Year |
Citation |
Score |
2020 |
Gignac GE, Walker B, Burtenshaw T, Fay N. On the nonlinear association between intelligence and openness: Not much of an effect beyond an average IQ Personality and Individual Differences. 166: 110169. DOI: 10.1016/J.Paid.2020.110169 |
0.369 |
|
2020 |
Gignac GE, Callis ZMV. The costs of being exceptionally intelligent: Compatibility and interpersonal skill concerns Intelligence. 81: 101465. DOI: 10.1016/J.Intell.2020.101465 |
0.32 |
|
2020 |
Gignac GE, Zajenkowski M. The Dunning-Kruger effect is (mostly) a statistical artefact: Valid approaches to testing the hypothesis with individual differences data Intelligence. 80: 101449. DOI: 10.1016/J.Intell.2020.101449 |
0.355 |
|
2019 |
English MCW, Gignac GE, Visser TAW, Whitehouse AJO, Maybery MT. A comprehensive psychometric analysis of autism-spectrum quotient factor models using two large samples: Model recommendations and the influence of divergent traits on total-scale scores. Autism Research : Official Journal of the International Society For Autism Research. PMID 31464106 DOI: 10.1002/Aur.2198 |
0.434 |
|
2019 |
Kretzschmar A, Gignac GE. At what sample size do latent variable correlations stabilize? Journal of Research in Personality. 80: 17-22. DOI: 10.1016/J.Jrp.2019.03.007 |
0.648 |
|
2019 |
Gignac GE, Bartulovich A, Salleo E. Maximum effort may not be required for valid intelligence test score interpretations Intelligence. 75: 73-84. DOI: 10.1016/J.Intell.2019.04.007 |
0.336 |
|
2019 |
Gignac GE, Zajenkowski M. People tend to overestimate their romantic partner's intelligence even more than their own Intelligence. 73: 41-51. DOI: 10.1016/J.Intell.2019.01.004 |
0.3 |
|
2018 |
Gignac GE, Starbuck CL. Exceptional intelligence and easygoingness may hurt your prospects: Threshold effects for rated mate characteristics. British Journal of Psychology (London, England : 1953). PMID 30132805 DOI: 10.1111/Bjop.12342 |
0.315 |
|
2018 |
Gignac GE, Wong KK. A Psychometric Examination of the Anagram Persistence Task: More Than Two Unsolvable Anagrams May Not Be Better. Assessment. 1073191118789260. PMID 30019913 DOI: 10.1177/1073191118789260 |
0.381 |
|
2018 |
Gignac GE. A moderate financial incentive can increase effort, but not intelligence test performance in adult volunteers. British Journal of Psychology (London, England : 1953). PMID 29427313 DOI: 10.1111/Bjop.12288 |
0.344 |
|
2018 |
Gignac GE, Kovacs K, Reynolds MR. Backward and forward serial recall across modalities: An individual differences perspective☆ Personality and Individual Differences. 121: 147-151. DOI: 10.1016/J.Paid.2017.09.033 |
0.388 |
|
2018 |
Singh KA, Gignac GE, Brydges CR, Ecker UK. Working memory capacity mediates the relationship between removal and fluid intelligence Journal of Memory and Language. 101: 18-36. DOI: 10.1016/J.Jml.2018.03.002 |
0.31 |
|
2018 |
Zajenkowski M, Gignac GE. Why do angry people overestimate their intelligence? Neuroticism as a suppressor of the association between Trait-Anger and subjectively assessed intelligence Intelligence. 70: 12-21. DOI: 10.1016/J.Intell.2018.07.003 |
0.36 |
|
2018 |
Gignac GE. Socially desirable responding suppresses the association between self-assessed intelligence and task-based intelligence Intelligence. 69: 50-58. DOI: 10.1016/J.Intell.2018.05.003 |
0.374 |
|
2018 |
Brydges CR, Gignac GE, Ecker UK. Working memory capacity, short-term memory capacity, and the continued influence effect: A latent-variable analysis Intelligence. 69: 117-122. DOI: 10.1016/J.Intell.2018.03.009 |
