| Year |
Citation |
Score |
| 2017 |
Zhai X, Chakraborty DP. A bivariate contaminated binormal model for robust fitting of proper ROC curves to a pair of correlated, possibly degenerate, ROC datasets. Medical Physics. PMID 28382718 DOI: 10.1002/Mp.12263 |
0.331 |
|
| 2017 |
Hillis SL, Chakraborty DP, Orton CG. ROC or FROC? It depends on the research question. Medical Physics. PMID 28168710 DOI: 10.1002/Mp.12151 |
0.378 |
|
| 2016 |
Dobbins JT, McAdams HP, Sabol JM, Chakraborty DP, Kazerooni EA, Reddy GP, Vikgren J, Båth M. Multi-Institutional Evaluation of Digital Tomosynthesis, Dual-Energy Radiography, and Conventional Chest Radiography for the Detection and Management of Pulmonary Nodules. Radiology. 150497. PMID 27439324 DOI: 10.1148/Radiol.2016150497 |
0.438 |
|
| 2016 |
Chakraborty DP, Zhai X. On the meaning of the weighted alternative free-response operating characteristic figure of merit. Medical Physics. 43: 2548. PMID 27147365 DOI: 10.1118/1.4947125 |
0.349 |
|
| 2016 |
Mackenzie A, Warren LM, Wallis MG, Given-Wilson RM, Cooke J, Dance DR, Chakraborty DP, Halling-Brown MD, Looney PT, Young KC. The relationship between cancer detection in mammography and image quality measurements. Physica Medica : Pm : An International Journal Devoted to the Applications of Physics to Medicine and Biology : Official Journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics (Aifb). PMID 27061872 DOI: 10.1016/J.Ejmp.2016.03.004 |
0.46 |
|
| 2016 |
Thompson JD, Chakraborty DP, Szczepura K, Tootell AK, Vamvakas I, Manning DJ, Hogg P. Effect of reconstruction methods and x-ray tube current-time product on nodule detection in an anthropomorphic thorax phantom: A crossed-modality JAFROC observer study. Medical Physics. 43: 1265. PMID 26936711 DOI: 10.1118/1.4941017 |
0.431 |
|
| 2015 |
Thompson JD, Chakraborty DP, Szczepura K, Vamvakas I, Tootell A, Manning DJ, Hogg P. A phantom-based JAFROC observer study of two CT reconstruction methods: The search for optimisation of lesion detection and effective dose Progress in Biomedical Optics and Imaging - Proceedings of Spie. 9416. DOI: 10.1117/12.2081632 |
0.428 |
|
| 2014 |
Warren LM, Given-Wilson RM, Wallis MG, Cooke J, Halling-Brown MD, Mackenzie A, Chakraborty DP, Bosmans H, Dance DR, Young KC. The effect of image processing on the detection of cancers in digital mammography. Ajr. American Journal of Roentgenology. 203: 387-93. PMID 25055275 DOI: 10.2214/Ajr.13.11812 |
0.438 |
|
| 2014 |
Thompson JD, Hogg P, Manning DJ, Szczepura K, Chakraborty DP. A free-response evaluation determining value in the computed tomography attenuation correction image for revealing pulmonary incidental findings: a phantom study. Academic Radiology. 21: 538-45. PMID 24594424 DOI: 10.1016/J.Acra.2014.01.003 |
0.38 |
|
| 2014 |
Soh BP, Lee WB, McEntee MF, Kench PL, Reed WM, Heard R, Chakraborty DP, Brennan PC. Mammography test sets: reading location and prior images do not affect group performance. Clinical Radiology. 69: 397-402. PMID 24418670 DOI: 10.1016/J.Crad.2013.11.010 |
0.42 |
|
| 2014 |
Mackenzie A, Warren LM, Dance DR, Chakraborty DP, Cooke J, Halling-Brown MD, Looney PT, Wallis MG, Given-Wilson RM, Alexander GG, Young KC. Using image simulation to test the effect of detector type on breast cancer detection Progress in Biomedical Optics and Imaging - Proceedings of Spie. 9037. DOI: 10.1117/12.2043423 |
0.437 |
|
| 2013 |
