Keiji Ota
Affiliations: | New York University, New York, NY, United States |
Area:
Decision-making, motor learning, probability inferenceGoogle:
"Keiji Ota"Mean distance: (not calculated yet)
BETA: Related publications
See more...
Publications
You can help our author matching system! If you notice any publications incorrectly attributed to this author, please sign in and mark matches as correct or incorrect. |
Ota K, Maloney LT. (2024) Dissecting Bayes: Using influence measures to test normative use of probability density information derived from a sample. Plos Computational Biology. 20: e1011999 |
Dal Martello MF, Ota K, Pietralla DE, et al. (2023) Detecting visual texture patterns in binary sequences through pattern features. Journal of Vision. 23: 1 |
Tanae M, Ota K, Takiyama K. (2021) Competition Rather Than Observation and Cooperation Facilitates Optimal Motor Planning. Frontiers in Sports and Active Living. 3: 637225 |
Ota K, Tanae M, Ishii K, et al. (2020) Optimizing motor decision-making through competition with opponents. Scientific Reports. 10: 950 |
Ota K, Shinya M, Maloney LT, et al. (2019) Sub-optimality in motor planning is not improved by explicit observation of motor uncertainty. Scientific Reports. 9: 14850 |
Ota K, Shinya M, Kudo K. (2019) Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Over Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex Modulates Risk-Attitude in Motor Decision-Making. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 13: 297 |
Onagawa R, Shinya M, Ota K, et al. (2019) Risk aversion in the adjustment of speed-accuracy tradeoff depending on time constraints. Scientific Reports. 9: 11732 |
Ota K, Shinya M, & Kudo, et al. (2019) Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Over Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex Modulates Risk-Attitude in Motor Decision-Making Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 3: 1-11 |
Ota K, Phillips J, Maloney LT. (2019) Testing accuracy, additivity, and sufficiency of human use of probability density information in a visuo-cognitive task Journal of Vision. 19: 276 |
Ota K, Shinya M, Kudo K. (2016) Sub-optimality in motor planning is retained throughout 9 days practice of 2250 trials. Scientific Reports. 6: 37181 |