Christian Olivers - Publications

Affiliations: 
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands 

157 high-probability publications. We are testing a new system for linking publications to authors. You can help! If you notice any inaccuracies, please sign in and mark papers as correct or incorrect matches. If you identify any major omissions or other inaccuracies in the publication list, please let us know.

Year Citation  Score
2024 Veríssimo IS, Nudelman Z, Olivers CNL. Does crowding predict conjunction search? An individual differences approach. Vision Research. 216: 108342. PMID 38198971 DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2023.108342  0.362
2023 van Heusden E, Olivers CNL, Donk M. The effects of eccentricity on attentional capture. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics. PMID 37258897 DOI: 10.3758/s13414-023-02735-z  0.395
2023 Chota S, Gayet S, Kenemans JL, Olivers CNL, Van der Stigchel S. A matter of availability: sharper tuning for memorized than for perceived stimulus features. Cerebral Cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991). PMID 37005059 DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhad064  0.477
2023 Li A, Chen Z, Wolfe JM, Olivers CNL. How do people find pairs? Journal of Experimental Psychology. General. PMID 36951742 DOI: 10.1037/xge0001390  0.567
2022 Trentin C, Slagter HA, Olivers CNL. Visual working memory representations bias attention more when they are the target of an action plan. Cognition. 230: 105274. PMID 36113256 DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105274  0.517
2022 Wang B, Knapen T, Olivers CNL. Visual Working Memory Adapts to the Nature of Anticipated Interference. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 1-13. PMID 35468211 DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_01853  0.582
2021 Kruijne W, Olivers CNL, van Rijn H. Memory for Stimulus Duration Is Not Bound to Spatial Information. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 33: 1211-1229. PMID 34496404 DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_01723  0.345
2021 Veríssimo IS, Hölsken S, Olivers CNL. Individual differences in crowding predict visual search performance. Journal of Vision. 21: 29. PMID 34038508 DOI: 10.1167/jov.21.5.29  0.418
2021 van Heusden E, Donk M, Olivers CNL. The dynamics of saliency-driven and goal-driven visual selection as a function of eccentricity. Journal of Vision. 21: 2. PMID 33651878 DOI: 10.1167/jov.21.3.2  0.333
2020 Olmos-Solis K, van Loon AM, Olivers CNL. Content or status: Frontal and posterior cortical representations of object category and upcoming task goals in working memory. Cortex; a Journal Devoted to the Study of the Nervous System and Behavior. 135: 61-77. PMID 33360761 DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2020.11.011  0.478
2020 Olmos-Solis K, van Loon AM, Olivers CNL. Content or status: Frontal and posterior cortical representations of object category and upcoming task goals in working memory. Cortex; a Journal Devoted to the Study of the Nervous System and Behavior. 135: 61-77. PMID 33360761 DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2020.11.011  0.478
2020 Kruijne W, Bohte SM, Roelfsema PR, Olivers CNL. Flexible Working Memory through Selective Gating and Attentional Tagging. Neural Computation. 1-40. PMID 33080159 DOI: 10.1162/neco_a_01339  0.492
2020 Olivers CNL, Roelfsema PR. Attention for action in visual working memory. Cortex; a Journal Devoted to the Study of the Nervous System and Behavior. 131: 179-194. PMID 32892152 DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2020.07.011  0.576
2019 de Vries IEJ, Slagter HA, Olivers CNL. Oscillatory Control over Representational States in Working Memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. PMID 31791896 DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2019.11.006  0.449
