Emma Wu Dowd
Affiliations: | Ohio State University, Columbus, Columbus, OH |
Website:
https://u.osu.edu/dowd.45/Google:
"Emma Wu Dowd"Mean distance: 15.1 (cluster 15) | S | N | B | C | P |
Parents
Sign in to add mentor| Tobias Egner | grad student | Duke | |
| Stephen R. Mitroff | grad student | Duke | |
| Julie D. Golomb | post-doc | 2016- | Ohio State |
BETA: Related publications
See more...
Publications
|
You can help our author matching system! If you notice any publications incorrectly attributed to this author, please sign in and mark matches as correct or incorrect. |
| Jones CM, Dowd EW, Golomb JD. (2021) Shifting expectations: Lapses in spatial attention are driven by anticipatory attentional shifts. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics |
| Dowd EW, Nag S, Golomb JD. (2019) Working memory-driven attention towards a distractor does not interfere with target feature perception. Visual Cognition. 27: 714-731 |
| Dowd EW, Golomb JD. (2019) The Binding Problem after an eye movement. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics |
| Dowd EW, Golomb JD. (2019) Object-Feature Binding Survives Dynamic Shifts of Spatial Attention. Psychological Science. 956797618818481 |
| Chen J, Dowd EW, Starks MD, et al. (2019) Neural reconstructions of attended object features using fMRI and EEG Journal of Vision. 19: 269c |
| Jones CM, Dowd EW, Golomb JD. (2019) A Matter of Expectations: Lapses in Spatial Attention May Be Driven by Anticipatory Attentional Shifts Journal of Vision. 19: 102b |
| Dowd EW, Nag S, Golomb JD. (2019) Working memory-driven attention towards a distractor does not interfere with target feature perception Visual Cognition. 27: 714-731 |
| Kiyonaga A, Dowd EW, Egner T. (2017) Neural Representation of Working Memory Content Is Modulated by Visual Attentional Demand. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 1-14 |
| Dowd EW, Pearson JM, Egner T. (2017) Decoding working memory content from attentional biases. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review |
| Dowd E, Nag S, Golomb J. (2017) Attentional capture by working memory does not interfere with visual feature perception Journal of Vision. 17: 956 |