| Year |
Citation |
Score |
| 2021 |
Anderson JL, Plantz J, Glocker S, Zapf PA. The MacCAT-CA and the ECST-R in Competency to Stand Trial Evaluations: A Critical Review and Practical Implications. Journal of Personality Assessment. 1-8. PMID 34878964 DOI: 10.1080/00223891.2021.2006671 |
0.331 |
|
| 2018 |
Pirelli G, Hartigan S, Zapf PA. Using the Internet for collateral information in forensic mental health evaluations. Behavioral Sciences & the Law. PMID 29575261 DOI: 10.1002/Bsl.2334 |
0.388 |
|
| 2018 |
Beltrani A, Reed AL, Zapf PA, Otto RK. Is Hindsight Really 20/20?: The Impact of Outcome Information on the Decision-Making Process International Journal of Forensic Mental Health. 17: 285-296. DOI: 10.1080/14999013.2018.1505790 |
0.339 |
|
| 2018 |
Zapf PA, Kukucka J, Kassin SM, Dror IE. Cognitive bias in forensic mental health assessment: Evaluator beliefs about its nature and scope. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law. 24: 1-10. DOI: 10.1037/Law0000153 |
0.371 |
|
| 2018 |
Dror IE, Kukucka J, Kassin SM, Zapf PA. When Expert Decision Making Goes Wrong: Consensus, Bias, the Role of Experts, and Accuracy Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition. 7: 162-163. DOI: 10.1016/J.Jarmac.2018.01.007 |
0.324 |
|
| 2017 |
Brown JM, Haun J, Zapf PA, Brown NN. Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorders (FASD) and competency to stand trial (CST): Suggestions for a 'best practices' approach to forensic evaluation. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry. PMID 28502700 DOI: 10.1016/J.Ijlp.2017.04.002 |
0.33 |
|
| 2017 |
Zapf PA, Dror IE. Understanding and Mitigating Bias in Forensic Evaluation: Lessons from Forensic Science International Journal of Forensic Mental Health. 16: 227-238. DOI: 10.1080/14999013.2017.1317302 |
0.363 |
|
| 2017 |
Kukucka J, Kassin SM, Zapf PA, Dror IE. Cognitive Bias and Blindness: A Global Survey of Forensic Science Examiners Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition. 6: 452-459. DOI: 10.1016/J.Jarmac.2017.09.001 |
0.362 |
|
| 2015 |
Zottoli TM, Daftary-Kapur T, Zapf PA. We Don’t Always Mean What We Say: Attitudes Toward Statutory Exclusion of Juvenile Offenders From Juvenile Court Jurisdiction Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice. 15: 423-448. DOI: 10.1080/15228932.2015.1099335 |
0.341 |
|
| 2011 |
Zapf PA, Roesch R. Future Directions in the Restoration of Competency to Stand Trial Current Directions in Psychological Science. 20: 43-47. DOI: 10.1177/0963721410396798 |
0.333 |
|
| 2011 |
Ryba NL, Zapf PA. The Influence of Psychiatric Symptoms and Cognitive Abilities on Competence-Related Abilities International Journal of Forensic Mental Health. 10: 29-40. DOI: 10.1080/14999013.2010.550982 |
0.718 |
|
| 2011 |
Pirelli G, Zapf PA, Gottdiener WH. Competency to stand trial research: Guidelines and future directions Journal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology. 22: 340-370. DOI: 10.1080/14789949.2011.552622 |
0.324 |
|
| 2011 |
Pirelli G, Gottdiener WH, Zapf PA. A Meta-Analytic review of competency to stand trial research Psychology, Public Policy, and Law. 17: 1-53. DOI: 10.1037/A0021713 |
0.366 |
|
| 2010 |
Rosenfeld B, Green D, Pivovarova E, Dole T, Zapf P. What to do with Contradictory Data? Approaches to the Integration of Multiple Malingering Measures International Journal of Forensic Mental Health. 9: 63-73. DOI: 10.1080/14999013.2010.499559 |
0.31 |
|
| 2009 |
Pivovarova E, Rosenfeld B, Dole T, Green D, Zapf P. Are Measures of Cognitive Effort and Motivation Useful in Differentiating Feigned from Genuine Psychiatric Symptoms? International Journal of Forensic Mental Health. 8: 271-278. DOI: 10.1080/14999011003635514 |
0.406 |
|
| 2008 |