2019 Günseli E, Fahrenfort JJ, van Moorselaar D, Daoultzis KC, Meeter M, Olivers CNL. EEG dynamics reveal a dissociation between storage and selective attention within working memory. Scientific Reports. 9: 13499. PMID 31534150 DOI: 10.1038/S41598-019-49577-0  0.803
2019 Van der Stigchel S, Olivers CNL. The Flexible Nature of the Interaction Between Attention and Working Memory. Journal of Cognition. 2: 31. PMID 31517242 DOI: 10.5334/joc.68  0.538
2019 Ort E, Fahrenfort JJ, Ten Cate T, Eimer M, Olivers CN. Humans can efficiently look for but not select multiple visual objects. Elife. 8. PMID 31453807 DOI: 10.7554/Elife.49130  0.355
2019 de Vries IEJ, Savran E, van Driel J, Olivers CNL. Oscillatory Mechanisms of Preparing for Visual Distraction. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 1-22. PMID 31418334 DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_01460  0.442
2019 Failing M, Feldmann-Wüstefeld T, Wang B, Olivers C, Theeuwes J. Statistical regularities induce spatial as well as feature-specific suppression. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance. PMID 31157536 DOI: 10.1037/Xhp0000660  0.452
2019 Nuthmann A, de Groot F, Huettig F, Olivers CNL. Extrafoveal attentional capture by object semantics. Plos One. 14: e0217051. PMID 31120948 DOI: 10.1371/Journal.Pone.0217051  0.333
2019 Gayet S, Moorselaar DV, Olivers CNL, Paffen CLE, Stigchel SV. Prospectively reinstated memory drives conscious access of matching visual input. Scientific Reports. 9: 4793. PMID 30886323 DOI: 10.1038/S41598-019-41350-7  0.569
2019 de Vries IEJ, van Driel J, Olivers CNL. Decoding the status of working memory representations in preparation of visual selection. Neuroimage. PMID 30840904 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.02.069  0.536
2019 van Driel J, Ort E, Fahrenfort JJ, Olivers CNL. Beta and theta oscillations differentially support free versus forced control over multiple-target search. The Journal of Neuroscience : the Official Journal of the Society For Neuroscience. PMID 30617208 DOI: 10.1523/Jneurosci.2547-18.2018  0.315
2019 Wang B, Theeuwes J, Olivers CNL. Momentary, Offset-Triggered Dual-Task Interference in Visual Working Memory Journal of Cognition. 2. DOI: 10.5334/joc.84  0.578
2019 Geyer T, Müller HJ, Olivers C. Visual cognition special issue: visual search and selective attention Visual Cognition. 27: 385-386. DOI: 10.1080/13506285.2019.1698491  0.461
2019 Alfandari D, Belopolsky AV, Olivers CNL. Eye movements reveal learning and information-seeking in attentional template acquisition Visual Cognition. 27: 467-486. DOI: 10.1080/13506285.2019.1636918  0.328
2019 van Moorselaar D, Theeuwes J, Olivers CNL. Memory-based attentional biases survive spatial suppression driven by selection history Visual Cognition. 27: 343-350. DOI: 10.1080/13506285.2019.1582571  0.568
2018 Olmos-Solis K, van Loon AM, Olivers CNL. Pupil Dilation Reflects Task Relevance Prior to Search. Journal of Cognition. 1: 11. PMID 31517185 DOI: 10.5334/joc.12  0.463
2018 van Loon AM, Olmos-Solis K, Fahrenfort JJ, Olivers CNL. Current and future goals are represented in opposite patterns in object-selective cortex. Elife. 7. PMID 30394873 DOI: 10.1167/18.10.19  0.535
2018 de Vries IEJ, van Driel J, Karacaoglu M, Olivers CNL. Priority Switches in Visual Working Memory are Supported by Frontal Delta and Posterior Alpha Interactions. Cerebral Cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991). PMID 30215669 DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhy223  0.558
2018 Ort E, Fahrenfort J, Hanke M, Kaule F, Reeder R, Pollmann S, Olivers C. Dissociating proactive from reactive control in multiple-target visual search Journal of Vision. 18: 982. DOI: 10.1167/18.10.982  0.452
2018 Wang B, Theeuwes J, Olivers C. Does visual working memory adapt to the nature of anticipated interference? Journal of Vision. 18: 699. DOI: 10.1167/18.10.699  0.638
