wagemans J, de-Wit L. Faces in commonly experienced configurations enter awareness faster due to their curvature relative to fixation. Peerj. 4: e1565. PMID 26839746 DOI: 10.7717/Peerj.1565  0.616
2016 de-Wit L, Alexander D, Ekroll V, Wagemans J. Is neuroimaging measuring information in the brain? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. PMID 26833316 DOI: 10.3758/S13423-016-1002-0  0.716
2015 Moors P, Wagemans J, van Ee R, de-Wit L. No evidence for surface organization in Kanizsa configurations during continuous flash suppression. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics. PMID 26704563 DOI: 10.3758/S13414-015-1043-X  0.64
2015 Costa T, Zaninotto A, Benute G, Lúcia M, Paiva W, Wagemans J, de-Wit L, Boggio P. Non-specific Perceptual Organization Deficits After Traumatic Brain Injury. Journal of Vision. 15: 845. PMID 26326533 DOI: 10.1167/15.12.845  0.633
2015 Kubilius J, de-Wit L, Op de Beeck H, Wagemans J, Mullin C. Does segmentation influence rapid scene categorization? Journal of Vision. 15: 350. PMID 26326038 DOI: 10.7490/F1000Research.1098012.1  0.746
2015 Van der Hallen R, Chamberlain R, de-Wit L, Wagemans J. The Leuven Embedded Figures Test (L-EFT): Re-embedding the EFT into vision sciences. Journal of Vision. 15: 336. PMID 26326024 DOI: 10.1167/15.12.336  0.639
2015 Moors P, Huygelier H, Wagemans J, de-Wit L, van Ee R. Suppressed visual looming stimuli are not integrated with auditory looming signals: Evidence from continuous flash suppression. I-Perception. 6: 48-62. PMID 26034573 DOI: 10.1068/I0678  0.658
2015 Van der Hallen R, Evers K, de-Wit L, Steyaert J, Noens I, Wagemans J. Multiple Object Tracking Reveals Object-Based Grouping Interference in Children with ASD. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders. PMID 25982309 DOI: 10.1007/S10803-015-2463-0  0.606
2015 Mullin C, de-Wit L, Beeck HOd, Wagemans J, Kubilius J. The influence of segmentation on rapid scene categorization F1000research. 4. DOI: 10.7490/F1000Research.1110410.1  0.741
2014 Van de Cruys S, Evers K, Van der Hallen R, Van Eylen L, Boets B, de-Wit L, Wagemans J. Precise minds in uncertain worlds: predictive coding in autism. Psychological Review. 121: 649-75. PMID 25347312 DOI: 10.1037/A0037665  0.58
2014 de-Wit L, Schwarzkopf DS. Do we need another neural correlate of contour integration? I-Perception. 5: 50-2. PMID 25165516 DOI: 10.1068/I0629Jc  0.364
2014 Vancleef K, Acke E, Torfs K, Demeyere N, Lafosse C, Humphreys G, Wagemans J, de-Wit L. Reliability and validity of the Leuven Perceptual Organization Screening Test (L-POST). Journal of Neuropsychology. PMID 25042381 DOI: 10.1111/Jnp.12050  0.767
2014 Moors P, Wagemans J, de-Wit L. Moving stimuli are less effectively masked using traditional continuous flash suppression (CFS) compared to a moving Mondrian mask (MMM): a test case for feature-selective suppression and retinotopic adaptation. Plos One. 9: e98298. PMID 24879378 DOI: 10.1371/Journal.Pone.0098298  0.633
2014 Evers K, de-Wit L, Van der Hallen R, Haesen B, Steyaert J, Noens I, Wagemans J. Brief report: Reduced grouping interference in children with ASD: evidence from a Multiple Object Tracking Task. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders. 44: 1779-87. PMID 24398878 DOI: 10.1007/S10803-013-2031-4  0.621
2014 Torfs K, Vancleef K, Lafosse C, Wagemans J, de-Wit L. The Leuven Perceptual Organization Screening Test (L-POST), an online test to assess mid-level visual perception. Behavior Research Methods. 46: 472-87. PMID 24190065 DOI: 10.3758/S13428-013-0382-6  0.78
2014 Moors P, Wagemans J, de-Wit L. Mean normalized thresholds in function of target speed and mask speed. Plos One. DOI: 10.1371/Journal.Pone.0098298.G003  0.551
2014 Moutsiana C, Soliman R, de-Wit L, Sereno MI, Plant G, Schwarzkopf DS. Case study of unexplained visual field loss and perceptual deficits in the presence of normal early visual function Journal of Vision. 14: 48-48. DOI: 10.1167/14.10.48  0.397
2013 de-Wit LH, Kubilius J, Op de Beeck HP, Wagemans J. Configural Gestalts remain nothing more than the sum of their parts in visual agnosia. I-Perception. 4: 493-7. PMID 25165506 DOI: 10.1068/I0613Rep  0.756
2013 Van de Cruys S, de-Wit L, Evers K, Boets B, Wagemans J. Weak priors versus overfitting of predictions in autism: Reply to Pellicano and Burr (TICS, 2012). I-Perception. 4: 95-7. PMID 23755353 DOI: 10.1068/I0580Ic  0.573
2012 de-Wit L, Milner D, Kentridge R. Shadows remain segmented as selectable regions in object-based attention paradigms. I-Perception. 3: 150-8. PMID 23145275 DOI: 10.1068/I7164  0.69
2012 de-Wit LH, Kubilius J, Wagemans J, Op de Beeck HP. Bistable Gestalts reduce activity in the whole of V1, not just the retinotopically predicted parts. Journal of Vision. 12. PMID 23090610 DOI: 10.1167/12.11.12  0.749
2012 Poljac E, de-Wit L, Wagemans J. Perceptual wholes can reduce the conscious accessibility of their parts. Cognition. 123: 308-12. PMID 22306190 DOI: 10.1016/J.Cognition.2012.01.001  0.623
2011 de-Wit LH, Cole GG, Kentridge RW, Milner AD. The parallel representation of the objects selected by attention. Journal of Vision. 11. PMID 21508268 DOI: 10.1167/11.4.13  0.702
2011 de-Wit LH, Lefevre CE, Kentridge RW, Rees G, Saygin AP. Investigating the status of biological stimuli as objects of attention in multiple object tracking. Plos One. 6: e16232. PMID 21483844 DOI: 10.1371/Journal.Pone.0016232  0.617
2011 Marrett NE, de-Wit LH, Roser ME, Kentridge RW, Milner AD, Lambert AJ. Testing the dorsal stream attention hypothesis: Electrophysiological correlates and the effects of ventral stream damage Visual Cognition. 19: 1089-1121. DOI: 10.1080/13506285.2011.622729  0.706
2009 de-Wit LH, Kentridge RW, Milner AD. Shape processing area LO and illusory contours. Perception. 38: 1260-3. PMID 19817157 DOI: 10.1068/P6388  0.72
2009 de-Wit LH, Kentridge RW, Milner AD. Object-based attention and visual area LO. Neuropsychologia. 47: 1483-90. PMID 19038274 DOI: 10.1016/J.Neuropsychologia.2008.11.002  0.709
2008 Kentridge RW, De-Wit LH, Heywood CA. What is attended in spatial attention? Journal of Consciousness Studies. 15: 105-111.  0.568
Show low-probability matches.