Cooper VG, Zapf PA. Psychiatric patients' comprehension of Miranda rights. Law and Human Behavior. 32: 390-405. PMID 17674169 DOI: 10.1007/S10979-007-9099-3 |
0.747 |
|
| 2008 |
Green D, Rosenfeld B, Dole T, Pivovarova E, Zapf PA. Validation of an abbreviated version of the structured interview of reported symptoms in outpatient psychiatric and community settings. Law and Human Behavior. 32: 177-86. PMID 17558482 DOI: 10.1007/S10979-007-9089-5 |
0.396 |
|
| 2008 |
Jacobs MS, Ryba NL, Zapf PA. Competence-related abilities and psychiatric symptoms: an analysis of the underlying structure and correlates of the MacCAT-CA and the BPRS. Law and Human Behavior. 32: 64-77. PMID 17546483 DOI: 10.1007/S10979-007-9086-8 |
0.72 |
|
| 2008 |
Pirelli G, Zapf PA. An investigation of psychologists' practices and attitudes toward participation in capital evaluations Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice. 8: 39-66. DOI: 10.1080/15228930801947294 |
0.382 |
|
| 2008 |
Murrie DC, Boccaccini MT, Zapf PA, Warren JI, Henderson CE. CLINICIAN VARIATION IN FINDINGS OF COMPETENCE TO STAND TRIAL Psychology, Public Policy, and Law. 14: 177-193. DOI: 10.1037/A0013578 |
0.429 |
|
| 2007 |
Viljoen JL, Zapf PA, Roesch R. Adjudicative competence and comprehension of Miranda rights in adolescent defendants: a comparison of legal standards. Behavioral Sciences & the Law. 25: 1-19. PMID 17285585 DOI: 10.1002/Bsl.714 |
0.339 |
|
| 2006 |
Brannen DN, Salekin RT, Zapf PA, Salekin KL, Kubak FA, DeCoster J. Transfer to adult court: A national study of how juvenile court judges weigh pertinent Kent criteria Psychology, Public Policy, and Law. 12: 332-355. DOI: 10.1037/1076-8971.12.3.332 |
0.411 |
|
| 2005 |
Zapf PA, Skeem JL, Golding SL. Factor structure and validity of the MacArthur Competence Assessment Tool-Criminal Adjudication. Psychological Assessment. 17: 433-45. PMID 16393010 DOI: 10.1037/1040-3590.17.4.433 |
0.326 |
|
| 2005 |
Zapf PA, Roesch R. An investigation of the construct of competence: a comparison of the FIT, the MacCAT-CA, and the MacCAT-T. Law and Human Behavior. 29: 229-52. PMID 15912726 DOI: 10.1007/S10979-005-2194-4 |
0.388 |
|
| 2005 |
Brodsky SL, Zapf PA, Boccaccini MT. Competency for execution assessments: Ethical continuities and professional tasks Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice. 5: 65-74. DOI: 10.1300/J158V05N04_04 |
0.425 |
|
| 2005 |
Ackerson KS, Brodsky SL, Zapf PA. Judges' and psychologists' assessments of legal and clinical factors in competence for execution Psychology, Public Policy, and Law. 11: 164-193. DOI: 10.1037/1076-8971.11.1.164 |
0.361 |
|
| 2004 |
Zapf PA, Hubbard KL, Cooper VG, Wheeles MC, Ronan KA. Have the Courts Abdicated Their Responsibility for Determination of Competency to Stand Trial to Clinicians? Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice. 4: 27-44. DOI: 10.1300/J158V04N01_02 |
0.755 |
|
| 2004 |
Viljoen JL, Zapf PA, Roesch R. Diagnosis, Current Symptomatology, and the Ability to Stand Trial Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice. 3: 23-37. DOI: 10.1300/J158V03N04_02 |
0.392 |
|
| 2004 |
Cooper VG, Mclearen AM, Zapf PA. Dispositional Decisions with the Mentally Ill: Police Perceptions and Characteristics Police Quarterly. 7: 295-310. DOI: 10.1177/1098611104267733 |
0.735 |
|
| 2003 |
Cooper VG, Zapf PA. Predictor variables in competency to stand trial decisions. Law and Human Behavior. 27: 423-36. PMID 12916229 DOI: 10.1023/A:1024089117535 |
0.746 |
|
| 2003 |
Zapf PA, Viljoen JL. Issues and considerations regarding the use of assessment instruments in the evaluation of competency to stand trial. Behavioral Sciences & the Law. 21: 351-67. PMID 12808695 DOI: 10.1002/Bsl.535 |
0.425 |
|
