Year |
Citation |
Score |
2022 |
Uddén J, Hultén A, Schoffelen JM, Lam N, Harbusch K, van den Bosch A, Kempen G, Petersson KM, Hagoort P. Supramodal Sentence Processing in the Human Brain: fMRI Evidence for the Influence of Syntactic Complexity in More Than 200 Participants. Neurobiology of Language (Cambridge, Mass.). 3: 575-598. PMID 37215341 DOI: 10.1162/nol_a_00076 |
0.614 |
|
2019 |
Kempen G, Harbusch K. Mutual attraction between high-frequency verbs and clause types with finite verbs in early positions: corpus evidence from spoken English, Dutch, and German Language, Cognition and Neuroscience. 34: 1140-1151. DOI: 10.1080/23273798.2019.1642498 |
0.305 |
|
2018 |
Kempen G, Harbusch K. A competitive mechanism selecting verb-second versus verb-final word order in causative and argumentative clauses of spoken Dutch: A corpus-linguistic study Language Sciences. 69: 30-42. DOI: 10.1016/J.Langsci.2018.05.005 |
0.404 |
|
2017 |
Kuiper K, Bimesl N, Kempen G, Ogino M. Initial vs. non-initial placement of agent constructions in spoken clauses: A corpus-based study of language production under time pressure Language Sciences. 64: 16-33. DOI: 10.1016/J.Langsci.2017.06.001 |
0.52 |
|
2015 |
Velde Mvd, Kempen G, Harbusch K. Dative alternation and planning scope in spoken language: A corpus study on effects of verb bias in VO and OV clauses of Dutch Lingua. 165: 92-108. DOI: 10.1016/J.Lingua.2015.07.006 |
0.447 |
|
2014 |
Kempen G. Prolegomena to a Neurocomputational Architecture for Human Grammatical Encoding and Decoding Neuroinformatics. 12: 111-142. PMID 23872869 DOI: 10.1007/S12021-013-9191-4 |
0.527 |
|
2013 |
Segaert K, Kempen G, Petersson KM, Hagoort P. Syntactic priming and the lexical boost effect during sentence production and sentence comprehension: an fMRI study. Brain and Language. 124: 174-83. PMID 23376214 DOI: 10.1016/J.Bandl.2012.12.003 |
0.664 |
|
2012 |
Kempen G, Olsthoorn N, Sprenger S. Grammatical workspace sharing during language production and language comprehension: Evidence from grammatical multitasking Language and Cognitive Processes. 27: 345-380. DOI: 10.1080/01690965.2010.544583 |
0.704 |
|
2009 |
Vosse T, Kempen G. The Unification Space implemented as a localist neural net: Predictions and error-tolerance in a constraint-based parser Cognitive Neurodynamics. 3: 331-346. PMID 19784798 DOI: 10.1007/S11571-009-9094-0 |
0.756 |
|
2009 |
Snijders TM, Vosse T, Kempen G, Van Berkum JJ, Petersson KM, Hagoort P. Retrieval and unification of syntactic structure in sentence comprehension: an FMRI study using word-category ambiguity. Cerebral Cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991). 19: 1493-503. PMID 19001084 DOI: 10.1093/Cercor/Bhn187 |
0.705 |
|
2009 |
Vosse T, Kempen G. In defense of competition during syntactic ambiguity resolution Journal of Psycholinguistic Research. 38: 1-9. PMID 18521754 DOI: 10.1007/S10936-008-9075-1 |
0.715 |
|
2009 |
Kempen G. Clausal coordination and coordinative ellipsis in a model of the speaker Linguistics. 47: 653-696. DOI: 10.1515/Ling.2009.022 |
0.41 |
|
2007 |
Kuiper K, Egmond MV, Kempen G, Sprenger SA. Slipping on superlemmas: Multiword lexical items in speech production The Mental Lexicon. 2: 313-357. DOI: 10.1075/Ml.2.3.03Kui |
0.449 |
|
2006 |
Sprenger SA, Levelt WJM, Kempen G. Lexical access during the production of idiomatic phrases Journal of Memory and Language. 54: 161-184. DOI: 10.1016/J.Jml.2005.11.001 |
0.686 |
|
2003 |
Kempen G, Harbusch K. An artificial opposition between grammaticality and frequency: comment on Bornkessel, Schlesewsky, and Friederici (2002). Cognition. 90: 205-210. PMID 14599755 DOI: 10.1016/S0010-0277(03)00145-8 |
0.336 |
|
2000 |
Vosse T, Kempen G. Syntactic structure assembly in human parsing: a computational model based on competitive inhibition and a lexicalist grammar. Cognition. 75: 105-143. PMID 10771275 DOI: 10.1016/S0010-0277(00)00063-9 |
0.769 |
|
2000 |
Kempen G. Could grammatical encoding and grammatical decoding be subserved by the same processing module Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 23: 38-39. DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X00402396 |
0.489 |
|
1998 |
Kempen G. Comparing and explaining the trajectories of first and second language acquisition: in search of the right mix of psychological and linguistic factors Bilingualism: Language and Cognition. 1: 29-30. DOI: 10.1017/S1366728998000066 |
0.359 |
|
1989 |
Kempen G, Vosse T. Incremental syntactic tree formation in human sentence processing: A cognitive architecture based on activation decay and simulated annealing Connection Science. 1: 273-290. DOI: 10.1080/09540098908915642 |
0.743 |
|
1987 |
Kempen G, Hoenkamp E. An Incremental Procedural Grammar for Sentence Formulation Cognitive Science. 11: 201-258. DOI: 10.1207/S15516709Cog1102_5 |
0.548 |
|
1987 |
van Wijk C, Kempen G. A dual system for producing self-repairs in spontaneous speech: Evidence from experimentally elicited corrections Cognitive Psychology. 19: 403-440. DOI: 10.1016/0010-0285(87)90014-4 |
0.64 |
|
1987 |
Pijls F, Daelemans W, Kempen G. Artificial intelligence tools for grammar and spelling instruction Instructional Science. 16: 319-336. DOI: 10.1007/Bf00117750 |
0.617 |
|
1983 |
Kempen G, Huijbers P. The lexicalization process in sentence production and naming: indirect election of words Cognition. 14: 185-209. DOI: 10.1016/0010-0277(83)90029-X |
0.472 |
|
1980 |
Wijk Cv, Kempen G. Funktiewoorden - een Inventarisatie voor het Nederlands - An Inventory of Dutch Function Words Itl – International Journal of Applied Linguistics. 47: 53-68. DOI: 10.1075/Itl.47.05Van |
0.533 |
|
1976 |
Kempen G. Syntactic constructions as retrieval plans British Journal of Psychology. 67: 149-160. DOI: 10.1111/J.2044-8295.1976.Tb01505.X |
0.487 |
|
1969 |
Kempen G, Hermans B, Klinkum A, Brand M, Verhaaren F. The word-frequency effect and incongruity perception: Methodological artifacts? Attention Perception & Psychophysics. 5: 161-162. DOI: 10.3758/Bf03209549 |
0.386 |
|
Show low-probability matches. |