☰

Earl E. Johnson, Ph.D. - Publications

Affiliations: 
2007 Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 
Area:
Audiology
Tree Info Grants Similar researchers PubMed Report error

27 high-probability publications. We are testing a new system for linking publications to authors. You can help! If you notice any inaccuracies, please sign in and mark papers as correct or incorrect matches. If you identify any major omissions or other inaccuracies in the publication list, please let us know.

Year Citation  Score
2019 Johnson E. Essentials of modern hearing aids: selection, fitting, and verification International Journal of Audiology. 58: 379-379. DOI: 10.1080/14992027.2019.1580391  0.372
2018 Johnson EE. Realistic Expectations for Speech Recognition with Digital Hearing Aid Devices Providing Acoustic Amplification and Noise Averting Microphones The Volta Review. 117: 100-145. DOI: 10.17955/TVR.117.1.2.786  0.412
2018 Johnson EE. Otc Hearing Aids: Balancing Safety and Accessibility The Hearing Journal. 71: 34. DOI: 10.1097/01.Hj.0000529847.85999.05  0.409
2017 Ching TYC, Zhang VW, Johnson EE, Van Buynder P, Hou S, Burns L, Button L, Flynn C, McGhie K. Hearing aid fitting and developmental outcomes of children fit according to either the NAL or DSL prescription: fit-to-target, audibility, speech and language abilities. International Journal of Audiology. 1-14. PMID 28971727 DOI: 10.1080/14992027.2017.1380851  0.397
2017 Johnson EE. Safety limit warning levels for the avoidance of excessive sound amplification to protect against further hearing loss. International Journal of Audiology. 1-9. PMID 28687060 DOI: 10.1080/14992027.2017.1346306  0.486
2017 Johnson EE. Hearing aid technology: model-based concepts and assessment. International Journal of Audiology. 1-2. PMID 28635502 DOI: 10.1080/14992027.2017.1292430  0.373
2015 Johnson EE, Light KC. A Patient-Centered, Provider-Facilitated Approach to the Refinement of Nonlinear Frequency Compression Parameters Based on Subjective Preference Ratings of Amplified Sound Quality. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology. 26: 689-702. PMID 26333877 DOI: 10.3766/Jaaa.14053  0.494
2015 Ching TY, Quar TK, Johnson EE, Newall P, Sharma M. Comparing NAL-NL1 and DSL v5 in Hearing Aids Fit to Children with Severe or Profound Hearing Loss: Goodness of Fit-to-Targets, Impacts on Predicted Loudness and Speech Intelligibility. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology. 26: 260-74. PMID 25751694 DOI: 10.3766/Jaaa.26.3.6  0.524
2013 Ching TY, Johnson EE, Seeto M, Macrae JH. Hearing-aid safety: a comparison of estimated threshold shifts for gains recommended by NAL-NL2 and DSL m[i/o] prescriptions for children. International Journal of Audiology. 52: S39-45. PMID 24350693 DOI: 10.3109/14992027.2013.847976  0.405
2013 Ching TY, Johnson EE, Hou S, Dillon H, Zhang V, Burns L, van Buynder P, Wong A, Flynn C. A comparison of NAL and DSL prescriptive methods for paediatric hearing-aid fitting: predicted speech intelligibility and loudness. International Journal of Audiology. 52: S29-38. PMID 24350692 DOI: 10.3109/14992027.2013.765041  0.444
2013 Johnson EE. Modern prescription theory and application: realistic expectations for speech recognition with hearing AIDS. Trends in Hearing. 17: 143-70. PMID 24253361 DOI: 10.1177/1084713813506301  0.487
2013 Johnson EE. Prescriptive amplification recommendations for hearing losses with a conductive component and their impact on the required maximum power output: an update with accompanying clinical explanation. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology. 24: 452-60. PMID 23886423 DOI: 10.3766/Jaaa.24.6.2  0.512
2013 Johnson EE. An initial-fit comparison of two generic hearing aid prescriptive methods (NAL-NL2 and CAM2) to individuals having mild to moderately severe high-frequency hearing loss. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology. 24: 138-50. PMID 23357807 DOI: 10.3766/Jaaa.24.2.7  0.555
2011 Johnson EE, Dillon H. A comparison of gain for adults from generic hearing aid prescriptive methods: impacts on predicted loudness, frequency bandwidth, and speech intelligibility. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology. 22: 441-59. PMID 21993050 DOI: 10.3766/Jaaa.22.7.5  0.55
2011 Johnson EE. Determinants of Department of Veterans Affairs hearing aid brand dispensing by individual audiologists. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development. 48: 865-80. PMID 21938670  0.403
2011 Hornsby BW, Johnson EE, Picou E. Effects of degree and configuration of hearing loss on the contribution of high- and low-frequency speech information to bilateral speech understanding. Ear and Hearing. 32: 543-55. PMID 21336138 DOI: 10.1097/Aud.0B013E31820E5028  0.542
2010 Johnson EE, Ricketts TA. Dispensing rates of four common hearing aid product features: associations with variations in practice among audiologists. Trends in Amplification. 14: 12-45. PMID 20457726 DOI: 10.1177/1084713810362988  0.629
2010 Johnson EE. How do hearing aid dispensers pick their buying preferences The Hearing Journal. 63: 10-14. DOI: 10.1097/01.Hj.0000369560.68431.15  0.532
2009 Johnson EE, Mueller HG, Ricketts TA. Statistically derived factors of varied importance to audiologists when making a hearing aid brand preference decision. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology. 20: 40-8. PMID 19927681 DOI: 10.3766/Jaaa.20.1.4  0.645
2009 Johnson E, Ricketts T, Hornsby B. The effect of extending high-frequency bandwidth on the acceptable noise level (ANL) of hearing-impaired listeners. International Journal of Audiology. 48: 353-62. PMID 19925343 DOI: 10.1080/14992020802662964  0.658
2008 Ricketts TA, Johnson E, Federman J. Individual differences within and across feedback suppression hearing aids Journal of the American Academy of Audiology. 19: 748-757. PMID 19358455 DOI: 10.3766/Jaaa.19.10.3  0.607
2008 Ricketts TA, Dittberner AB, Johnson EE. High-frequency amplification and sound quality in listeners with normal through moderate hearing loss. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research : Jslhr. 51: 160-72. PMID 18230863 DOI: 10.1044/1092-4388(2008/012)  0.696
2008 Johnson EE. Despite having more advanced features, hearing aids hold line on retail price The Hearing Journal. 61: 42-48. DOI: 10.1097/01.Hj.0000315830.07519.99  0.368
2007 Johnson EE, Ricketts TA, Hornsby BW. The effect of digital phase cancellation feedback reduction systems on amplified sound quality. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology. 18: 404-16. PMID 17715650 DOI: 10.3766/Jaaa.18.5.5  0.647
2007 Johnson EE. Survey Explores How Dispensers Use and Choose their Preferred Hearing Aid Brands The Hearing Journal. 60: 23-24. DOI: 10.1097/01.Hj.0000286712.47920.E8  0.482
2006 Hornsby BW, Ricketts TA, Johnson EE. The effects of speech and speechlike maskers on unaided and aided speech recognition in persons with hearing loss. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology. 17: 432-47. PMID 16869056 DOI: 10.3766/Jaaa.17.6.5  0.671
2005 Ricketts TA, Hornsby BWY, Johnson EE. Adaptive directional benefit in the near field: Competing sound angle and level effects Seminars in Hearing. 26: 59-69. DOI: 10.1055/S-2005-871003  0.574
Show low-probability matches.