cached image

Mark A. Georgeson - Publications

Aston University, Birmingham, England, United Kingdom 
Psychophysics, Spatial Vision, Motion, Binocular Vision

70 high-probability publications. We are testing a new system for linking publications to authors. You can help! If you notice any inaccuracies, please sign in and mark papers as correct or incorrect matches. If you identify any major omissions or other inaccuracies in the publication list, please let us know.

Year Citation  Score
2018 Baker DH, Lygo FA, Meese TS, Georgeson MA. Binocular summation revisited: Beyond √2. Psychological Bulletin. PMID 30102058 DOI: 10.1037/bul0000163  0.773
2018 Kilpeläinen M, Georgeson MA. Luminance gradient at object borders communicates object location to the human oculomotor system. Scientific Reports. 8: 1593. PMID 29371609 DOI: 10.1038/S41598-018-19464-1  0.336
2017 Maehara G, Hess RF, Georgeson MA. Direction discrimination thresholds in binocular, monocular, and dichoptic viewing: Motion opponency and contrast gain control. Journal of Vision. 17: 7. PMID 28114489 DOI: 10.1167/17.1.7  0.454
2016 Georgeson MA, Schofield AJ. Binocular functional architecture for detection of contrast-modulated gratings. Vision Research. PMID 27664349 DOI: 10.1016/J.Visres.2016.09.005  0.56
2016 Georgeson M, Wallis S, Meese T, Baker D. Contrast and Lustre: a model that accounts for eleven different forms of contrast discrimination in binocular vision. Vision Research. PMID 27576193 DOI: 10.1016/J.Visres.2016.08.001  0.769
2014 Zhou J, Georgeson MA, Hess RF. Linear binocular combination of responses to contrast modulation: contrast-weighted summation in first- and second-order vision. Journal of Vision. 14: 24. PMID 25424859 DOI: 10.1167/14.13.24  0.53
2014 Georgeson MA, Wallis SA. Binocular fusion, suppression and diplopia for blurred edges. Ophthalmic & Physiological Optics : the Journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists). 34: 163-85. PMID 24476421 DOI: 10.1111/Opo.12108  0.755
2013 Baker DH, Meese TS, Georgeson MA. Paradoxical psychometric functions ("swan functions") are explained by dilution masking in four stimulus dimensions. I-Perception. 4: 17-35. PMID 23799185 DOI: 10.1068/i0552  0.793
2013 Wallis SA, Baker DH, Meese TS, Georgeson MA. The slope of the psychometric function and non-stationarity of thresholds in spatiotemporal contrast vision. Vision Research. 76: 1-10. PMID 23041562 DOI: 10.1016/J.Visres.2012.09.019  0.756
2012 Wallis SA, Georgeson MA. Mach bands and multiscale models of spatial vision: the role of first, second, and third derivative operators in encoding bars and edges. Journal of Vision. 12: 18. PMID 23262150 DOI: 10.1167/12.13.18  0.755
2012 Baker DH, Wallis SA, Georgeson MA, Meese TS. The effect of interocular phase difference on perceived contrast. Plos One. 7: e34696. PMID 22485185 DOI: 10.1371/Journal.Pone.0034696  0.762
2012 Baker DH, Wallis SA, Georgeson MA, Meese TS. Nonlinearities in the binocular combination of luminance and contrast. Vision Research. 56: 1-9. PMID 22289645 DOI: 10.1016/J.Visres.2012.01.008  0.761
2012 Wallis S, Georgeson M. What is binocular fusion? Multiplicative combination of luminance gradients via the geometric mean F1000research. 12: 47-47. DOI: 10.7490/F1000Research.1090589.1  0.755
2012 Georgeson M, Wallis S. Mach bands and models of spatial vision: the role of 1st, 2nd and 3rd derivative operators in encoding edges and bars Journal of Vision. 12: 319-319. DOI: 10.1167/12.9.319  0.755
2012 Meese TS, Baker DH, Summers RJ, Georgeson MA. Contrast integration and counter suppression: a general scheme for visual hierarchies? Journal of Vision. 12: 33-33. DOI: 10.1167/12.14.33  0.762