0.3 |
|
2017 |
Gignac GE, Reynolds MR, Kovacs K. Digit Span Subscale Scores May Be Insufficiently Reliable for Clinical Interpretation: Distinguishing Between Stratified Coefficient Alpha and Omega Hierarchical. Assessment. 1073191117748396. PMID 29254353 DOI: 10.1177/1073191117748396 |
0.352 |
|
2017 |
Mitchell CAA, Maybery MT, Russell-Smith SN, Collerton D, Gignac GE, Waters F. The Structure and Measurement of Unusual Sensory Experiences in Different Modalities: The Multi-Modality Unusual Sensory Experiences Questionnaire (MUSEQ). Frontiers in Psychology. 8: 1363. PMID 28848477 DOI: 10.3389/Fpsyg.2017.01363 |
0.38 |
|
2017 |
Allanson F, Pestell C, Gignac GE, Yeo YX, Weinborn M. Neuropsychological Predictors of Outcome Following Traumatic Brain Injury in Adults: a Meta-Analysis. Neuropsychology Review. PMID 28681109 DOI: 10.1007/S11065-017-9353-5 |
0.339 |
|
2017 |
Amiruddin A, Fueggle SN, Nguyen AT, Gignac GE, Clunies-Ross KL, Fox AM. Error monitoring and empathy: Explorations within a neurophysiological context. Psychophysiology. PMID 28218803 DOI: 10.1111/Psyp.12846 |
0.337 |
|
2017 |
Gignac GE, Bates TC. Brain volume and intelligence: The moderating role of intelligence measurement quality Intelligence. 64: 18-29. DOI: 10.1016/J.Intell.2017.06.004 |
0.332 |
|
2017 |
Gignac GE, Kretzschmar A. Evaluating dimensional distinctness with correlated-factor models: Limitations and suggestions Intelligence. 62: 138-147. DOI: 10.1016/J.Intell.2017.04.001 |
0.661 |
|
2016 |
Gignac GE, Szodorai ET. Effect size guidelines for individual differences researchers Personality and Individual Differences. 102: 74-78. DOI: 10.1016/J.Paid.2016.06.069 |
0.367 |
|
2016 |
Gignac GE, Shankaralingam M, Walker K, Kilpatrick P. Short-term memory for faces relates to general intelligence moderately Intelligence. 57: 96-104. DOI: 10.1016/J.Intell.2016.05.001 |
0.324 |
|
2016 |
Gignac GE. On the evaluation of competing theories: A reply to van der Maas and Kan Intelligence. 57: 84-86. DOI: 10.1016/J.Intell.2016.03.006 |
0.373 |
|
2016 |
Gignac GE. Residual group-level factor associations: Possibly negative implications for the mutualism theory of general intelligence Intelligence. 55: 69-78. DOI: 10.1016/J.Intell.2016.01.007 |
0.389 |
|
2016 |
Gignac GE. The higher-order model imposes a proportionality constraint: That is why the bifactor model tends to fit better Intelligence. 55: 57-68. DOI: 10.1016/J.Intell.2016.01.006 |
0.357 |
|
2015 |
Lewandowsky S, Gignac GE, Oberauer K. Correction: The Role of Conspiracist Ideation and Worldviews in Predicting Rejection of Science. Plos One. 10: e0134773. PMID 26270483 DOI: 10.1371/Journal.Pone.0134773 |
0.348 |
|
2015 |
Gignac GE, Weiss LG. Digit Span Is (Mostly) Related Linearly to General Intelligence: Every Extra Bit of Span Counts. Psychological Assessment. PMID 25774642 DOI: 10.1037/Pas0000105 |
0.359 |
|
2015 |
Gignac GE. Estimating the Strength of a General Factor: Coefficient Omega Hierarchical Industrial and Organizational Psychology. 8: 434-438. DOI: 10.1017/Iop.2015.59 |
0.339 |
|
2015 |
Gignac GE. Raven's is not a pure measure of general intelligence: Implications for g factor theory and the brief measurement of g Intelligence. 52: 71-79. DOI: 10.1016/J.Intell.2015.07.006 |
0.352 |
|
2015 |
Gignac GE, Watkins MW. There may be nothing special about the association between working memory capacity and fluid intelligence Intelligence. 52: 18-23. DOI: 10.1016/J.Intell.2015.06.006 |
