Frederick G. Conrad - Publications

Affiliations: 
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Ann Arbor, MI 
Area:
Theory and Methods, Social Psychology, Linguistics Language

66 high-probability publications. We are testing a new system for linking publications to authors. You can help! If you notice any inaccuracies, please sign in and mark papers as correct or incorrect matches. If you identify any major omissions or other inaccuracies in the publication list, please let us know.

Year Citation  Score
2023 Conrad FG, Schober MF, Hupp AL, West BT, Larsen KM, Ong AR, Wang T. Video in Survey Interviews: Effects on Data Quality and Respondent Experience. Methoden, Daten, Analysen. 17: 135-170. PMID 37724168 DOI: 10.12758/mda.2022.13  0.349
2021 West BT, Ong AR, Conrad FG, Schober MF, Larsen KM, Hupp AL. INTERVIEWER EFFECTS IN LIVE VIDEO AND PRERECORDED VIDEO INTERVIEWING. Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology. 10: 317-336. PMID 37406077 DOI: 10.1093/jssam/smab040  0.316
2021 Fail S, Schober MF, Conrad FG. The time it takes to reveal embarrassing information in a mobile phone survey. International Journal of Social Research Methodology. 24: 249-364. PMID 33732090 DOI: 10.1080/13645579.2020.1824629  0.309
2020 Sun H, Conrad FG, Kreuter F. The Relationship between Interviewer-Respondent Rapport and Data Quality Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology. DOI: 10.1093/Jssam/Smz043  0.344
2019 Davis RE, Lee S, Johnson TP, Conrad F, Resnicow K, Thrasher JF, Mesa A, Peterson KE. The Influence of Item Characteristics on Acquiescence among Latino Survey Respondents Field Methods. 32: 3-22. DOI: 10.1177/1525822X19873272  0.396
2019 Zhang C, Antoun C, Yan HY, Conrad FG. Professional Respondents in Opt-in Online Panels: What Do We Really Know?: Social Science Computer Review. 89443931984510. DOI: 10.1177/0894439319845102  0.434
2018 Schober MF, Suessbrick AL, Conrad FG. When Do Misunderstandings Matter? Evidence From Survey Interviews About Smoking. Topics in Cognitive Science. PMID 29630774 DOI: 10.1111/Tops.12330  0.388
2018 Allum N, Conrad FG, Wenz A. Consequences of mid-stream mode-switching in a panel survey Survey Research Methods. 12: 43-58. DOI: 10.18148/Srm/2018.V12I1.6779  0.396
2018 Liu M, Conrad FG. Where Should I Start? On Default Values for Slider Questions in Web Surveys Social Science Computer Review. 37: 248-269. DOI: 10.1177/0894439318755336  0.38
2018 Conrad F, Corey J, Goldstein S, Ostrow J, Sadowsky M. Extreme re-listening: Songs people love . . . and continue to love Psychology of Music. 47: 158-172. DOI: 10.1177/0305735617751050  0.408
2017 Conrad FG, Couper MP, Tourangeau R, Zhang C. Reducing speeding in web surveys by providing immediate feedback. Survey Research Methods. 11: 45-61. PMID 31745400 DOI: 10.18148/Srm/2017.V11I1.6304  0.435
2017 Mittereder F, Durow J, West BT, Kreuter F, Conrad FG. Interviewer–respondent Interactions in Conversational and Standardized Interviewing Field Methods. 30: 3-21. DOI: 10.1177/1525822X17729341  0.423
2017 Conrad FG, Schober MF, Antoun C, Yan HY, Hupp AL, Johnston M, Ehlen P, Vickers L, Zhang C. Respondent mode choice in a smartphone survey Public Opinion Quarterly. 81: 307-337. DOI: 10.1093/Poq/Nfw097  0.311
2017 Antoun C, Couper MP, Conrad FG. Effects of Mobile versus PC Web on Survey Response Quality Public Opinion Quarterly. 81: 280-306. DOI: 10.1093/Poq/Nfw088  0.342
2017 West BT, Conrad FG, Kreuter F, Mittereder F. Nonresponse and Measurement Error Variance among Interviewers in Standardized and Conversational Interviewing Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology. 6: 335-359. DOI: 10.1093/Jssam/Smx029  0.36