2012 Wallis S, Georgeson M. Binocular fusion, suppression and diplopia: effects of disparity, contrast polarity and contrast imbalance Perception. 41: 16-16. DOI: 10.1068/V120215  0.755
2012 Wallis S, Georgeson M. What is Binocular Fusion? I-Perception. 3: 220-220. DOI: 10.1068/Id220  0.755
2011 Schofield AJ, Rock PB, Georgeson MA. Sun and sky: Does human vision assume a mixture of point and diffuse illumination when interpreting shape-from-shading? Vision Research. 51: 2317-30. PMID 21945645 DOI: 10.1016/J.Visres.2011.09.004  0.51
2011 Elliott SL, Georgeson MA, Webster MA. Response normalization and blur adaptation: data and multi-scale model. Journal of Vision. 11. PMID 21307174 DOI: 10.1167/11.2.7  0.318
2011 Georgeson M, Schofield A. Binocular functional architecture for detection of luminance- and contrast-modulated gratings Journal of Vision. 11: 305-305. DOI: 10.1167/11.11.305  0.322
2010 Schofield AJ, Rock PB, Sun P, Jiang X, Georgeson MA. What is second-order vision for? Discriminating illumination versus material changes. Journal of Vision. 10: 2. PMID 20884600 DOI: 10.1167/10.9.2  0.606
2010 Schofield A, Rock P, Sun P, Georgeson M. The role of second-order vision in discriminating shading versus material changes Journal of Vision. 9: 58-58. DOI: 10.1167/9.8.58  0.564
2010 Georgeson M, Wallis S. Seeing light vs dark lines: psychophysical performance is based on separate channels, limited by noise and uncertainty Journal of Vision. 8: 821-821. DOI: 10.1167/8.6.821  0.755
2010 Schofield AJ, Rock PB, Hesse G, Georgeson MA, Yates TA. The role of texture amplitude in shape from shading Journal of Vision. 6: 258-258. DOI: 10.1167/6.6.258  0.321
2010 Georgeson M, Meese T, Baker D. Detecting contrast differences in binocular and dichoptic vision: we use monocular or binocular channels, whichever gives the MAX response Journal of Vision. 10: 350-350. DOI: 10.1167/10.7.350  0.765
2010 May KA, Georgeson MA. Corrigendum to “Blurred edges look faint, and faint edges look sharp: The effect of a gradient threshold in a multi-scale edge coding model” [Vision Res. 47(13) (2007) 1705–1720] Vision Research. 50: 996. DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2010.02.018  0.596
2009 Wallis SA, Georgeson MA. Mach edges: local features predicted by 3rd derivative spatial filtering. Vision Research. 49: 1886-93. PMID 19426750 DOI: 10.1016/J.Visres.2009.04.026  0.755
2009 Georgeson MA, Yates TA, Schofield AJ. Depth propagation and surface construction in 3-D vision. Vision Research. 49: 84-95. PMID 18977239 DOI: 10.1016/J.Visres.2008.09.030  0.515
2008 Georgeson MA, Yates TA, Schofield AJ. Discriminating depth in corrugated stereo surfaces: facilitation by a pedestal is explained by removal of uncertainty. Vision Research. 48: 2321-8. PMID 18682260 DOI: 10.1016/J.Visres.2008.07.009  0.561
2007 Georgeson MA, May KA, Freeman TC, Hesse GS. From filters to features: scale-space analysis of edge and blur coding in human vision. Journal of Vision. 7: 7.1-21. PMID 17997635 DOI: 10.1167/7.13.7  0.627
2007 Baker DH, Meese TS, Georgeson MA. Binocular interaction: contrast matching and contrast discrimination are predicted by the same model. Spatial Vision. 20: 397-413. PMID 17716525 DOI: 10.1163/156856807781503622  0.797
2007 May KA, Georgeson MA. Added luminance ramp alters perceived edge blur and contrast: a critical test for derivative-based models of edge coding. Vision Research. 47: 1721-31. PMID 17467769 DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2007.02.018  0.596
2007 May KA, Georgeson MA. Blurred edges look faint, and faint edges look sharp: the effect of a gradient threshold in a multi-scale edge coding model. Vision Research. 47: 1705-20. PMID 17442367 DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2007.02.012  0.596
