Steven L. Blader, Ph.D. - Publications

Affiliations: 
2002 New York University, New York, NY, United States 
Area:
Social Psychology

26 high-probability publications. We are testing a new system for linking publications to authors. You can help! If you notice any inaccuracies, please sign in and mark papers as correct or incorrect matches. If you identify any major omissions or other inaccuracies in the publication list, please let us know.

Year Citation  Score
2016 Hays NA, Blader SL. To Give or Not to Give? Interactive Effects of Status and Legitimacy on Generosity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. PMID 27428046 DOI: 10.1037/pspi0000067  0.88
2016 Blader SL, Shirako A, Chen Y. Looking Out From the Top: Differential Effects of Status and Power on Perspective Taking. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin. PMID 27036500 DOI: 10.1177/0146167216636628  0.88
2015 Blader S, Gartenberg C, Henderson R, Prat A. The real effects of relational contracts American Economic Review. 105: 452-456. DOI: 10.1257/aer.p20151002  0.88
2014 Pan C, Pettit NC, Sivanathan N, Blader SL. Low-status aversion: The effect of self-threat on willingness to buy and sell Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 44: 708-716. DOI: 10.1111/jasp.12261  0.88
2014 Blader SL, Rothman NB. Paving the road to preferential treatment with good intentions: Empathy, accountability and fairness Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 50: 65-81. DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2013.09.001  0.88
2014 Hildreth JAD, Moore DA, Blader SL. Revisiting the Instrumentality of Voice: Having Voice in the Process Makes People Think They Will Get What They Want Social Justice Research. 27: 209-230. DOI: 10.1007/s11211-014-0211-9  0.88
2014 Blader SL, Chen YR. What's in a name? Status, power, and other forms of social hierarchy The Psychology of Social Status. 71-95. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4939-0867-7_4  0.88
2013 Blader SL, Wiesenfeld BM, Fortin M, Wheeler-Smith SL. Fairness lies in the heart of the beholder: How the social emotions of third parties influence reactions to injustice Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 121: 62-80. DOI: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2012.12.004  0.88
2012 Blader SL, Chen YR. Differentiating the effects of status and power: a justice perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 102: 994-1014. PMID 22229456 DOI: 10.1037/a0026651  0.88
2012 Uleman JS, Blader SL, Todorov A. Implicit Impressions The New Unconscious. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195307696.003.0015  0.88
2011 Blader SL, Chen YR. What influences how higher-status people respond to lower-status others? Effects of procedural fairness, outcome favorability, and concerns about status Organization Science. 22: 1040-1060. DOI: 10.1287/orsc.1100.0558  0.88
2010 Blader SL, Wiesenfeld BM, Rothman NB, Sara LWS. Chapter 2: Social emotions and justice: How the emotional fabric of groups determines justice enactment and reactions Research On Managing Groups and Teams. 13: 29-62. DOI: 10.1108/S1534-0856(2010)0000013005  0.88
2009 Blader SL, Tyler TR. Testing and extending the group engagement model: linkages between social identity, procedural justice, economic outcomes, and extrarole behavior. The Journal of Applied Psychology. 94: 445-64. PMID 19271800 DOI: 10.1037/a0013935  0.88
2009 Adams SM, Agarwala T, Akbar H, Andrews M, Ang S, Arnold S, Ascigil S, Bachrach D, Bacon N, Balkin D, Bartol K, Bauer T, Beauregard A, Bell BS, Berrin E, ... ... Blader SL, et al. Thank you reviewers! Group and Organization Management. 34: 140-145. DOI: 10.1177/1059601108329743  0.88
2009 Tost LP, Blader SL, Wade-Benzoni KA. A tale of two theories: Integrating the uncertainty management and group value models of justice Academy of Management 2009 Annual Meeting: Green Management Matters, Aom 2009 0.88
2007 Blader SL. What leads organizational members to collectivize? Injustice and identification as precursors of union certification Organization Science. 18: 108-126. DOI: 10.1287/orsc.1060.0217  0.88
2007 Blader SL. What determines people's fairness judgments? Identification and outcomes influence procedural justice evaluations under uncertainty Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 43: 986-994. DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2006.10.022  0.88
2006 De Cremer D, Blader SL. Why do people care about procedural fairness? the importance of belongingness in responding and attending to procedures European Journal of Social Psychology. 36: 211-228. DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.290  0.88
2005 Tyler TR, Blader SL. Can businesses effectively regulate employee conduct? The antecedents of rule following in work settings Academy of Management Journal. 48: 1143-1158.  0.88
2003 Blader SL, Tyler TR. A four-component model of procedural justice: defining the meaning of a "fair" process. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin. 29: 747-58. PMID 15189630 DOI: 10.1177/0146167203029006007  0.88
2003 Tyler TR, Blader SL. The group engagement model: procedural justice, social identity, and cooperative behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review : An Official Journal of the Society For Personality and Social Psychology, Inc. 7: 349-61. PMID 14633471  0.88
2003 Blader SL, Tyler TR. What constitutes fairness in work settings? A four-component model of procedural justice Human Resource Management Review. 13: 107-126. DOI: 10.1016/S1053-4822(02)00101-8  0.88
2002 Tyler TR, Blader SL. Autonomous vs. comparative status: Must we be better than others to feel good about ourselves? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 89: 813-838. DOI: 10.1016/S0749-5978(02)00031-6  0.88
2002 Tyler TR, Blader SL. Terms of engagement: Why do people invest themselves in work? Research On Managing Groups and Teams. 4: 115-140.  0.88
2001 Heilman ME, Blader SL. Assuming preferential selection when the admissions policy is unknown: The effects of gender rarity Journal of Applied Psychology. 86: 188-193. PMID 11393432 DOI: 10.1037//0021-9010.86.2.188  0.88
2001 Blader SL, Chang CC, Tyler TR. Procedural justice and retaliation in organizations: Comparing cross-nationally the importance of fair group processes International Journal of Conflict Management. 12: 295-311.  0.88
Show low-probability matches.