| 2003 |
Hubbard KL, Zapf PA, Ronan KA. Competency restoration: an examination of the differences between defendants predicted restorable and not restorable to competency. Law and Human Behavior. 27: 127-39. PMID 12733417 DOI: 10.1023/A:1022566328781 |
0.407 |
|
| 2003 |
Zapf PA, Boccaccini MT, Brodsky SL. Assessment of competency for execution: professional guidelines and an evaluation checklist. Behavioral Sciences & the Law. 21: 103-20. PMID 12579621 DOI: 10.1002/Bsl.491 |
0.432 |
|
| 2003 |
Ryba N, Cooper V, Zapf P. Assessment of Maturity in Juvenile Competency to Stand Trial Evaluations: A Survey of Practitioners Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice. 3: 23-45. DOI: 10.1300/J158V03N03_02 |
0.762 |
|
| 2003 |
Hubbard KL, Zapf PA. The Role of Demographic, Criminal, and Psychiatric Variables in Examiners' Predictions of Restorability to Competency to Stand Trial International Journal of Forensic Mental Health. 2: 145-155. DOI: 10.1080/14999013.2003.10471186 |
0.373 |
|
| 2003 |
Viljoen JL, Roesch R, Ogloff JRP, Zapf PA. The Role of Canadian Psychologists in Conducting Fitness and Criminal Responsibility Evaluations. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne. 44: 369-381. DOI: 10.1037/H0086959 |
0.451 |
|
| 2003 |
Ryba NL, Cooper VG, Zapf PA. Juvenile competence to stand trial evaluations: A survey of current practices and test usage among psychologists. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice. 34: 499-507. DOI: 10.1037/0735-7028.34.5.499 |
0.672 |
|
| 2002 |
Viljoen JL, Roesch R, Zapf PA. Interrater reliability of the Fitness Interview Test across 4 professional groups. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry. Revue Canadienne De Psychiatrie. 47: 945-52. PMID 12553130 DOI: 10.1177/070674370204701006 |
0.338 |
|
| 2002 |
Viljoen JL, Roesch R, Zapf PA. An examination of the relationship between competency to stand trial, competency to waive interrogation rights, and psychopathology. Law and Human Behavior. 26: 481-506. PMID 12412494 DOI: 10.1023/A:1020299804821 |
0.341 |
|
| 2002 |
Viljoen JL, Zapf PA. Fitness to Stand Trial Evaluations: A Comparison of Referred and Non-Referred Defendants International Journal of Forensic Mental Health. 1: 127-138. DOI: 10.1080/14999013.2002.10471168 |
0.378 |
|
| 2001 |
Zapf PA, Roesch R, Viljoen JL. Assessing fitness to stand trial: the utility of the Fitness Interview Test (revised edition). Canadian Journal of Psychiatry. Revue Canadienne De Psychiatrie. 46: 426-32. PMID 11441782 DOI: 10.1177/070674370104600508 |
0.376 |
|
| 2001 |
Zapf PA, Roesch R. A comparison of the MacCAT-CA and the FIT for making determinations of competency to stand trial. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry. 24: 81-92. PMID 11346993 DOI: 10.1016/S0160-2527(00)00073-X |
0.365 |
|
| 2001 |
Brodsky SL, Zapf PA, Boccaccini MT. The last competency: An examination of legal, ethical, and professional ambiguities regarding evaluations of competence for execution Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice. 1: 1-25. DOI: 10.1300/J158V01N02_01 |
0.454 |
|
| 1997 |
Roesch R, Ogloff JRP, Hart SD, Dempster RJ, Zapf PA, Whittemore KE. The impact of Canadian Criminal Code changes on remands and assessments of fitness to stand trial and criminal responsibility in British Columbia Canadian Journal of Psychiatry. 42: 509-514. PMID 9220115 DOI: 10.1177/070674379704200508 |
0.421 |
|
| 1996 |
Roesch R, Hart SD, Zapf PA. Conceptualizing and assessing competency to stand trial: Implications and applications of the MacArthur Treatment Competence Model. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law. 2: 96-113. DOI: 10.1037/1076-8971.2.1.96 |
0.322 |
|
| Show low-probability matches. |