| Year |
Citation |
Score |
| 2020 |
Sharma BP, Cho S. Using portfolio theory in spatial targeting of forest carbon payments: an effective strategy to address spatiotemporal variation in land-use opportunity costs? Canadian Journal of Forest Research. 50: 170-184. DOI: 10.1139/Cjfr-2019-0270 |
0.356 |
|
| 2020 |
Sharma BP, Cho S, Hellwinckel CM. Optimal Budget Allocations for Protected Area Acquisition To Store Carbon in a Local Community Under Economic Growth Uncertainty Agricultural and Resource Economics Review. 49: 209-236. DOI: 10.1017/Age.2020.10 |
0.307 |
|
| 2020 |
Mingie JC, Cho S. Spatial Targeting of Payments for Ecosystem Services under Growth Uncertainties Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy. 1-18. DOI: 10.1007/S12061-019-09329-Z |
0.356 |
|
| 2020 |
Cho S, Lee YG, Sharma BP, Hayes DJ. Do ecological–economic tradeoffs triggered by budget allocations for forest carbon sequestration change under different market conditions? Sustainability Science. 1-16. DOI: 10.1007/S11625-020-00844-4 |
0.368 |
|
| 2019 |
Liu X, Cho SH, Hayes DJ, Armsworth PR. Potential efficiency gains in payment programs from resolving spatial and temporal heterogeneity in the cost of supplying forest carbon. Journal of Environmental Management. 250: 109421. PMID 31476518 DOI: 10.1016/J.Jenvman.2019.109421 |
0.388 |
|
| 2019 |
Cho SH, Thiel K, Armsworth PR, Sharma BP. Effects of Protected Area Size on Conservation Return on Investment. Environmental Management. PMID 31001656 DOI: 10.1007/S00267-019-01164-9 |
0.338 |
|
| 2019 |
Cho S, Soh M, English BC, Yu TE, Boyer CN. Targeting payments for forest carbon sequestration given ecological and economic objectives Forest Policy and Economics. 100: 214-226. DOI: 10.1016/J.Forpol.2018.12.003 |
0.364 |
|
| 2019 |
Cho S, Sharma BP. Optimal spatial budget distribution of forest carbon payments that balances the returns and risks associated with conservation costs Environment, Development and Sustainability. 1-29. DOI: 10.1007/S10668-019-00486-2 |
0.359 |
|
| 2019 |
Kim Y, Cho S. How spatial targeting of incentive payments for forest carbon storage can be adjusted for competing land uses Regional Environmental Change. 19: 441-450. DOI: 10.1007/S10113-018-1411-X |
0.414 |
|
| 2018 |
Cho S, Lee J, Roberts R, Yu ET, Armsworth PR. Impact of market conditions on the effectiveness of payments for forest-based carbon sequestration Forest Policy and Economics. 92: 33-42. DOI: 10.1016/J.Forpol.2018.03.009 |
0.362 |
|
| 2017 |
Cho S, Lee J, Roberts RK, English BC, Yu ET, Kim T, Armsworth PR. Evaluating a tax-based subsidy approach for forest carbon sequestration Environmental Conservation. 44: 234-243. DOI: 10.1017/S0376892917000078 |
0.301 |
|
| 2016 |
Cho S, Lee D, Lambert DM, Roberts RK. Impacts of Highway Infrastructure Investment Under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Journal of the Transportation Research Forum. 55. DOI: 10.5399/Osu/Jtrf.55.2.4355 |
0.332 |
|
| 2016 |
Kwon S, Cho SH, Roberts RK, Kim HJ, Park K, Edward Yu T. Effects of electricity-price policy on electricity demand and manufacturing output Energy. 102: 324-334. DOI: 10.1016/J.Energy.2016.02.027 |
0.312 |
|
| 2016 |
Cho SH, Tanaka K, Wu J, Robert RK, Kim T. Effects of nuclear power plant shutdowns on electricity consumption and greenhouse gas emissions after the Tohoku Earthquake Energy Economics. 55: 223-233. DOI: 10.1016/J.Eneco.2016.01.014 |
0.543 |
|
| 2016 |
Chugh S, Yu TE, Jackson SW, Larson JA, English BC, Cho SH. Economic analysis of alternative logistics systems for Tennessee-produced switchgrass to penetrate energy markets Biomass and Bioenergy. 85: 25-34. DOI: 10.1016/J.Biombioe.2015.11.017 |