2018 de Vries I, van Driel J, Olivers C. Posterior alpha and frontal delta oscillations interactively support priority switches within visual working memory. Journal of Vision. 18: 365. DOI: 10.1167/18.10.365  0.434
2018 Reeder R, Olivers C, Pollmann S. The visual representation of templates for rejection Journal of Vision. 18: 1222. DOI: 10.1167/18.10.1222  0.418
2018 Olmos Solis K, van Loon A, Los S, Olivers C. Microsaccades reveal the temporal dynamics of template and response preparation during visual search. Journal of Vision. 18: 1031. DOI: 10.1167/18.10.1031  0.4
2017 Hulleman J, Olivers CNL. On the brink: The demise of the item in visual search moves closer. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 40: e163. PMID 29342613 DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X16000364  0.406
2017 Olmos-Solis K, van Loon AM, Los SA, Olivers CNL. Oculomotor measures reveal the temporal dynamics of preparing for search. Progress in Brain Research. 236: 1-23. PMID 29157407 DOI: 10.1016/bs.pbr.2017.07.003  0.404
2017 Wang B, Theeuwes J, Olivers CNL. When Shorter Delays Lead to Worse Memories: Task Disruption Makes Visual Working Memory Temporarily Vulnerable to Test Interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition. PMID 29094991 DOI: 10.1037/Xlm0000468  0.536
2017 van Moorselaar D, Foster JJ, Sutterer DW, Theeuwes J, Olivers CNL, Awh E. Spatially Selective Alpha Oscillations Reveal Moment-by-Moment Trade-offs between Working Memory and Attention. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 1-11. PMID 29040014 DOI: 10.1162/Jocn_A_01198  0.728
2017 van Loon AM, Olmos-Solis K, Olivers CNL. Subtle eye movement metrics reveal task-relevant representations prior to visual search. Journal of Vision. 17: 13. PMID 28637052 DOI: 10.1167/17.6.13  0.443
2017 van Moorselaar D, Gayet S, Paffen CLE, Theeuwes J, Van der Stigchel S, Olivers CNL. Competitive interactions in visual working memory drive access to awareness. Cortex; a Journal Devoted to the Study of the Nervous System and Behavior. PMID 28483160 DOI: 10.1016/J.Cortex.2017.03.026  0.519
2017 van Driel J, Gunseli E, Meeter M, Olivers CN. Local and interregional alpha EEG dynamics dissociate between memory for search and memory for recognition. Neuroimage. PMID 28132933 DOI: 10.1016/J.Neuroimage.2017.01.031  0.831
2017 de Vries IE, van Driel J, Olivers CN. Posterior alpha EEG dynamics dissociate current from future goals in working memory guided visual search. The Journal of Neuroscience : the Official Journal of the Society For Neuroscience. PMID 28069918 DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2945-16.2016  0.569
2017 Wang B, Theeuwes J, Olivers C. When shorter delays lead to worse memories: Taking attention away from visual working memory temporarily makes it more vulnerable to test interference. Journal of Vision. 17: 111. DOI: 10.1167/17.10.111  0.619
2017 Olivers CNL. The visual mind: A special issue in honour of Glyn Humphreys Visual Cognition. 25: 1-3. DOI: 10.1080/13506285.2017.1354952  0.301
2017 de Groot F, Huettig F, Olivers CNL. Language-induced visual and semantic biases in visual search are subject to task requirements Visual Cognition. 25: 225-240. DOI: 10.1080/13506285.2017.1324934  0.428
2016 Wang B, Yan C, Wang Z, Olivers CN, Theeuwes J. Adverse orienting effects on visual working memory encoding and maintenance. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. PMID 27896633 DOI: 10.3758/S13423-016-1205-4  0.588
2016 Olivers CN, Awh E, Van der Burg E. The capacity to detect synchronous audiovisual events is severely limited: Evidence from mixture modeling. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance. 42: 2115-2124. PMID 27854458 DOI: 10.1037/xhp0000268  0.647
