Roman Feiman - Publications
Affiliations: | Department of Psychology | University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA |
Year | Citation | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2023 | Gomes V, Doherty R, Smits D, Goldin-Meadow S, Trueswell JC, Feiman R. It's not just what we don't know: The mapping problem in the acquisition of negation. Cognitive Psychology. 145: 101592. PMID 37567048 DOI: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2023.101592 | 0.527 | |||
2022 | Feiman R, Mody S, Carey S. The development of reasoning by exclusion in infancy. Cognitive Psychology. 135: 101473. PMID 35358901 DOI: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2022.101473 | 0.472 | |||
2021 | Schneider RM, Brockbank E, Feiman R, Barner D. Counting and the ontogenetic origins of exact equality. Cognition. 218: 104952. PMID 34801862 DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104952 | 0.603 | |||
2020 | Skordos D, Feiman R, Bale A, Barner D. Do Children Interpret ‘or’ Conjunctively? Journal of Semantics. 37: 247-267. DOI: 10.1093/Jos/Ffz022 | 0.604 | |||
2019 | Feiman R, Hartshorne JK, Barner D. Contrast and entailment: Abstract logical relations constrain how 2- and 3-year-old children interpret unknown numbers. Cognition. 183: 192-207. PMID 30496910 DOI: 10.1016/J.Cognition.2018.11.005 | 0.763 | |||
2017 | Reuter T, Feiman R, Snedeker J. Getting to No: Pragmatic and Semantic Factors in Two- and Three-Year-Olds' Understanding of Negation. Child Development. PMID 28617962 DOI: 10.1111/Cdev.12858 | 0.621 | |||
2017 | Feiman R, Mody S, Sanborn S, Carey S. What Do You Mean, No? Toddlers’ Comprehension of Logical “No” and “Not” Language Learning and Development. 13: 430-450. DOI: 10.1080/15475441.2017.1317253 | 0.641 | |||
2016 | Feiman R, Snedeker J. The logic in language: How all quantifiers are alike, but each quantifier is different. Cognitive Psychology. 87: 29-52. PMID 27214380 DOI: 10.1016/J.Cogpsych.2016.04.002 | 0.627 | |||
2015 | Feiman R, Carey S, Cushman F. Infants' representations of others' goals: representing approach over avoidance. Cognition. 136: 204-14. PMID 25498746 DOI: 10.1016/J.Cognition.2014.10.007 | 0.446 | |||
Show low-probability matches. |