0.325 |
|
2015 |
Gignac GE. The magical numbers 7 and 4 are resistant to the Flynn effect: No evidence for increases in forward or backward recall across 85 years of data Intelligence. 48: 85-95. DOI: 10.1016/J.Intell.2014.11.001 |
0.346 |
|
2014 |
Gignac GE. On the Inappropriateness of Using Items to Calculate Total Scale Score Reliability via Coefficient Alpha for Multidimensional Scales European Journal of Psychological Assessment. 30: 130-139. DOI: 10.1027/1015-5759/A000181 |
0.37 |
|
2014 |
Gignac GE, Karatamoglou A, Wee S, Palacios G. Emotional intelligence as a unique predictor of individual differences in humour styles and humour appreciation Personality and Individual Differences. 56: 34-39. DOI: 10.1016/J.Paid.2013.08.020 |
0.407 |
|
2014 |
Gignac GE. Fluid intelligence shares closer to 60% of its variance with working memory capacity and is a better indicator of general intelligence Intelligence. 47: 122-133. DOI: 10.1016/J.Intell.2014.09.004 |
0.439 |
|
2014 |
Gignac GE. Dynamic mutualism versus g factor theory: An empirical test. Intelligence. 42: 89-97. DOI: 10.1016/J.Intell.2013.11.004 |
0.349 |
|
2013 |
Gignac GE, Watkins MW. Bifactor Modeling and the Estimation of Model-Based Reliability in the WAIS-IV. Multivariate Behavioral Research. 48: 639-62. PMID 26741057 DOI: 10.1080/00273171.2013.804398 |
0.424 |
|
2013 |
Gignac GE. Modeling the balanced inventory of desirable responding: evidence in favor of a revised model of socially desirable responding. Journal of Personality Assessment. 95: 645-56. PMID 23862685 DOI: 10.1080/00223891.2013.816717 |
0.429 |
|
2012 |
Palmer BR, Gignac G. The impact of emotionally intelligent leadership on talent retention, discretionary effort and employment brand Industrial and Commercial Training. 44: 9-18. DOI: 10.1108/00197851211193372 |
0.347 |
|
2011 |
Gignac GE, Palmer BR. The Genos employee motivation assessment Industrial and Commercial Training. 43: 79-87. DOI: 10.1108/00197851111108908 |
0.353 |
|
2010 |
Gignac GE. On a Nomenclature for Emotional Intelligence Research Industrial and Organizational Psychology. 3: 131-135. DOI: 10.1111/J.1754-9434.2010.01212.X |
0.34 |
|
2010 |
Gignac G. Seven-factor model of emotional intelligence as measured by Genos EI: A confirmatory factor analytic investigation based on self-and rater-report data European Journal of Psychological Assessment. 26: 309-316. DOI: 10.1027/1015-5759/A000041 |
0.414 |
|
2010 |
Gignac GE, Ekermans G. Group differences in EI within a sample of black and white South Africans Personality and Individual Differences. 49: 639-644. DOI: 10.1016/J.Paid.2010.05.039 |
0.321 |
|
2009 |
Gignac GE. Partial confirmatory factor analysis: described and illustrated on the NEO-PI-R. Journal of Personality Assessment. 91: 40-7. PMID 19085282 DOI: 10.1080/00223890802484126 |
0.404 |
|
2009 |
Gignac GE, Powell MB. A psychometric evaluation of the Gudjonsson Suggestibility Scales : problems associated with measuring suggestibility as a difference score composite Personality and Individual Differences. 46: 88-93. DOI: 10.1016/J.Paid.2008.09.007 |
0.409 |
|
2007 |
Gignac GE, Palmer BR, Stough C. A confirmatory factor analytic investigation of the TAS-20: corroboration of a five-factor model and suggestions for improvement. Journal of Personality Assessment. 89: 247-57. PMID 18001225 DOI: 10.1080/00223890701629730 |
0.426 |
|
2007 |