2016 Wang B, Cao X, Theeuwes J, Olivers CN, Wang Z. Location-based effects underlie feature conjunction benefits in visual working memory. Journal of Vision. 16: 12. PMID 27627735 DOI: 10.1167/16.11.12  0.475
2016 Grubert A, Fahrenfort J, Olivers CN, Eimer M. Rapid top-down control over template-guided attention shifts to multiple objects. Neuroimage. PMID 27554532 DOI: 10.1016/J.Neuroimage.2016.08.039  0.451
2016 Blom T, Mathôt S, Olivers CN, Van der Stigchel S. The Pupillary Light Response Reflects Encoding, but Not Maintenance, in Visual Working Memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance. PMID 27428779 DOI: 10.1037/Xhp0000252  0.523
2016 Wang B, Cao X, Theeuwes J, Olivers CN, Wang Z. Separate Capacities for Storing Different Features in Visual Working Memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition. PMID 27399920 DOI: 10.1037/Xlm0000295  0.475
2016 van Moorselaar D, Theeuwes J, Olivers CN. Learning changes the attentional status of prospective memories. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. PMID 26892228 DOI: 10.3758/S13423-016-1008-7  0.575
2016 de Vries I, van Driel J, Olivers C. Posterior alpha EEG dynamics dissociate visual search template from accessory memory items. Journal of Vision. 16: 761. DOI: 10.1167/16.12.761  0.556
2016 Fahrenfort J, van Leeuwen J, Foster J, Awh E, Olivers C. Alpha-band and raw EEG reflect distinct maintenance mechanisms during working memory Journal of Vision. 16: 711. DOI: 10.1167/16.12.711  0.319
2016 van Loon A, Archeo C, Olivers C. Tracking the dynamics of visual working memory representations using steady-state-visual-evoked potentials Journal of Vision. 16: 710. DOI: 10.1167/16.12.710  0.459
2016 van Driel J, Gunseli E, Meeter M, Olivers C. Local and interregional alpha oscillatory dynamics are sensitive to different levels of working memory-guided visual search Journal of Vision. 16: 709. DOI: 10.1167/16.12.709  0.802
2016 Wang B, Yan C, Wang Z, Theeuwes J, Olivers C. Inhibition of Return in Visual Working Memory Journal of Vision. 16: 364. DOI: 10.1167/16.12.364  0.593
2016 Van der Stigchel S, Blom T, Olivers C, Mathot S. The pupillary light response reflects encoding, but not maintenance, in visual working memory Journal of Vision. 16: 363. DOI: 10.1167/16.12.363  0.459
2016 Dowd EW, Gunseli E, Meeter M, Olivers C, Egner T. Changes in task-irrelevant context invoke updating of task-relevant representations in working memory Journal of Vision. 16: 351. DOI: 10.1167/16.12.351  0.798
2016 Ort E, Fahrenfort J, Olivers C. Control over target selection determines switch costs in multiple-target search. Journal of Vision. 16: 1287. DOI: 10.1167/16.12.1287  0.306
2016 Olivers C, Belopolsky A. Oculomotor Measures of Learning Attentional Templates Journal of Vision. 16: 120. DOI: 10.1167/16.12.120  0.318
2016 Olmos Solis K, Van Loon A, Olivers C. Tracking the dynamics of working memory representations through the eyes Journal of Vision. 16: 1161. DOI: 10.1167/16.12.1161  0.324
2016 de Groot F, Huettig F, Olivers CNL. Revisiting the looking at nothing phenomenon: Visual and semantic biases in memory search Visual Cognition. 24: 226-245. DOI: 10.1080/13506285.2016.1221013  0.455
2015 Hulleman J, Olivers CN. The impending demise of the item in visual search. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 1-76. PMID 26673054 DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X15002794  0.372
2015 Gunseli E, Olivers CN, Meeter M. Task-Irrelevant Memories Rapidly Gain Attentional Control With Learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance. PMID 26436527 DOI: 10.1037/Xhp0000134  0.84
2015 van Moorselaar D, Theeuwes J, Olivers C. The limitations of visual working memory in prioritizing visual stimuli for conscious access. Journal of Vision. 15: 869. PMID 26326557 DOI: 10.1167/15.12.869  0.51
2015 Gunseli E, Fahrenfort J, Daoultzis K, Meeter M, Olivers C. The Loss of Information from Visual Working Memory depends on Retro-Cue Reliability. Journal of Vision. 15: 91. PMID 26325779 DOI: 10.1167/15.12.91  0.818