2016 Schober MF, Pasek J, Guggenheim L, Lampe C, Conrad FG. Social Media Analyses for Social Measurement. Public Opinion Quarterly. 80: 180-211. PMID 27257310 DOI: 10.1093/Poq/Nfv048  0.312
2016 Burkill S, Copas A, Couper MP, Clifton S, Prah P, Datta J, Conrad F, Wellings K, Johnson AM, Erens B. Using the Web to Collect Data on Sensitive Behaviours: A Study Looking at Mode Effects on the British National Survey of Sexual Attitudes and Lifestyles. Plos One. 11: e0147983. PMID 26866687 DOI: 10.1371/Journal.Pone.0147983  0.413
2016 Conrad FG, Couper MP, Sakshaug JW. Classifying open-ended reports: Factors affecting the reliability of occupation codes Journal of Official Statistics. 32: 75-92. DOI: 10.1515/Jos-2016-0003  0.317
2016 Zhang C, Conrad FG. Intervening to Reduce Satisficing Behaviors in Web Surveys Social Science Computer Review. 36: 57-81. DOI: 10.1177/0894439316683923  0.36
2016 Horwitz R, Kreuter F, Conrad F. Using Mouse Movements to Predict Web Survey Response Difficulty Social Science Computer Review. 35: 388-405. DOI: 10.1177/0894439315626360  0.399
2016 West BT, Conrad FG, Kreuter F, Mittereder F. Can conversational interviewing improve survey response quality without increasing interviewer effects? Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series a (Statistics in Society). 181: 181-203. DOI: 10.1111/Rssa.12255  0.407
2016 Tourangeau R, Sun H, Conrad FG, Couper MP. Examples in Open-Ended Survey Questions International Journal of Public Opinion Research. 29: 690-702. DOI: 10.1093/Ijpor/Edw015  0.388
2016 Liu M, Conrad FG. An experiment testing six formats of 101-point rating scales Computers in Human Behavior. 55: 364-371. DOI: 10.1016/J.Chb.2015.09.036  0.409
2016 Liu M, Conrad FG, Lee S. Comparing acquiescent and extreme response styles in face-to-face and web surveys Quality and Quantity. 1-18. DOI: 10.1007/S11135-016-0320-7  0.385
2015 Conrad FG, Schober MF, Jans M, Orlowski RA, Nielsen D, Levenstein R. Comprehension and engagement in survey interviews with virtual agents. Frontiers in Psychology. 6: 1578. PMID 26539138 DOI: 10.3389/Fpsyg.2015.01578  0.414
2015 Schober MF, Conrad FG, Antoun C, Ehlen P, Fail S, Hupp AL, Johnston M, Vickers L, Yan HY, Zhang C. Precision and Disclosure in Text and Voice Interviews on Smartphones. Plos One. 10: e0128337. PMID 26060991 DOI: 10.1371/Journal.Pone.0128337  0.482
2015 Schober MF, Conrad FG. Improving Social Measurement by Understanding Interaction in Survey Interviews Policy Insights From the Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 2: 211-219. DOI: 10.1177/2372732215601112  0.427
2015 Antoun C, Zhang C, Conrad FG, Schober MF. Comparisons of Online Recruitment Strategies for Convenience Samples Field Methods. 28: 231-246. DOI: 10.1177/1525822X15603149  0.305
2015 Liu M, Lee S, Conrad FG. Comparing extreme response styles between agree-disagree and item-specific scales Public Opinion Quarterly. 79: 952-975. DOI: 10.1093/Poq/Nfv034  0.378
2014 Erens B, Burkill S, Couper MP, Conrad F, Clifton S, Tanton C, Phelps A, Datta J, Mercer CH, Sonnenberg P, Prah P, Mitchell KR, Wellings K, Johnson AM, Copas AJ. Nonprobability Web surveys to measure sexual behaviors and attitudes in the general population: a comparison with a probability sample interview survey. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 16: e276. PMID 25488851 DOI: 10.2196/Jmir.3382  0.369
2014 Freedman VA, Conrad F, Cornman J, Schwarz N, Stafford F. Does Time Fly When You Are Having Fun? A Day Reconstruction Method Analysis. Journal of Happiness Studies. 15: 639-655. PMID 25110460 DOI: 10.1007/S10902-013-9440-0  0.316