Chakraborty DP. A brief history of free-response receiver operating characteristic paradigm data analysis. Academic Radiology. 20: 915-9. PMID 23583665 DOI: 10.1016/J.Acra.2013.03.001 |
0.426 |
|
| 2013 |
Soh BP, Lee W, McEntee MF, Kench PL, Reed WM, Heard R, Chakraborty DP, Brennan PC. Screening mammography: test set data can reasonably describe actual clinical reporting. Radiology. 268: 46-53. PMID 23481165 DOI: 10.1148/Radiol.13122399 |
0.325 |
|
| 2013 |
Haygood TM, Ryan J, Brennan PC, Li S, Marom EM, McEntee MF, Itani M, Evanoff M, Chakraborty D. On the choice of acceptance radius in free-response observer performance studies British Journal of Radiology. 86. PMID 22573302 DOI: 10.1259/Bjr/42313554 |
0.427 |
|
| 2013 |
Mackenzie A, Warren L, Cooke J, Halling-Brown M, Looney P, Chakraborty D, Wallis M, Given-Wilson R, Young K. PB.23: Effect of detector type on cancer detection in digital mammography Breast Cancer Research. 15: 23. DOI: 10.1186/Bcr3523 |
0.463 |
|
| 2013 |
Warren LM, Cooke J, Given-Wilson RM, Wallis MG, Halling-Brown M, Mackenzie A, Chakraborty DP, Bosmans H, Dance DR, Young KC. Effect of image processing version on detection of non-calcification cancers in 2D digital mammography imaging Proceedings of Spie - the International Society For Optical Engineering. 8673. DOI: 10.1117/12.2008494 |
0.404 |
|
| 2012 |
Chakraborty DP, Yoon HJ, Mello-Thoms C. Application of threshold-bias independent analysis to eye-tracking and FROC data. Academic Radiology. 19: 1474-83. PMID 23040503 DOI: 10.1016/J.Acra.2012.09.002 |
0.367 |
|
| 2012 |
Warren LM, Mackenzie A, Cooke J, Given-Wilson RM, Wallis MG, Chakraborty DP, Dance DR, Bosmans H, Young KC. Effect of image quality on calcification detection in digital mammography. Medical Physics. 39: 3202-13. PMID 22755704 DOI: 10.1118/1.4718571 |
0.455 |
|
| 2012 |
Svahn TM, Chakraborty DP, Ikeda D, Zackrisson S, Do Y, Mattsson S, Andersson I. Breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography: A comparison of diagnostic accuracy British Journal of Radiology. 85: e1074-e1082. PMID 22674710 DOI: 10.1259/Bjr/53282892 |
0.348 |
|
| 2012 |
Chakraborty DP, Haygood TM, Ryan J, Marom EM, Evanoff M, McEntee MF, Brennan PC. Quantifying the clinical relevance of a laboratory observer performance paradigm British Journal of Radiology. 85: 1287-1302. PMID 22573296 DOI: 10.1259/Bjr/45866310 |
0.369 |
|
| 2012 |
Chakraborty DP. Measuring agreement between rating interpretations and binary clinical interpretations of images: A simulation study of methods for quantifying the clinical relevance of an observer performance paradigm Physics in Medicine and Biology. 57: 2873-2904. PMID 22516804 DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/57/10/2873 |
0.393 |
|
| 2012 |
Dong L, Chen Y, Gale AG, Chakraborty DP. A potential method to identify poor breast screening performance Proceedings of Spie. 8318: 831819. DOI: 10.1117/12.913610 |
0.334 |
|
| 2012 |
Chakraborty DP, Yoon H, Mello-Thoms C. Inverse dependence of search and classification performances in lesion localization tasks Proceedings of Spie. 8318. DOI: 10.1117/12.911820 |
0.366 |
|
| 2012 |
Warren LM, Mackenzie A, Cooke J, Given-Wilson R, Wallis MG, Chakraborty DP, Dance DR, Young KC. Mammographic calcification cluster detection and threshold gold thickness measurements Progress in Biomedical Optics and Imaging - Proceedings of Spie. 8313. DOI: 10.1117/12.911434 |
0.418 |
|
| 2011 |