2015 de Groot F, Huettig F, Olivers CN. When Meaning Matters: The Temporal Dynamics of Semantic Influences on Visual Attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance. PMID 26322686 DOI: 10.1037/Xhp0000102  0.399
2015 Schreij D, Olivers CN. The behavioral urgency of objects approaching your avatar. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics. 77: 2669-83. PMID 26231510 DOI: 10.3758/S13414-015-0966-6  0.353
2015 Gunseli E, van Moorselaar D, Meeter M, Olivers CN. Erratum to: The reliability of retro-cues determines the fate of noncued visual working memory representations. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 22: 1474. PMID 26223470 DOI: 10.3758/S13423-015-0914-4  0.781
2015 van Moorselaar D, Olivers CN, Theeuwes J, Lamme VA, Sligte IG. Forgotten But Not Gone: Retro-Cue Costs and Benefits in a Double-Cueing Paradigm Suggest Multiple States in Visual Short-Term Memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition. PMID 25867613 DOI: 10.1037/Xlm0000124  0.446
2015 Gunseli E, van Moorselaar D, Meeter M, Olivers CN. The reliability of retro-cues determines the fate of noncued visual working memory representations. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. PMID 25563713 DOI: 10.3758/S13423-014-0796-X  0.817
2015 van Moorselaar D, Battistoni E, Theeuwes J, Olivers CN. Rapid influences of cued visual memories on attentional guidance. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 1339: 1-10. PMID 25428708 DOI: 10.1111/Nyas.12574  0.602
2015 Olivers CN. On the role of working memory in visual attention Journal of Vision. 15: 1403. DOI: 10.1167/15.12.1403  0.574
2015 De Groot F, Huettig F, Olivers CNL. When Meaning Matters: The Temporal Dynamics of Semantic Influences on Visual Attention Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. DOI: 10.1037/xhp0000102  0.33
2014 Wilschut A, Theeuwes J, Olivers CN. Nonspecific competition underlies transient attention. Psychological Research. PMID 25187215 DOI: 10.1007/S00426-014-0605-1  0.343
2014 Olivers CN, Schreij D. Visual memory performance for color depends on spatiotemporal context. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics. 76: 1873-84. PMID 25073612 DOI: 10.3758/S13414-014-0741-0  0.493
2014 Gunseli E, Meeter M, Olivers CN. Is a search template an ordinary working memory? Comparing electrophysiological markers of working memory maintenance for visual search and recognition. Neuropsychologia. 60: 29-38. PMID 24878275 DOI: 10.1016/J.Neuropsychologia.2014.05.012  0.848
2014 van Moorselaar D, Theeuwes J, Olivers CN. In competition for the attentional template: can multiple items within visual working memory guide attention? Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance. 40: 1450-64. PMID 24730738 DOI: 10.1037/A0036229  0.593
2014 Gunseli E, Olivers CN, Meeter M. Effects of search difficulty on the selection, maintenance, and learning of attentional templates. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 26: 2042-54. PMID 24666133 DOI: 10.1162/Jocn_A_00600  0.834
2014 Wilschut A, Theeuwes J, Olivers CN. Priming and the guidance by visual and categorical templates in visual search. Frontiers in Psychology. 5: 148. PMID 24605105 DOI: 10.3389/Fpsyg.2014.00148  0.502
2014 Meeter M, Olivers CN. Target features and target-distractor relation are both primed in visual search. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics. 76: 682-94. PMID 24415176 DOI: 10.3758/S13414-013-0611-1  0.626
2014 Hulleman J, Olivers CN. Search through complex motion displays does not break down under spatial memory load. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 21: 652-8. PMID 24146333 DOI: 10.3758/s13423-013-0537-6  0.495
