David E. Fencsik - Publications

Affiliations: 
California State University, East Bay, Hayward, CA, United States 

19 high-probability publications. We are testing a new system for linking publications to authors. You can help! If you notice any inaccuracies, please sign in and mark papers as correct or incorrect matches. If you identify any major omissions or other inaccuracies in the publication list, please let us know.

Year Citation  Score
2011 Palmer EM, Fencsik DE, Flusberg SJ, Horowitz TS, Wolfe JM. Signal detection evidence for limited capacity in visual search. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics. 73: 2413-24. PMID 21901574 DOI: 10.3758/s13414-011-0199-2  0.701
2011 Palmer E, Fencsik D, Horowitz T, Wolfe J. Signal detection evidence for an attentional bottleneck in spatial configuration visual search F1000research. 11: 1311-1311. DOI: 10.7490/F1000Research.1348.1  0.694
2011 Fencsik D, Wendel L, Wolfe J, Horowitz T. Faster is more efficient in visual search for motion Journal of Vision. 11: 1302-1302. DOI: 10.1167/11.11.1302  0.5
2010 Fencsik D, Heaton J. Durability of feature-based and object-based representations in visual short-term memory Journal of Vision. 9: 587-587. DOI: 10.1167/9.8.587  0.341
2010 Fencsik DE, Place SS, Wolfe JM, Horowitz TS. Faster is not necessarily better in visual search Journal of Vision. 7: 710-710. DOI: 10.1167/7.9.710  0.521
2010 Horowitz TS, Fine EM, Fencsik D, Yurgenson S, Wolfe JM. Fixational eye movements do not predict attentional benefits Journal of Vision. 6: 90-90. DOI: 10.1167/6.6.90  0.465
2010 Fencsik DE, Horowitz TS, Flusberg SJ, Wolfe JM. Change detection has no foresight: Measuring advanced knowledge of changes across displays Journal of Vision. 6: 789-789. DOI: 10.1167/6.6.789  0.42
2010 Wolfe JM, Horowitz TS, Fencsik DE, Flusberg SJ. Visual search has no foresight Journal of Vision. 6: 788-788. DOI: 10.1167/6.6.788  0.534
2010 Fencsik DE, Horowitz TS, Place SS, Klieger SB, Wolfe JM. Target tracking during interruption in the multiple-object tracking task Journal of Vision. 5: 28-28. DOI: 10.1167/5.8.28  0.552
2010 Rich A, English T, Fencsik D. Visual working memory for multiple feature changes: evidence from synaesthesia Journal of Vision. 10: 773-773. DOI: 10.1167/10.7.773  0.591
2010 Fencsik D, Place S, Johnson M, Horowitz T. Rapid Recovery of Moving Targets Following Task Disruption Journal of Vision. 10: 321-321. DOI: 10.1167/10.7.321  0.428
2007 Fencsik DE, Klieger SB, Horowitz TS. The role of location and motion information in the tracking and recovery of moving objects. Perception & Psychophysics. 69: 567-77. PMID 17727110 DOI: 10.3758/Bf03193914  0.378
2007 Horowitz TS, Klieger SB, Fencsik DE, Yang KK, Alvarez GA, Wolfe JM. Tracking unique objects. Perception & Psychophysics. 69: 172-84. PMID 17557588 DOI: 10.3758/Bf03193740  0.496
2007 Horowitz TS, Fine EM, Fencsik DE, Yurgenson S, Wolfe JM. Fixational eye movements are not an index of covert attention. Psychological Science. 18: 356-63. PMID 17470262 DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01903.x  0.565
2007 Horowitz TS, Fencsik DE, Fine EM, Yurgenson S, Wolfe JM. Microsaccades and attention: Does a weak correlation make an index? Reply to laubrock, engbert, rolfs, and kliegl (2007) Psychological Science. 18: 367-368. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01905.x  0.519
2006 Horowitz TS, Birnkrant RS, Fencsik DE, Tran L, Wolfe JM. How do we track invisible objects? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 13: 516-23. PMID 17048740 DOI: 10.3758/Bf03193879  0.55
2004 Fencsik DE, Horowitz TS, Kliege SB, Wolf JM. Target reacquisition strategies in multiple object tracking Journal of Vision. 4: 370-370. DOI: 10.1167/4.8.370  0.312
2004 Horowitz TS, Birnkrant RS, Wolfe JM, Tran L, Fencsik DE. Tracking invisible objects Journal of Vision. 4: 366-366. DOI: 10.1167/4.8.366  0.458
2001 Schumacher EH, Seymour TL, Glass JM, Fencsik DE, Lauber EJ, Kieras DE, Meyer DE. Virtually perfect time sharing in dual-task performance: uncorking the central cognitive bottleneck. Psychological Science. 12: 101-8. PMID 11340917 DOI: 10.1111/1467-9280.00318  0.58
Show low-probability matches.