Joshua Klayman
Affiliations: | University of Chicago, Chicago, IL |
Area:
Marketing Business Administration, Management Business Administration, Social PsychologyGoogle:
"Joshua Klayman"Mean distance: 53433
BETA: Related publications
See more...
Publications
You can help our author matching system! If you notice any publications incorrectly attributed to this author, please sign in and mark matches as correct or incorrect. |
Gnepp J, Klayman J, Williamson IO, et al. (2020) The future of feedback: Motivating performance improvement through future-focused feedback. Plos One. 15: e0234444 |
Tsai CI, Klayman J, Hastie R. (2008) Effects of amount of information on judgment accuracy and confidence Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 107: 97-105 |
Burson KA, Larrick RP, Klayman J. (2006) Skilled or unskilled, but still unaware of it: how perceptions of difficulty drive miscalibration in relative comparisons. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 90: 60-77 |
Soll JB, Klayman J. (2004) Overconfidence in interval estimates. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 30: 299-314 |
Klayman J, Soll JB, González-Vallejo C, et al. (1999) Overconfidence: It Depends on How, What, and Whom You Ask Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 79: 216-247 |
Klayman J. (1995) Varieties of Confirmation Bias Psychology of Learning and Motivation. 32: 385-418 |
Klayman J, Brown K. (1994) Debias the environment instead of the judge: an alternative approach to reducing error in diagnostic (and other) judgment. Cognition. 49: 97-122 |
Slowiaczek LM, Klayman J, Sherman SJ, et al. (1992) Information selection and use in hypothesis testing: what is a good question, and what is a good answer? Memory & Cognition. 20: 392-405 |
Gnepp J, Klayman J. (1992) Recognition of uncertainty in emotional inferences: Reasoning about emotionally equivocal situations. Developmental Psychology. 28: 145-158 |
Klayman J, Ha Y. (1987) Confirmation, disconfirmation, and information in hypothesis testing. Psychological Review. 94: 211-228 |