2014 Zhang C, Conrad FG. Speeding in web surveys: The tendency to answer very fast and its association with straightlining Survey Research Methods. 8: 127-135. DOI: 10.18148/Srm/2014.V8I2.5453  0.4
2014 Tourangeau R, Conrad FG, Couper MP, Ye C. The effects of providing examples in survey questions Public Opinion Quarterly. 78: 100-125. DOI: 10.1093/Poq/Nft083  0.372
2013 Couper MP, Tourangeau R, Conrad FG, Zhang C. The Design of Grids in Web Surveys. Social Science Computer Review. 31: 322-345. PMID 25258472 DOI: 10.1177/0894439312469865  0.314
2013 Freedman VA, Broome J, Conrad F, Cornman JC. Interviewer and Respondent Interactions and Quality Assessments in a Time Diary Study. Electronic International Journal of Time Use Research. 10: 55-75. PMID 24729796 DOI: 10.13085/eIJTUR.10.1.55-75  0.675
2013 Tourangeau R, Couper MP, Conrad FG. "Up Means Good": The Effect of Screen Position on Evaluative Ratings in Web Surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly. 77: 69-88. PMID 24634546 DOI: 10.1093/Poq/Nfs063  0.339
2013 Freedman VA, Stafford F, Schwarz N, Conrad F. Measuring Time Use of Older Couples: Lessons from the Panel Study of Income Dynamics. Field Methods. 25. PMID 24319346 DOI: 10.1177/1525822X12467142  0.332
2013 Erens B, Burkill S, Copas A, Couper M, Conrad F, Tanton C. P3.343 How Well Do Web Panel Surveys Measure Sensitive Behaviours in the General Population, and Can They Be Improved? A Comparison with the Third British National Survey of Sexual Attitudes & Lifestyles (Natsal3) Sexually Transmitted Infections. 89: A256.2-A256. DOI: 10.1136/Sextrans-2013-051184.0796  0.388
2013 Erens B, Burkill S, Copas A, Couper M, Conrad F. OP33 How Well do Volunteer Web Panel Surveys Measure Sensitive Behaviours in the General Population, and can they be Improved? A Comparison with the Third British National Survey of Sexual Attitudes & Lifestyles (Natsal3) Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health. 67: A17.2-A18. DOI: 10.1136/Jech-2013-203126.33  0.394
2013 Conrad FG, Broome JS, Benkí JR, Kreuter F, Groves RM, Vannette D, Mcclain C. Interviewer speech and the success of survey invitations Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series a: Statistics in Society. 176: 191-210. DOI: 10.1111/J.1467-985X.2012.01064.X  0.664
2013 Lind LH, Schober MF, Conrad FG, Reichert H. Why do survey respondents disclose more when computers ask the questions? Public Opinion Quarterly. 77: 888-935. DOI: 10.1093/Poq/Nft038  0.376
2012 Freedman VA, Stafford F, Schwarz N, Conrad F, Cornman JC. Disability, participation, and subjective wellbeing among older couples. Social Science & Medicine (1982). 74: 588-96. PMID 22226156 DOI: 10.1016/J.Socscimed.2011.10.018  0.357
2012 Freedman VA, Stafford F, Conrad F, Schwarz N, Cornman JC. Assessing Time-Diary Quality for Older Couples: An Analysis of the PSID Disability and Use-of-Time Supplement Annals of Economics and Statistics. 271-289. DOI: 10.2307/23646465  0.367
2011 Yan T, Conrad FG, Tourangeau R, Couper MP. Should i stay or should i go: The effects of progress feedback, promised task duration, and length of questionnaire on completing web surveys International Journal of Public Opinion Research. 23: 131-147. DOI: 10.1093/Ijpor/Edq046  0.31
2010 Peytchev A, Conrad FG, Couper MP, Tourangeau R. Increasing Respondents' Use of Definitions in Web Surveys. Journal of Official Statistics. 26: 633-650. PMID 23411499  0.337
2010 Couper MP, Singer E, Conrad FG, Groves RM. Experimental Studies of Disclosure Risk, Disclosure Harm, Topic Sensitivity, and Survey Participation. Journal of Official Statistics. 26: 287-300. PMID 21765576  0.331