2014 Gunseli E, Olivers CNL, Meeter M. The handoff of the attentional template from working memory after repeated search: The effects of task difficulty Journal of Vision. 14: 712-712. DOI: 10.1167/14.10.712  0.829
2014 Olivers C, van Moorselaar D, Theeuwes J. In competition for the attentional template: Only a single item in visual working memory can guide attention Journal of Vision. 14: 386-386. DOI: 10.1167/14.10.386  0.578
2014 Olivers CNL, Huettig F, Singh JP, Mishra RK. The influence of literacy on visual search Visual Cognition. 22: 74-101. DOI: 10.1080/13506285.2013.875498  0.372
2013 Wilschut A, Theeuwes J, Olivers CN. Early perceptual interactions shape the time course of cueing. Acta Psychologica. 144: 40-50. PMID 23743344 DOI: 10.1016/J.Actpsy.2013.04.020  0.362
2013 Bowman H, Filetti M, Wyble B, Olivers C. Attention is more than prediction precision. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 36: 206-8. PMID 23663435 DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X12002324  0.317
2013 Wilschut A, Theeuwes J, Olivers CN. The time it takes to turn a memory into a template. Journal of Vision. 13. PMID 23603144 DOI: 10.1167/13.3.8  0.605
2013 Dux PE, Roseboom W, Olivers CN. Attentional tuning resets after failures of perceptual awareness. Plos One. 8: e60623. PMID 23565262 DOI: 10.1371/Journal.Pone.0060623  0.369
2013 Van der Burg E, Awh E, Olivers CN. The capacity of audiovisual integration is limited to one item. Psychological Science. 24: 345-51. PMID 23389426 DOI: 10.1177/0956797612452865  0.647
2013 Van der Burg E, Nieuwenstein MR, Theeuwes J, Olivers CN. Irrelevant auditory and visual events induce a visual attentional blink. Experimental Psychology. 60: 80-9. PMID 23047915 DOI: 10.1027/1618-3169/A000174  0.447
2013 Schreij D, Olivers CN. Spatiotemporal object history affects the selection of task-relevant properties. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance. 39: 216-32. PMID 22390295 DOI: 10.1037/A0027187  0.427
2013 Schreij D, Olivers CN. The role of space and time in object-based visual search Visual Cognition. 21: 306-329. DOI: 10.1080/13506285.2013.789092  0.393
2012 Van der Burg E, Olivers CN, Theeuwes J. The attentional window modulates capture by audiovisual events. Plos One. 7: e39137. PMID 22808027 DOI: 10.1371/Journal.Pone.0039137  0.421
2012 Hilkenmeier F, Olivers CN, Scharlau I. Prior entry and temporal attention: cueing affects order errors in RSVP. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance. 38: 180-90. PMID 22082215 DOI: 10.1037/a0025978  0.356
2012 Olivers CNL, Meeter M. Current versus past ambiguity in intertrial priming Visual Cognition. 20: 627-646. DOI: 10.1080/13506285.2012.671791  0.581
2011 Huettig F, Mishra RK, Olivers CN. Mechanisms and representations of language-mediated visual attention. Frontiers in Psychology. 2: 394. PMID 22291672 DOI: 10.3389/Fpsyg.2011.00394  0.428
2011 Wilschut A, Theeuwes J, Olivers CN. The time course of attention: selection is transient. Plos One. 6: e27661. PMID 22125619 DOI: 10.1371/Journal.Pone.0027661  0.373
2011 Olivers CN, Peters J, Houtkamp R, Roelfsema PR. Different states in visual working memory: when it guides attention and when it does not. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 15: 327-34. PMID 21665518 DOI: 10.1016/J.Tics.2011.05.004  0.567
2011 Hartsuiker RJ, Huettig F, Olivers CN. Visual search and visual world: interactions among visual attention, language, and working memory (introduction to the special issue). Acta Psychologica. 137: 135-7. PMID 21296308 DOI: 10.1016/J.Actpsy.2011.01.005  0.486
2011 Van der Burg E, Talsma D, Olivers CN, Hickey C, Theeuwes J. Early multisensory interactions affect the competition among multiple visual objects. Neuroimage. 55: 1208-18. PMID 21195781 DOI: 10.1016/J.Neuroimage.2010.12.068  0.303
2011 Olivers CN, Eimer M. On the difference between working memory and attentional set. Neuropsychologia. 49: 1553-8. PMID 21145332 DOI: 10.1016/J.Neuropsychologia.2010.11.033  0.628