Chakraborty DP. New developments in observer performance methodology in medical imaging Seminars in Nuclear Medicine. 41: 401-418. PMID 21978444 DOI: 10.1053/J.Semnuclmed.2011.07.001 |
0.443 |
|
| 2011 |
Chakraborty DP. Recent developments in imaging system assessment methodology, FROC analysis and the search model. Nuclear Instruments & Methods in Physics Research. Section a, Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment. 648: S297-S301. PMID 21804679 DOI: 10.1016/J.Nima.2010.11.042 |
0.46 |
|
| 2011 |
Chakraborty DP. How Many Readers and Cases does One Need to Conduct an ROC Study? Academic Radiology. 18: 127-128. PMID 21232680 DOI: 10.1016/J.Acra.2010.12.003 |
0.342 |
|
| 2011 |
Warren L, Mackenzie A, Cooke J, Given-Wilson R, Wallis M, Chakraborty D, Young K. Dependence of detectability of microcalcification clusters on quality of mammography images Breast Cancer Research. 13: 23. DOI: 10.1186/Bcr2975 |
0.374 |
|
| 2011 |
Chakraborty D. SU‐E‐I‐117: Quantifying Search and Classification Performance in Lesion Localization Tasks Medical Physics. 38: 3422-3422. DOI: 10.1118/1.3611691 |
0.403 |
|
| 2011 |
Chakraborty DP, Svahn T. Estimating the parameters of a model of visual search from ROC data: an alternate method for fitting proper ROC curves Proceedings of Spie. 7966. DOI: 10.1117/12.878231 |
0.342 |
|
| 2011 |
Chakraborty DP. Recent developments in imaging system assessment methodology, FROC analysis and the search model Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research, Section a: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment. 648. DOI: 10.1016/j.nima.2010.11.042 |
0.354 |
|
| 2010 |
Chakraborty DP. Prediction Accuracy of a Sample-size Estimation Method for ROC Studies Academic Radiology. 17: 628-638. PMID 20380980 DOI: 10.1016/J.Acra.2010.01.007 |
0.329 |
|
| 2010 |
Svahn T, Andersson I, Chakraborty D, Svensson S, Ikeda D, Förnvik D, Mattsson S, Tingberg A, Zackrisson S. The Diagnostic Accuracy Of Dual-View Digital Mammography, Single-View Breast Tomosynthesis And A Dual-View Combination Of Breast Tomosynthesis And Digital Mammography In A Free-Response Observer Performance Study. Radiation Protection Dosimetry. 139: 113-117. PMID 20228048 DOI: 10.1093/Rpd/Ncq044 |
0.423 |
|
| 2010 |
Zanca F, Chakraborty DP, Marchal G, Bosmans H. Consistency of methods for analysing location-specific data. Radiation Protection Dosimetry. 139: 52-56. PMID 20159917 DOI: 10.1093/Rpd/Ncq030 |
0.414 |
|
| 2010 |
Chakraborty DP. Clinical relevance of the ROC and free-response paradigms for comparing imaging system efficacies Radiation Protection Dosimetry. 139: 37-41. PMID 20139268 DOI: 10.1093/Rpd/Ncq017 |
0.402 |
|
| 2010 |
Toomey RJ, Ryan JT, McEntee MF, Evanoff MG, Chakraborty DP, McNulty JP, Manning DJ, Thomas EM, Brennan PC. Diagnostic efficacy of handheld devices for emergency radiologic consultation. Ajr. American Journal of Roentgenology. 194: 469-74. PMID 20093611 DOI: 10.2214/Ajr.09.3418 |
0.326 |
|
| 2010 |
Chakraborty DP. A Status report on free-response analysis Radiation Protection Dosimetry. 139: 20-25. PMID 20085898 DOI: 10.1093/Rpd/Ncp305 |
0.446 |
|
| 2010 |
Chakraborty DP, Zanca F. Measuring modality ordering consistency of observer performance paradigms Proceedings of Spie. 7627: 762711. DOI: 10.1117/12.844997 |
0.376 |
|
| 2009 |
Chakraborty DP. Counterpoint to "Performance Assessment of Diagnostic Systems Under the FROC Paradigm" by Gur and Rockette Academic Radiology. 16: 507-510. PMID 19268864 DOI: 10.1016/J.Acra.2008.12.011 |
