Sumit Prakash, Ph.D.
Affiliations: | 2007 | Biochemistry and Molecular Biology | Northwestern University, Evanston, IL |
| 2016 | Chemistry and Chemical Biology | University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA |
Area:
Cancer SignalingGoogle:
"Sumit Prakash"Mean distance: (not calculated yet)
Parents
Sign in to add mentor| Andreas T. Matouschek | grad student | 2006 | (Chemistry Tree) |
| Jack Taunton | post-doc | 2016 | (Chemistry Tree) |
BETA: Related publications
See more...
Publications
|
You can help our author matching system! If you notice any publications incorrectly attributed to this author, please sign in and mark matches as correct or incorrect. |
| Bashore C, Prakash S, Johnson MC, et al. (2022) Targeted degradation via direct 26S proteasome recruitment. Nature Chemical Biology. 19: 55-63 |
| Cockram PE, Kist M, Prakash S, et al. (2021) Ubiquitination in the regulation of inflammatory cell death and cancer. Cell Death and Differentiation. 28: 591-605 |
| Wertz I, Kategaya L, Lello PD, et al. (2018) Abstract SY23-03: Development and mechanistic characterization of USP7 deubiquitinase inhibitors Cancer Research. 78 |
| Kategaya L, Di Lello P, Rougé L, et al. (2017) USP7 small-molecule inhibitors interfere with ubiquitin binding. Nature |
| Okrut J, Prakash S, Wu Q, et al. (2015) Allosteric N-WASP activation by an inter-SH3 domain linker in Nck. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America |
| Fishbain S, Prakash S, Herrig A, et al. (2011) Rad23 escapes degradation because it lacks a proteasome initiation region. Nature Communications. 2: 192 |
| Inobe T, Fishbain S, Prakash S, et al. (2011) Defining the geometry of the two-component proteasome degron. Nature Chemical Biology. 7: 161-7 |
| Inobe T, Prakash S, Fishbain S, et al. (2010) 1P034 1YA0915 Defining the geometry of the two-component proteasome degron(Protein:Structure & Function,Early Research in Biophysics Award Candidate Presentations,Early Research in Biophysics Award,The 48th Annual Meeting of the Biophysical Society of Japan) Seibutsu Butsuri. 50: S24-S25 |
| Koodathingal P, Jaffe NE, Kraut DA, et al. (2009) ATP-dependent proteases differ substantially in their ability to unfold globular proteins. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 284: 18674-84 |
| Prakash S, Inobe T, Hatch AJ, et al. (2009) Substrate selection by the proteasome during degradation of protein complexes. Nature Chemical Biology. 5: 29-36 |