0.355 |
|
| 2016 |
Sutton NJ, Cho S, Armsworth PR. A reliance on agricultural land values in conservation planning alters the spatial distribution of priorities and overestimates the acquisition costs of protected areas Biological Conservation. 194: 2-10. DOI: 10.1016/J.Biocon.2015.11.021 |
0.391 |
|
| 2015 |
Cho SH, Bowker JM, Roberts RK, Kim S, Kim T, Lambert DM. Effects on consumer welfare of visitor satisfaction with recreation information availability: A case study of the Allegheny National Forest Tourism Economics. 21: 853-869. DOI: 10.5367/Te.2014.0383 |
0.348 |
|
| 2015 |
Cho SH, Kim SG, Roberts RK, Lambert DM, Kim T. Effects of land-related policies on land development during a real estate boom and a recession Growth and Change. 46: 218-232. DOI: 10.1111/Grow.12071 |
0.408 |
|
| 2015 |
Kim H, Cho SH, Kim Y. Home bias, risk differential, and cultural spatial spillover effects Journal of International Money and Finance. 51: 114-136. DOI: 10.1016/J.Jimonfin.2014.10.007 |
0.325 |
|
| 2015 |
Cho SH, Kim T, Kim HJ, Park K, Roberts RK. Regionally-varying and regionally-uniform electricity pricing policies compared across four usage categories Energy Economics. 49: 182-191. DOI: 10.1016/J.Eneco.2015.02.009 |
0.34 |
|
| 2015 |
Cho SH, Roberts RK, Lambert DM. A Dual-rate Property Tax: Exploring the Potential for Moderating the Effects of Sprawl on Development Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy. DOI: 10.1007/S12061-015-9150-6 |
0.385 |
|
| 2015 |
Cho SH, Lee J, Kim SG, Roberts RK. Impacts of Alternative Toll-Fee Structures on Highway Use Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy. 8: 27-44. DOI: 10.1007/S12061-014-9119-X |
0.349 |
|
| 2014 |
Cho SH, Roberts RK, Kim JY, Kim T. Spatial analysis of rezoning approval decisions Review of Urban and Regional Development Studies. 26: 97-111. DOI: 10.1111/Rurd.12023 |
0.387 |
|
| 2014 |
Cho SH, Kim H, Roberts RK, Kim T, Lee D. Effects of changes in forestland ownership on deforestation and urbanization and the resulting effects on greenhouse gas emissions Journal of Forest Economics. 20: 93-109. DOI: 10.1016/J.Jfe.2013.10.002 |
0.328 |
|
| 2014 |
Cho SH, Bowker JM, English DBK, Roberts RK, Kim T. Effects of travel cost and participation in recreational activities on national forest visits Forest Policy and Economics. 40: 21-30. DOI: 10.1016/J.Forpol.2013.12.004 |
0.365 |
|
| 2014 |
Cho SH, Kim T, Roberts RK, Hellwinckel C, Kim SG, Wilson B. Developing an amenity value calculator for urban forest landscapes Computers, Environment and Urban Systems. 43: 34-41. DOI: 10.1016/J.Compenvurbsys.2013.10.005 |
0.382 |
|
| 2013 |
Yu T“, Cho S, Koç AA, Bölük G, Kim SG, Lambert DM. Evaluating spatial and temporal variation in agricultural output elasticities in Turkey Agricultural Economics. 45: 279-290. DOI: 10.1111/Agec.12064 |
0.362 |
|
| 2013 |
Cho SH, Kim SG, Lambert DM, Roberts RK. Impact of a two-rate property tax on residential densities American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 95: 685-704. DOI: 10.1093/Ajae/Aas141 |
0.337 |
|
| 2013 |
Tong T, Yu TE, Cho S, Jensen K, Ugarte DDLT. Evaluating the spatial spillover effects of transportation infrastructure on agricultural output across the United States Journal of Transport Geography. 30: 47-55. DOI: 10.1016/J.Jtrangeo.2013.03.001 |
0.353 |
|
| 2013 |
Chadourne M, Cho SH, Roberts RK. Identifying priority target areas for the Knoxville-Knox County hillside and ridgetop protection plan: Using the value of visual amenity during the real estate boom of 2002-2007 and the recession of 2008 Annals of Regional Science. 50: 911-934. DOI: 10.1007/S00168-012-0519-Z |