0.415 |
|
| 2009 |
Chakraborty D. WE‐E‐304A‐07: Clinically Relevant FROC Analysis Medical Physics. 36: 2787-2787. DOI: 10.1118/1.3182577 |
0.361 |
|
| 2009 |
Chakraborty DP, Yoon H. JAFROC analysis revisited: figure-of-merit considerations for human observer studies Proceedings of Spie. 7263. DOI: 10.1117/12.810859 |
0.435 |
|
| 2008 |
Chakraborty DP. Validation and Statistical Power Comparison of Methods for Analyzing Free-response Observer Performance Studies Academic Radiology. 15: 1554-1566. PMID 19000872 DOI: 10.1016/J.Acra.2008.07.018 |
0.35 |
|
| 2008 |
Zanca F, Chakraborty DP, Van Ongeval C, Jacobs J, Claus F, Marchal G, Bosmans H. An improved method for simulating microcalcifications in digital mammograms. Medical Physics. 35: 4012-8. PMID 18841852 DOI: 10.1118/1.2968334 |
0.386 |
|
| 2008 |
Chakraborty DP, Yoon HJ. Operating characteristics predicted by models for diagnostic tasks involving lesion localization. Medical Physics. 35: 435-45. PMID 18383663 DOI: 10.1118/1.2820902 |
0.347 |
|
| 2008 |
Brennan PC, Ryan J, Evanoff M, Toomey R, O'Beirne A, Manning D, Chakraborty DP, McEntee M. The Impact of Acoustic Noise Found Within Clinical Departments on Radiology Performance Academic Radiology. 15: 472-476. PMID 18342772 DOI: 10.1016/J.Acra.2007.12.005 |
0.366 |
|
| 2007 |
Svahn T, Hemdal B, Ruschin M, Chakraborty DP, Andersson I, Tingberg A, Mattsson S. Dose reduction and its influence on diagnostic accuracy and radiation risk in digital mammography: an observer performance study using an anthropomorphic breast phantom British Journal of Radiology. 80: 557-562. PMID 17704316 DOI: 10.1259/Bjr/29933797 |
0.349 |
|
| 2007 |
Yoon HJ, Zheng B, Sahiner B, Chakraborty DP. Evaluating computer-aided detection algorithms. Medical Physics. 34: 2024-38. PMID 17654906 DOI: 10.1118/1.2736289 |
0.429 |
|
| 2007 |
Ruschin M, Timberg P, Båth M, Hemdal B, Svahn T, Saunders RS, Samei E, Andersson I, Mattsson S, Chakraborty DP, Tingberg A. Dose dependence of mass and microcalcification detection in digital mammography: Free response human observer studies Medical Physics. 34: 400-407. PMID 17388156 DOI: 10.1118/1.2405324 |
0.446 |
|
| 2007 |
Chakraborty D, Yoon HJ, Mello-Thoms C. Spatial localization accuracy of radiologists in free-response studies: Inferring perceptual FROC curves from mark-rating data. Academic Radiology. 14: 4-18. PMID 17178361 DOI: 10.1016/J.Acra.2006.10.015 |
0.406 |
|
| 2007 |
Chakraborty D, Yoon HJ. TH‐C‐L100F‐09: Operating Characteristics Predicted by Models of Location Specific Diagnostic Tasks Medical Physics. 34: 2620-2621. DOI: 10.1118/1.2761636 |
0.372 |
|
| 2007 |
Chakraborty D, Yoon H. TH‐C‐L100F‐07: FROC Curves Without Arbitrary Scoring of Marks: Perceptual Vs. Scored Analysis of CAD Data Medical Physics. 34: 2620-2620. DOI: 10.1118/1.2761634 |
0.367 |
|
| 2007 |
Chakraborty DP. FROC curves using a model of visual search Progress in Biomedical Optics and Imaging - Proceedings of Spie. 6515. DOI: 10.1117/12.699222 |
0.339 |
|
| 2006 |
Chakraborty DP. An alternate method for using a visual discrimination model (VDM) to optimize soft-copy display image quality. Journal of the Society For Information Display. 14: 921-926. PMID 17710120 DOI: 10.1889/1.2372426 |
0.393 |
|
| 2006 |