2006 Meese TS, Georgeson MA, Baker DH. Binocular contrast vision at and above threshold. Journal of Vision. 6: 1224-43. PMID 17209731 DOI: 10.1167/6.11.7  0.797
2006 Schofield AJ, Hesse G, Rock PB, Georgeson MA. Local luminance amplitude modulates the interpretation of shape-from-shading in textured surfaces. Vision Research. 46: 3462-82. PMID 16650882 DOI: 10.1016/J.Visres.2006.03.014  0.527
2006 Georgeson MA, Meese TS. Fixed or variable noise in contrast discrimination? The jury's still out... Vision Research. 46: 4294-303. PMID 16225900 DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2005.08.024  0.718
2005 Georgeson MA, Meese TS, Baker DH. Binocular summation, dichoptic masking and contrast gain control Journal of Vision. 5: 797-797. DOI: 10.1167/5.8.797  0.765
2005 Meese TS, Georgeson MA, Baker DH. Interocular masking and summation indicate two stages of divisive contrast gain control Perception. 34: 0-0. DOI: 10.1068/V050255  0.765
2005 Schofield AJ, Hesse G, Georgeson MA, Rock PB. The role of texture in shape from shading: are humans biased towards seeing relief textures? Perception. 34: 0-0. DOI: 10.1068/V050142  0.334
2004 Barbieri-Hesse GS, Schofield AJ, Georgeson MA. The interaction of luminance and texture amplitude in surface depth perception Perception. 33: 0-0. DOI: 10.1068/V040078  0.326
2003 Hammett ST, Georgeson MA, Barbieri-Hesse GS. Motion, flash, and flicker: a unified spatiotemporal model of perceived edge sharpening. Perception. 32: 1221-32. PMID 14700257 DOI: 10.1068/p3400  0.334
2003 Hammett ST, Georgeson MA, Bedingham S, Barbieri-Hesse GS. Motion sharpening and contrast: gain control precedes compressive non-linearity? Vision Research. 43: 1187-99. PMID 12705958 DOI: 10.1016/S0042-6989(03)00071-3  0.331
2003 Schofield AJ, Georgeson MA. Sensitivity to contrast modulation: the spatial frequency dependence of second-order vision. Vision Research. 43: 243-59. PMID 12535984 DOI: 10.1016/S0042-6989(02)00542-4  0.513
2003 Georgeson MA, May KA, Barbieri-Hesse GS. Perceiving edge blur: The Gaussian-derivative template model Journal of Vision. 3: 360a. DOI: 10.1167/3.9.360  0.596
2002 Georgeson MA, Schofield AJ. Shading and texture: separate information channels with a common adaptation mechanism? Spatial Vision. 16: 59-76. PMID 12636225 DOI: 10.1163/15685680260433913  0.523
2002 Georgeson MA, Hammett ST. Seeing blur: 'motion sharpening' without motion. Proceedings. Biological Sciences / the Royal Society. 269: 1429-34. PMID 12137571 DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2002.2029  0.316
2000 Schofield AJ, Georgeson MA. The temporal properties of first- and second-order vision. Vision Research. 40: 2475-87. PMID 10915887 DOI: 10.1016/S0042-6989(00)00111-5  0.535
2000 Georgeson MA, Scott-Samuel NE. Spatial resolution and receptive field height of motion sensors in human vision. Vision Research. 40: 745-58. PMID 10683453 DOI: 10.1016/S0042-6989(99)00219-9  0.623
1999 Georgeson MA, Scott-Samuel NE. Motion contrast: a new metric for direction discrimination. Vision Research. 39: 4393-402. PMID 10789432 DOI: 10.1016/S0042-6989(99)00147-9  0.623
1999 Georgeson MA, Meese TS. Adaptive filtering in spatial vision: evidence from feature marking in plaids. Perception. 28: 687-702. PMID 10664764 DOI: 10.1068/P2836  0.718
1999 Scott-Samuel NE, Georgeson MA. Feature matching and segmentation in motion perception. Proceedings. Biological Sciences / the Royal Society. 266: 2289-94. PMID 10629979 DOI: 10.1098/rspb.1999.0921  0.623