0.372 |
|
| 2012 |
Cho SH, Jung S, Roberts RK, Kim SG. Interrelationship between poverty and the wildland-urban interface in metropolitan areas of the southern US Applied Economics. 44: 1405-1416. DOI: 10.1080/00036846.2010.541392 |
0.359 |
|
| 2012 |
Yu T", Cho S, Kim S. Assessing the Residential Property Tax Revenue Impact of a Shopping Center Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics. 45: 604-621. DOI: 10.1007/S11146-010-9292-X |
0.404 |
|
| 2012 |
Cho S, Kim J, Roberts RK, Kim SG. Neighborhood spillover effects between rezoning and housing price Annals of Regional Science. 48: 301-319. DOI: 10.1007/S00168-010-0401-9 |
0.4 |
|
| 2011 |
Cho SH, Kim SG, Roberts RK. Values of environmental landscape amenities during the 2000-2006 real estate boom and subsequent 2008 recession Journal of Environmental Planning and Management. 54: 71-91. DOI: 10.1080/09640568.2010.502760 |
0.42 |
|
| 2011 |
Cho SH, Gyu Kim S, Roberts RK. Measuring the Effects of a Land Value Tax on Land Development Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy. 4: 45-64. DOI: 10.1007/S12061-009-9039-3 |
0.398 |
|
| 2011 |
Lambert DM, Clark CD, Wilcox MD, Cho SH. Distance, density, local amenities, and suburban development preferences in a rapidly growing East Tennessee county Agriculture and Human Values. 28: 519-532. DOI: 10.1007/S10460-010-9306-6 |
0.387 |
|
| 2011 |
Cho SH, Lambert DM, Kim SG, Roberts RK, Park WM. Relationship between value of open space and distance from housing locations within a community Journal of Geographical Systems. 13: 393-414. DOI: 10.1007/S10109-010-0126-4 |
0.348 |
|
| 2010 |
Kim SG, Cho SH, Lambert DM, Roberts RK. Measuring the value of air quality: application of the spatial hedonic model. Air Quality, Atmosphere, & Health. 3: 41-51. PMID 20376167 DOI: 10.1007/S11869-009-0049-8 |
0.339 |
|
| 2010 |
Cho SH, Lambert DM, Roberts RK. Forecasting open space with a two-rate property tax Land Economics. 86: 263-280. DOI: 10.3368/Le.86.2.263 |
0.326 |
|
| 2010 |
Cho SH, Lambert DM, Roberts RK, Kim SG. Moderating urban sprawl: Is there a balance between shared open space and housing parcel size? Journal of Economic Geography. 10: 763-783. DOI: 10.1093/Jeg/Lbp048 |
0.317 |
|
| 2010 |
Cho S, Chen Z, Poudyal NC. Spatial structure of agricultural production in China Applied Economics. 42: 2031-2040. DOI: 10.1080/00036840701765320 |
0.356 |
|
| 2009 |
Cho SH, Jung S, Kim SG. Valuation of spatial configurations and forest types in the southern appalachian highlands. Environmental Management. 43: 628-44. PMID 18830739 DOI: 10.1007/S00267-008-9209-0 |
0.378 |
|
| 2009 |
Cho SH, Clark CD, Park WM, Kim SG. Spatial and temporal variation in the housing market values of lot size and open space Land Economics. 85: 51-73. DOI: 10.3368/Le.85.1.51 |
0.329 |
|
| 2009 |
Chen Z, Cho SH, Poudyal N, Roberts RK. Forecasting housing prices under different market segmentation assumptions Urban Studies. 46: 167-187. DOI: 10.1177/0042098008098641 |
0.305 |
|
| 2009 |
Poudyal NC, Hodges DG, Tonn B, Cho SH. Valuing diversity and spatial pattern of open space plots in urban neighborhoods Forest Policy and Economics. 11: 194-201. DOI: 10.1016/J.Forpol.2009.02.007 |
0.363 |
|
| 2009 |
Cho SH, Kim SG, Roberts RK, Jung S. Amenity values of spatial configurations of forest landscapes over space and time in the Southern Appalachian Highlands Ecological Economics. 68: 2646-2657. DOI: 10.1016/J.Ecolecon.2009.04.017 |
0.418 |
|
| 2008 |
Poudyal NC, Cho S, Hodges DG. Effects of urban sprawl on hunting participation in the southeastern United States. Southern Journal of Applied Forestry. 32: 134-138. DOI: 10.1093/Sjaf/32.3.134 |
