Sekar Raju, Ph.D.
Affiliations: | 2002 | Ohio State University, Columbus, Columbus, OH |
Area:
Marketing Business AdministrationGoogle:
"Sekar Raju"Mean distance: (not calculated yet)
Parents
Sign in to add mentorH Rao Unnava | grad student | 2002 | Ohio State | |
(Why do consumers committed to a brand counterargue negative information? Understanding the mediating role of arousal.) |
BETA: Related publications
See more...
Publications
You can help our author matching system! If you notice any publications incorrectly attributed to this author, please sign in and mark matches as correct or incorrect. |
Raju S, Rajagopal P, Murdock MR. (2021) The moderating effects of prior trust on consumer responses to firm failures Journal of Business Research. 122: 24-37 |
Jayashankar P, Raju S. (2020) The effect of social cohesion and social networks on perceptions of food availability among low-income consumers Journal of Business Research. 108: 316-323 |
Montgomery NV, Raju S, Desai KK, et al. (2018) When Good Consumers Turn Bad: Psychological Contract Breach in Committed Brand Relationships Journal of Consumer Psychology. 28: 437-449 |
Raju S. (2017) Positive and negative effects of affective and continuance brand commitment in a service context Journal of Indian Business Research. 9: 133-148 |
Ramaswami SN, Raju S, Page DC. (2016) Conceptualizing and measuring resistance to change in brand relationships Journal of Indian Business Research. 8: 180-204 |
Raju S, Unnava HR, Montgomery NV. (2009) The moderating effect of brand commitment on the evaluation of competitive brands Journal of Advertising. 38: 21-35 |
Raju S, Unnava HR, Montgomery NV. (2009) The effect of brand commitment on the evaluation of nonpreferred brands: A disconfirmation process Journal of Consumer Research. 35: 851-863 |
Desai KK, Raju S. (2007) Adverse influence of brand commitment on consideration of and preference for competing brands Psychology & Marketing. 24: 595-614 |
Raju S, Unnava HR. (2006) The Role of Arousal in Commitment: An Explanation for the Number of Counterarguments Journal of Consumer Research. 33: 173-178 |