Year |
Citation |
Score |
2022 |
Jefferies LN, Lawrence R, Conlon E. The spatial extent of focused attention modulates attentional disengagement. Psychological Research. PMID 36264511 DOI: 10.1007/s00426-022-01747-y |
0.564 |
|
2021 |
Jefferies LN, Ambrose M, Di Lollo V. What factors influence the switch from unitary to divided attention? Psychological Research. PMID 33765178 DOI: 10.1007/s00426-021-01500-x |
0.367 |
|
2018 |
Jefferies LN, Di Lollo V. Sudden Events Change Old Visual Objects Into New Ones: A Possible Role for Phasic Activation of Locus Coeruleus. Psychological Science. 956797618807190. PMID 30426842 DOI: 10.1177/0956797618807190 |
0.404 |
|
2018 |
Gmeindl L, Jefferies LN, Yantis S. Attention scaling modulates the effective capacity of visual sensory memory. Psychological Research. PMID 30368559 DOI: 10.1007/S00426-018-1114-4 |
0.731 |
|
2018 |
Jefferies LN, Witt JB. First unitary, then divided: the temporal dynamics of dividing attention. Psychological Research. PMID 29691650 DOI: 10.1007/S00426-018-1018-3 |
0.598 |
|
2017 |
Jefferies LN, Enns JT, Di Lollo V. The exogenous and endogenous control of attentional focusing. Psychological Research. PMID 28939935 DOI: 10.1007/S00426-017-0918-Y |
0.577 |
|
2017 |
Jefferies LN, Di Lollo V. Deployment of spatial attention to a structural framework: exogenous (alerting) and endogenous (goal-directed) factors. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics. PMID 28718175 DOI: 10.3758/S13414-017-1378-6 |
0.44 |
|
2016 |
Jefferies L. Focusing on memory: Attentional focusing increases the effective capacity of visual working memory Journal of Vision. 16: 1055. DOI: 10.1167/16.12.1055 |
0.471 |
|
2015 |
Jefferies LN, Di Lollo V. When can spatial attention be deployed in the form of an annulus? Attention, Perception & Psychophysics. 77: 413-22. PMID 25341652 DOI: 10.3758/S13414-014-0790-4 |
0.529 |
|
2015 |
Jefferies LN, Roggeveen AB, Enns JT, Bennett PJ, Sekuler AB, Di Lollo V. On the time course of attentional focusing in older adults. Psychological Research. 79: 28-41. PMID 24337971 DOI: 10.1007/S00426-013-0528-2 |
0.454 |
|
2014 |
Jefferies LN, Gmeindl L, Yantis S. Attending to illusory differences in object size. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics. 76: 1393-402. PMID 24696380 DOI: 10.3758/S13414-014-0666-7 |
0.724 |
|
2014 |
Jefferies LN, Enns JT, Di Lollo V. The flexible focus: whether spatial attention is unitary or divided depends on observer goals. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance. 40: 465-70. PMID 24188402 DOI: 10.1037/A0034734 |
0.573 |
|
2012 |
Jefferies L, Gmeindl L, Yantis S. The breadth of attention modulates visible persistence Journal of Vision. 12: 568-568. DOI: 10.1167/12.9.568 |
0.706 |
|
2011 |
Jefferies LN, Gmeindl L, Yantis S. The distribution of visuospatial attention is influenced by illusory differences in the size of physically identical objects Journal of Vision. 11: 237-237. DOI: 10.1167/11.11.237 |
0.694 |
|
2011 |
Gmeindl L, Jefferies LN, Yantis S. Individual differences in the ability to restrict the breadth of attention are correlated with visuospatial working memory capacity Journal of Vision. 11: 1261-1261. DOI: 10.1167/11.11.1261 |
0.678 |
|
2010 |
Jefferies LN, Enns JT, Di Lollo V. Temporal dynamics of dividing spatial attention Journal of Vision. 9: 119-119. DOI: 10.1167/9.8.119 |
0.423 |
|
2010 |
Jefferies LN, Di Lollo V. Shrinking and shifting: Two alternative task-dependent modes of attentional control Journal of Vision. 8: 5-5. DOI: 10.1167/8.6.5 |
0.376 |
|
2010 |
Roggeveen A, Jefferies L, Sekuler A, Bennett P, DiLollo V. The creaky attentional gate: Temporal changes in the spatial extent of attention in elderly and young observers Journal of Vision. 8: 147-147. DOI: 10.1167/8.6.147 |
0.333 |
|
2010 |
Ghorashi S, Jefferies LN, Di Lollo V. Expansion and contraction of the attentional focus is influenced by top-down factors Journal of Vision. 8: 141-141. DOI: 10.1167/8.6.141 |
0.486 |
|
2010 |
Jefferies LN, Di Lollo V. Temporal dynamics in the expansion and contraction of the attentional window Journal of Vision. 7: 808-808. DOI: 10.1167/7.9.808 |
0.446 |
|
2010 |
Enns JT, Jefferies L, Smilek D, Eich E. Affect and arousal influence the attentional blink Journal of Vision. 7: 697-697. DOI: 10.1167/7.9.697 |
0.587 |
|
2010 |
Jefferies LN, Ghorashi S, Di Lollo V. How flexible and fast is the focus of attention? Evidence from the Attentional Blink and Lag-1 sparing Journal of Vision. 10: 287-287. DOI: 10.1167/10.7.287 |
0.591 |
|
2009 |
Jefferies LN, Di Lollo V. Linear changes in the spatial extent of the focus of attention across time. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance. 35: 1020-31. PMID 19653746 DOI: 10.1037/A0014258 |
0.502 |
|
2008 |
Jefferies LN, Smilek D, Eich E, Enns JT. Emotional valence and arousal interact in attentional control. Psychological Science. 19: 290-5. PMID 18315803 DOI: 10.1111/J.1467-9280.2008.02082.X |
0.45 |
|
2008 |
Ghorashi S, Jefferies LN, Kawahara JI, Watanabe K. Does attention accompany the conscious awareness of both location and identity of an object? Psyche (Pasadena). 14. |
0.518 |
|
2007 |
Jefferies LN, Ghorashi S, Kawahara J, Di Lollo V. Ignorance is bliss: the role of observer expectation in dynamic spatial tuning of the attentional focus. Perception & Psychophysics. 69: 1162-74. PMID 18038954 DOI: 10.3758/Bf03193953 |
0.331 |
|
2005 |
Jefferies LN, Wright RD, Di Lollo V. Inhibition of return to an occluded object depends on expectation. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance. 31: 1224-33. PMID 16366785 DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.31.6.1224 |
0.401 |
|
Show low-probability matches. |