0.302 |
|
| 2008 |
Cho S, Yen ST, Bowker JM, Newman DH. Modeling Willingness to Pay for Land Conservation Easements: Treatment of Zero and Protest Bids and Application and Policy Implications Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics. 40: 267-285. DOI: 10.1017/S1074070800028108 |
0.306 |
|
| 2008 |
Cho SH, Poudyal N, Lambert DM. Estimating spatially varying effects of urban growth boundaries on land development and land value Land Use Policy. 25: 320-329. DOI: 10.1016/J.Landusepol.2007.08.004 |
0.421 |
|
| 2008 |
Cho SH, Poudyal NC, Roberts RK. Spatial analysis of the amenity value of green open space Ecological Economics. 66: 403-416. DOI: 10.1016/J.Ecolecon.2007.10.012 |
0.422 |
|
| 2007 |
Cho SH, Roberts RK. Cure for urban sprawl: Measuring the ratio of marginal implicit prices of density-to-lot-size Review of Agricultural Economics. 29: 572-579. DOI: 10.1111/J.1467-9353.2007.00372.X |
0.347 |
|
| 2007 |
Cho S, Omitaomu OA, Poudyal NC, Eastwood DB. The Impact of an Urban Growth Boundary on Land Development in Knox County, Tennessee: A Comparison of Two-Stage Probit Least Squares and Multilayer Neural Network Models Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics. 39: 701-717. DOI: 10.1017/S1074070800023361 |
0.336 |
|
| 2007 |
Cho S, Kim SG, Clark CD, Park WM. Spatial Analysis of Rural Economic Development Using a Locally Weighted Regression Model Agricultural and Resource Economics Review. 36: 24-38. DOI: 10.1017/S1068280500009424 |
0.39 |
|
| 2007 |
Wu J, Cho S. The effect of local land use regulations on urban development in the Western United States Regional Science and Urban Economics. 37: 69-86. DOI: 10.1016/J.Regsciurbeco.2006.06.008 |
0.504 |
|
| 2006 |
Cho S, Bowker JM, Park WM. Measuring the Contribution of Water and Green Space Amenities to Housing Values: An Application and Comparison of Spatially Weighted Hedonic Models Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics. 31: 485-507. DOI: 10.22004/Ag.Econ.8630 |
0.333 |
|
| 2006 |
Cho S, Clark CD, Park WM. Two Dimensions of the Spatial Distribution of Housing: Dependency and Heterogeneity across Tennessee's Six Metropolitan Statistical Areas Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics. 38: 299-316. DOI: 10.1017/S1074070800022343 |
0.349 |
|
| 2006 |
Cho S, Chen Z, Yen ST, Eastwood DB. Estimating Effects of an Urban Growth Boundary on Land Development Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics. 38: 287-298. DOI: 10.1017/S1074070800022331 |
0.377 |
|
| 2005 |
Cho S, Newman DH, Wear DN. Community Choices and Housing Demands: A Spatial Analysis of the Southern Appalachian Highlands Housing Studies. 20: 549-569. DOI: 10.1080/02673030500114433 |
0.359 |
|
| 2005 |
Cho S, Newman DH. Spatial analysis of rural land development Forest Policy and Economics. 7: 732-744. DOI: 10.1016/J.Forpol.2005.03.008 |
0.39 |
|
| 2005 |
Cho SH, Newman DH, Bowker JM. Measuring rural homeowners' willingness to pay for land conservation easements Forest Policy and Economics. 7: 757-770. DOI: 10.1016/J.Forpol.2005.03.007 |
0.384 |
|
| 2003 |
Wu J, Cho SH. Estimating households' preferences for environmental amenities using equilibrium models of local jurisdictions Scottish Journal of Political Economy. 50: 189-206. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9485.5002005 |
0.456 |
|
| 2003 |
Cho SH, Wu JJ, Boggess WG. Measuring interactions among urbanization, land use regulations, and public finance American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 85: 988-999. DOI: 10.1111/1467-8276.00502 |
0.503 |
|
| Show low-probability matches. |