2009 Conrad FG, Blair J. Sources of error in cognitive interviews Public Opinion Quarterly. 73: 32-55. DOI: 10.1093/Poq/Nfp013  0.365
2009 Conrad FG, Bederson BB, Lewis B, Peytcheva E, Traugott MW, Hanmer MJ, Herrnson PS, Niemi RG. Electronic voting eliminates hanging chads but introduces new usability challenges International Journal of Human Computer Studies. 67: 111-124. DOI: 10.1016/J.Ijhcs.2008.09.010  0.32
2008 Galesic M, Tourangeau R, Couper MP, Conrad FG. Eye-Tracking Data: New Insights on Response Order Effects and Other Cognitive Shortcuts in Survey Responding. Public Opinion Quarterly. 72: 892-913. PMID 21253437 DOI: 10.1093/Poq/Nfn059  0.369
2007 Tonn BE, Conrad F. THINKING ABOUT THE FUTURE: A PSYCHOLOGICAL ANALYSIS Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal. 35: 889-902. DOI: 10.2224/Sbp.2007.35.7.889  0.344
2007 Ehlen P, Schober MF, Conrad FG. Modeling speech disfluency to predict conceptual misalignment in speech survey interfaces Discourse Processes. 44: 245-265. DOI: 10.17877/De290R-14201  0.361
2007 Couper MP, Conrad FG, Tourangeau R. Visual context effects in web surveys Public Opinion Quarterly. 71: 623-634. DOI: 10.1093/Poq/Nfm044  0.394
2007 Tourangeau R, Couper MP, Conrad F. Color, labels, and interpretive heuristics for response scales Public Opinion Quarterly. 71: 91-112. DOI: 10.1093/Poq/Nfl046  0.333
2007 Conrad FG, Schober MF, Coiner T. Bringing features of human dialogue to web surveys Applied Cognitive Psychology. 21: 165-187. DOI: 10.1002/Acp.1335  0.42
2007 Belli RF, Conrad FG, Wright DB. Cognitive psychology and survey methodology: Nurturing the continuing dialogue between disciplines Applied Cognitive Psychology. 21: 141-144. DOI: 10.1002/Acp.1333  0.348
2007 Conrad FG, Schober MF. Envisioning the Survey Interview of the Future Envisioning the Survey Interview of the Future. 1-298. DOI: 10.1002/9780470183373  0.325
2006 Couper MP, Tourangeau R, Conrad FG, Singer E. Evaluating the effectiveness of visual analog scales: A web experiment Social Science Computer Review. 24: 227-245. DOI: 10.1177/0894439305281503  0.392
2006 Tonn B, Hemrick A, Conrad F. Cognitive representations of the future: Survey results Futures. 38: 810-829. DOI: 10.1016/J.Futures.2005.12.005  0.425
2004 Couper MP, Tourangeau R, Conrad FG, Crawford SD. What They See Is What We Get: Response Options for Web Surveys Social Science Computer Review. 22: 111-127. DOI: 10.1177/0894439303256555  0.393
2004 Tourangeau R, Couper MP, Conrad F. Spacing, position, and order: Interpretive heuristics for visual features of survey questions Public Opinion Quarterly. 68: 368-393. DOI: 10.1093/Poq/Nfh035  0.377
2004 Schober MF, Conrad FG, Fricker SS. Misunderstanding standardized language in research interviews Applied Cognitive Psychology. 18: 169-188. DOI: 10.1002/Acp.955  0.447
2003 Rips LJ, Conrad FG, Fricker SS. Straightening the seam effect in panel surveys Public Opinion Quarterly. 67: 522-554. DOI: 10.1086/378962  0.409
2000 Conrad FG, Schober MF. Clarifying question meaning in a household telephone survey Public Opinion Quarterly. 64: 1-28. DOI: 10.1086/316757  0.474
1998 Conrad FG, Brown NR, Cashman ER. Strategies for estimating behavioural frequency in survey interviews. Memory (Hove, England). 6: 339-66. PMID 9829096 DOI: 10.1080/741942603  0.399
1997 Schober MF, Conrad FG. Does conversational interviewing reduce survey measurement error? Public Opinion Quarterly. 61: 576-602. DOI: 10.1086/297818  0.411
1986 Conrad FG, Rips LJ. Conceptual combination and the given/new distinction Journal of Memory and Language. 25: 255-278. DOI: 10.1016/0749-596X(86)90001-X  0.317
Show low-probability matches.