Jason A Chen, Ph.D. - Publications
Affiliations: | 2006-2010 | Division of Educational Studies | Emory University, Atlanta, GA |
2010-2012 | Franciscan Hospital for Children, Harvard Graduate School of Education, MGH Institute of Health Professions | ||
2012- | School of Education | College of William and Mary, Williamsburg, VA |
Area:
Educational Psychology, Education, Science Education, Educational TechnologyYear | Citation | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2016 | Chen JA, Tutwiler MS, Metcalf SJ, Kamarainen AM, Grotzer TA, Dede CJ. A multi-user virtual environment to support students’ self-efficacy and interest in science: A latent growth model analysis Learning and Instruction. 41: 11-22. DOI: 10.1016/J.Learninstruc.2015.09.007 | 0.313 | |||
2015 | Andersen L, Chen JA. Do high-ability students disidentifiy with science? A descriptive study of U.S. ninth graders in 2009 Science Education. 100: 57-77. DOI: 10.1002/Sce.21197 | 0.305 | |||
2014 | Star JR, Chen JA, Taylor MW, Dede C, Durkin K, Chao T. Evaluating technology-based strategies for enhancing motivation in mathematics International Journal of Stem Education. 1: 1-7. DOI: 10.1186/2196-7822-1-7 | 0.329 | |||
2014 | Chen JA, Metcalf SJ, Tutwiler MS. Motivation and beliefs about the nature of scientific knowledge within an immersive virtual ecosystems environment Contemporary Educational Psychology. 39: 112-123. DOI: 10.1016/J.Cedpsych.2014.02.004 | 0.328 | |||
2013 | Chen JA, Usher EL. Profiles of the sources of science self-efficacy Learning and Individual Differences. 24: 11-21. DOI: 10.1016/J.Lindif.2012.11.002 | 0.316 | |||
2012 | Chen JA. Implicit theories, epistemic beliefs, and science motivation: A person-centered approach Learning and Individual Differences. 22: 724-735. DOI: 10.1016/J.Lindif.2012.07.013 | 0.321 | |||
2010 | Chen JA, Pajares F. Implicit theories of ability of Grade 6 science students: Relation to epistemological beliefs and academic motivation and achievement in science Contemporary Educational Psychology. 35: 75-87. DOI: 10.1016/J.Cedpsych.2009.10.003 | 0.306 | |||
Show low-probability matches. |