Chakraborty DP. Analysis of Location Specific Observer Performance Data: Validated Extensions of the Jackknife Free-Response (JAFROC) Method Academic Radiology. 13: 1187-1193. PMID 16979067 DOI: 10.1016/J.Acra.2006.06.016 |
0.461 |
|
| 2006 |
Chakraborty DP. ROC curves predicted by a model of visual search Physics in Medicine and Biology. 51: 3463-3482. PMID 16825743 DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/51/14/013 |
0.46 |
|
| 2006 |
Chakraborty DP. A search model and figure of merit for observer data acquired according to the free-response paradigm Physics in Medicine and Biology. 51: 3449-3462. PMID 16825742 DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/51/14/012 |
0.405 |
|
| 2006 |
Chakraborty D. TU‐D‐330A‐02: A Search Model for Medical Image Interpretations Medical Physics. 33: 2195-2195. DOI: 10.1118/1.2241547 |
0.397 |
|
| 2005 |
Penedo M, Souto M, Tahoces PG, Carreira JM, Villalón J, Porto G, Seoane C, Vidal JJ, Berbaum KS, Chakraborty DP, Fajardo LL. Free-response receiver operating characteristic evaluation of lossy JPEG2000 and object-based set partitioning in hierarchical trees compression of digitized mammograms. Radiology. 237: 450-7. PMID 16244253 DOI: 10.1148/Radiol.2372040996 |
0.415 |
|
| 2005 |
Chakraborty DP. Recent advances in observer performance methodology: Jackknife free-response ROC (JAFROC) Radiation Protection Dosimetry. 114: 26-31. PMID 15933077 DOI: 10.1093/Rpd/Nch512 |
0.42 |
|
| 2005 |
Samei E, Badano A, Chakraborty D, Compton K, Cornelius C, Corrigan K, Flynn MJ, Hemminger B, Hangiandreou N, Johnson J, Moxley-Stevens DM, Pavlicek W, Roehrig H, Rutz L, Shepard J, et al. Assessment of display performance for medical imaging systems: executive summary of AAPM TG18 report. Medical Physics. 32: 1205-25. PMID 15895604 DOI: 10.1118/1.1861159 |
0.346 |
|
| 2005 |
Zheng B, Chakraborty DP, Rockette HE, Maitz GS, Gur D. A comparison of two data analyses from two observer performance studies using Jackknife ROC and JAFROC. Medical Physics. 32: 1031-4. PMID 15895587 DOI: 10.1118/1.1884766 |
0.359 |
|
| 2004 |
Chakraborty DP, Berbaum KS. Observer studies involving detection and localization: modeling, analysis, and validation. Medical Physics. 31: 2313-30. PMID 15377098 DOI: 10.1118/1.1769352 |
0.427 |
|
| 2003 |
Arenson RL, Chakraborty DP, Seshadri SB, Kundel HL. The digital imaging workstation. 1990. Journal of Digital Imaging. 16: 142-62; discussion 1. PMID 12945823 DOI: 10.1007/S10278-002-6004-Y |
0.385 |
|
| 2003 |
Chakraborty DP. Proposed solution to the FROC problem and an invitation to collaborate Proceedings of Spie - the International Society For Optical Engineering. 5034: 204-212. DOI: 10.1117/12.480068 |
0.322 |
|
| 2002 |
Chakraborty D. Statistical power in observer-performance studies: Comparison of the receiver operating characteristic and free-response methods in tasks involving localization Academic Radiology. 9: 147-156. PMID 11918367 DOI: 10.1016/S1076-6332(03)80164-2 |
0.383 |
|
| 2002 |
Saha PK, Udupa JK, Conant EF, Chakraborty DP, Sullivan D. Breast tissue density quantification via digitized mammograms. Ieee Transactions On Medical Imaging. 20: 792-803. PMID 11513030 DOI: 10.1109/42.938247 |
0.335 |
|
| 2002 |
Chakraborty DP. Comparison of free-response and ROC analyses in modality comparison studies involving lesion localization Proceedings of Spie - the International Society For Optical Engineering. 4686: 210-218. DOI: 10.1117/12.462680 |
0.331 |
|
| 2000 |