Gignac GE, Bates TC, Jang KL. Implications relevant to CFA model misfit, reliability, and the five-factor model as measured by the NEO-FFI Personality and Individual Differences. 43: 1051-1062. DOI: 10.1016/J.Paid.2007.02.024 |
0.406 |
|
2007 |
Gignac GE. Multi-factor modeling in individual differences research: Some recommendations and suggestions Personality and Individual Differences. 42: 37-48. DOI: 10.1016/J.Paid.2006.06.019 |
0.384 |
|
2006 |
Gignac GE, Palmer B, Bates T, Stough C. Differences in confirmatory factor analysis model close-fit index estimates obtained from AMOS 4.0 and AMOS 5.0 via full information maximum likelihood - no imputation: Corrections and extension to Palmer et al. (2003) Australian Journal of Psychology. 58: 144-150. DOI: 10.1080/00049530500504088 |
0.381 |
|
2006 |
Gignac GE. The WAIS-III as a Nested Factors Model A Useful Alternative to the More Conventional Oblique and Higher-Order Models Journal of Individual Differences. 27: 73-86. DOI: 10.1027/1614-0001.27.2.73 |
0.396 |
|
2006 |
Gignac GE. Self-reported emotional intelligence and life satisfaction: Testing incremental predictive validity hypotheses via structural equation modeling (SEM) in a small sample Personality and Individual Differences. 40: 1569-1577. DOI: 10.1016/J.Paid.2006.01.001 |
0.352 |
|
2006 |
Gignac GE. Evaluating subtest ‘g’ saturation levels via the single trait-correlated uniqueness (STCU) SEM approach: Evidence in favor of crystallized subtests as the best indicators of ‘g’ Intelligence. 34: 29-46. DOI: 10.1016/J.Intell.2005.06.001 |
0.403 |
|
2006 |
Gignac GE, Powell MB. A Direct Examination of the Nonlinear (Quadratic) Association between Intelligence and Suggestibility in Children Applied Cognitive Psychology. 20: 617-623. DOI: 10.1002/Acp.1213 |
0.375 |
|
2005 |
Gignac GE. Revisiting the factor structure of the WAIS-R: insights through nested factor modeling. Assessment. 12: 320-9. PMID 16123252 DOI: 10.1177/1073191105278118 |
0.434 |
|
2005 |
Gignac GE. Evaluating the MSCEIT V2.0 via CFA: comment on Mayer et al. (2003). Emotion (Washington, D.C.). 5: 233-5; discussion 23. PMID 15982088 DOI: 10.1037/1528-3542.5.2.233 |
0.343 |
|
2005 |
Gignac GE, Palmer BR, Manocha R, Stough C. An examination of the factor structure of the schutte self-report emotional intelligence (SSREI) scale via confirmatory factor analysis Personality and Individual Differences. 39: 1029-1042. DOI: 10.1016/J.Paid.2005.03.014 |
0.377 |
|
2005 |
Palmer BR, Gignac GE, Manocha R, Stough C. A psychometric evaluation of the Mayer-Salovey-Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test Version 2.0 Intelligence. 33: 285-305. DOI: 10.1016/J.Intell.2004.11.003 |
0.382 |
|
2005 |
Gignac GE. Openness to experience, general intelligence and crystallized intelligence: A methodological extension Intelligence. 33: 161-167. DOI: 10.1016/J.Intell.2004.11.001 |
0.396 |
|
2004 |
Gignac GE, Stough C, Loukomitis S. Openness, intelligence, and self-report intelligence Intelligence. 32: 133-143. DOI: 10.1016/J.Intell.2003.10.005 |
0.353 |
|
2003 |
Palmer BR, Gignac GE, Bates TC, Stough C. Examining the structure of the trait meta-mood scale Australian Journal of Psychology. 55: 154-158. DOI: 10.1080/0004953042000298612 |
0.39 |
|
2003 |
Palmer BR, Manocha R, Gignac GE, Stough C. Examining the factor structure of the Bar-On Emotional Quotient Inventory with an Australian general population sample Personality and Individual Differences. 35: 1191-1210. DOI: 10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00328-8 |
0.36 |
|
Show low-probability matches. |