1999 Schofield AJ, Georgeson MA. Sensitivity to modulations of luminance and contrast in visual white noise: separate mechanisms with similar behaviour. Vision Research. 39: 2697-716. PMID 10492831 DOI: 10.1016/S0042-6989(98)00284-3  0.548
1999 Scott-Samuel NE, Georgeson MA. Does early non-linearity account for second-order motion? Vision Research. 39: 2853-65. PMID 10492815 DOI: 10.1016/S0042-6989(98)00316-2  0.623
1998 Hammett ST, Georgeson MA, Gorea A. Motion blur and motion sharpening: temporal smear and local contrast non-linearity. Vision Research. 38: 2099-108. PMID 9797970 DOI: 10.1016/S0042-6989(97)00430-6  0.599
1997 Georgeson MA, Meese TS. Perception of stationary plaids: the role of spatial filters in edge analysis. Vision Research. 37: 3255-71. PMID 9425542 DOI: 10.1016/S0042-6989(97)00124-7  0.718
1997 Scott-Samuel NE, Georgeson MA. Breaking up is never easy: Feature matching in motion perception Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 38: S379.  0.59
1997 Hammett ST, Georgeson MA, Gorea A. Motion sharpening and BLUR Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 38: S377.  0.511
1996 Georgeson MA, Freeman TC, Scott-Samuel NE. Sub-pixel accuracy: psychophysical validation of an algorithm for fine positioning and movement of dots on visual displays. Vision Research. 36: 605-12. PMID 8855004 DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(96)89253-4  0.645
1996 Meese TS, Georgeson MA. Spatial filter combination in human pattern vision: channel interactions revealed by adaptation. Perception. 25: 255-77. PMID 8804088 DOI: 10.1068/P250255  0.718
1996 Meese TS, Georgeson MA. The tilt aftereffect in plaids and gratings: channel codes, local signs and "patchwise" transforms. Vision Research. 36: 1421-37. PMID 8762761 DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(95)00212-X  0.718
1996 Georgeson MA, Meese TS. Perceived structure of plaids implies variable combination of oriented filters in edge finding Proceedings of Spie - the International Society For Optical Engineering. 2657: 175-189. DOI: 10.1117/12.238714  0.718
1992 Greenlee MW, Georgeson MA, Magnussen S, Harris JP. The decay of adaptation to spatial contrast: a response to david rose Vision Research. 32: 1785-1788. DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(92)90172-F  0.302
1991 Greenlee MW, Georgeson MA, Magnussen S, Harris JP. The time course of adaptation to spatial contrast. Vision Research. 31: 223-36. PMID 2017883 DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(91)90113-J  0.341
1988 Swanson WH, Georgeson MA, Wilson HR. Comparison of contrast responses across spatial mechanisms. Vision Research. 28: 457-9. PMID 3188408 DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(88)90187-3  0.318
1985 Georgeson MA, Turner RS. Afterimages of sinusoidal, square-wave and compound gratings. Vision Research. 25: 1709-20. PMID 3832595 DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(85)90143-9  0.334
1984 Georgeson MA, Turner RS. Stability of phase recognition in complex spatial waveforms. Vision Research. 24: 851-8. PMID 6474840 DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(84)90157-3  0.322
1973 Georgeson MA, Blakemore C. Apparent Depth and the Müller—Lyer Illusion Perception. 2: 225-234. DOI: 10.1068/p020225  0.509
1973 Georgeson MA, Blakemore C. Apparent depth and the Muller Lyer illusion Perception. 2: 225-234.  0.445
1971 Blakemore C, Carpenter RHS, Georgeson MA. Lateral thinking about lateral inhibition [16] Nature. 234: 418-419. DOI: 10.1038/234418b0  0.492
1970 Blakemore C, Carpenter RH, Georgeson MA. Lateral inhibition between orientation detectors in the human visual system. Nature. 228: 37-9. PMID 5456209 DOI: 10.1038/228037a0  0.528
Show low-probability matches.