Hustinx R, Dolin RJ, Bénard F, Bhatnagar A, Chakraborty D, Smith RJ, Jang S, Alavi A. Impact of attenuation correction on the accuracy of FDG-PET in patients with abdominal tumors: a free-response ROC analysis. European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging. 27: 1365-1371. PMID 11007519 DOI: 10.1007/S002590000287 |
0.438 |
|
| 1999 |
Chakraborty DP. Effect of the antiscatter grid on full-field digital mammography phantom images Journal of Digital Imaging. 12: 12-22. PMID 10036663 DOI: 10.1007/Bf03168622 |
0.402 |
|
| 1997 |
Chakraborty DP. Computer analysis of mammography phantom images (CAMPI): An application to the measurement of microcalcification image quality of directly acquired digital images Medical Physics. 24: 1269-1277. PMID 9284251 DOI: 10.1118/1.598149 |
0.422 |
|
| 1997 |
Chakraborty DP. Computer analysis of mammography phantom images (CAMPI) Proceedings of Spie - the International Society For Optical Engineering. 3032: 292-299. DOI: 10.1117/12.273996 |
0.315 |
|
| 1997 |
Chakraborty DP. Comparison of computer analysis of mammography phantom images (CAMPI) with perceived image quality of phantom targets in the ACR phantom Proceedings of Spie - the International Society For Optical Engineering. 3036: 160-167. DOI: 10.1117/12.271288 |
0.326 |
|
| 1995 |
Chakraborty DP, Eckert MP. Quantitative versus subjective evaluation of mammography accreditation phantom images. Medical Physics. 22: 133-143. PMID 7565344 DOI: 10.1118/1.597463 |
0.4 |
|
| 1991 |
Stafford PM, Chakraborty DP, Martin E, Wong J, Hanks GE. A characterization of two commercially available real-time portal imaging systems International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics. 21: 124-125. DOI: 10.1016/0360-3016(91)90451-9 |
0.334 |
|
| 1990 |
Arenson RL, Chakraborty DP, Seshadri SB, Kundel HL. The digital imaging workstation. Radiology. 176: 303-315. PMID 2367643 DOI: 10.1148/Radiology.176.2.2367643 |
0.383 |
|
| 1990 |
Chakraborty DP, Winter LH. Free-response methodology: alternate analysis and a new observer-performance experiment. Radiology. 174: 873-881. PMID 2305073 DOI: 10.1148/Radiology.174.3.2305073 |
0.409 |
|
| 1989 |
Chakraborty DP, Barnes GT. An energy sensitive cassette for dual-energy mammography. Medical Physics. 16: 7-13. PMID 2921983 DOI: 10.1118/1.596406 |
0.36 |
|
| 1989 |
Chakraborty DP. Maximum likelihood analysis of free‐response receiver operating characteristic (FROC) data Medical Physics. 16: 561-568. PMID 2770630 DOI: 10.1118/1.596358 |
0.424 |
|
| 1987 |
Chakraborty DP. Image intensifier distortion correction Medical Physics. 14: 249-252. PMID 3587148 DOI: 10.1118/1.596078 |
0.412 |
|
| 1986 |
Chakraborty DP, Breatnach ES, Yester MV, Soto B, Barnes GT, Fraser RG. Digital and conventional chest imaging: a modified ROC study of observer performance using simulated nodules. Radiology. 158: 35-39. PMID 3940394 DOI: 10.1148/Radiology.158.1.3940394 |
0.429 |
|
| 1986 |
Niklason LT, Hickey NM, Chakraborty DP, Sabbagh EA, Yester MV, Fraser RG, Barnes GT. Simulated pulmonary nodules: detection with dual-energy digital versus conventional radiography. Radiology. 160: 589-593. PMID 3526398 DOI: 10.1148/Radiology.160.3.3526398 |
0.313 |
|
| 1984 |
Chakraborty DP, Yester MV, Barnes GT, Lakshminarayanan AV. Self-masking subtraction tomosynthesis. Radiology. 150: 225-229. PMID 6359264 DOI: 10.1148/Radiology.150.1.6359264 |
0.317 |
|
| Show low-probability matches. |