2011 Olivers CN, Hulleman J, Spalek T, Kawahara J, Di Lollo V. The sparing is far from spurious: reevaluating within-trial contingency effects in the attentional blink. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance. 37: 396-408. PMID 20822301 DOI: 10.1037/A0020379  0.304
2011 Huettig F, Olivers CN, Hartsuiker RJ. Looking, language, and memory: bridging research from the visual world and visual search paradigms. Acta Psychologica. 137: 138-50. PMID 20817134 DOI: 10.1016/J.Actpsy.2010.07.013  0.479
2011 Olivers CN. Long-term visual associations affect attentional guidance. Acta Psychologica. 137: 243-7. PMID 20673859 DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.07.001  0.501
2011 Schreij D, Olivers C. Objects approaching your avatar engage attention Journal of Vision. 11: 91-91. DOI: 10.1167/11.11.91  0.348
2010 Theeuwes J, Olivers CN, Belopolsky A. Stimulus-driven capture and contingent capture. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews. Cognitive Science. 1: 872-81. PMID 26271783 DOI: 10.1002/Wcs.83  0.321
2010 Dombrowe IC, Olivers CN, Donk M. The time course of color- and luminance-based salience effects. Frontiers in Psychology. 1: 189. PMID 21833249 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00189  0.363
2010 Schreij D, Theeuwes J, Olivers CN. Irrelevant onsets cause inhibition of return regardless of attentional set. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics. 72: 1725-9. PMID 20952771 DOI: 10.3758/App.72.7.1725  0.34
2010 Van der Burg E, Cass J, Olivers CN, Theeuwes J, Alais D. Efficient visual search from synchronized auditory signals requires transient audiovisual events. Plos One. 5: e10664. PMID 20498844 DOI: 10.1167/10.7.855  0.308
2010 Schreij D, Theeuwes J, Olivers CN. Abrupt onsets capture attention independent of top-down control settings II: additivity is no evidence for filtering. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics. 72: 672-82. PMID 20348574 DOI: 10.3758/App.72.3.672  0.308
2010 Van der Burg E, Brederoo SG, Nieuwenstein MR, Theeuwes J, Olivers CN. Audiovisual semantic interference and attention: evidence from the attentional blink paradigm. Acta Psychologica. 134: 198-205. PMID 20176341 DOI: 10.1016/J.Actpsy.2010.01.010  0.37
2010 Olivers CN, Hickey C. Priming resolves perceptual ambiguity in visual search: evidence from behaviour and electrophysiology. Vision Research. 50: 1362-71. PMID 19962396 DOI: 10.1016/J.Visres.2009.11.022  0.334
2010 Olivers C, Van der Burg E, Talsma D, Bronkhorst A, Theeuwes J. Sound increases visual saliency: Evidence from EEG Journal of Vision. 9: 84-84. DOI: 10.1167/9.8.84  0.399
2010 Olivers C. What drives memory-driven attentional capture? Journal of Vision. 8: 1116-1116. DOI: 10.1167/8.6.1116  0.585
2010 Olivers C, Hilkenmeier F, Meeter M, Scharlau I. Boosting back to the future: Explaining order reversals in the attentional blink Journal of Vision. 10: 199-199. DOI: 10.1167/10.7.199  0.618
2010 Dombrowe I, Olivers CNL, Donk M. The time course of working memory effects on visual attention Visual Cognition. 18: 1089-1112. DOI: 10.1080/13506281003651146  0.613
2009 Olivers CN. What drives memory-driven attentional capture? The effects of memory type, display type, and search type. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance. 35: 1275-91. PMID 19803636 DOI: 10.1037/a0013896  0.602
2009 Schreij D, Olivers CN. Object representations maintain attentional control settings across space and time. Cognition. 113: 111-6. PMID 19682674 DOI: 10.1167/11.11.141  0.425
2009 Theeuwes J, Belopolsky A, Olivers CN. Interactions between working memory, attention and eye movements. Acta Psychologica. 132: 106-14. PMID 19233340 DOI: 10.1016/J.Actpsy.2009.01.005  0.504
2009 Van der Burg E, Olivers CN, Bronkhorst AW, Theeuwes J. Poke and pop: tactile-visual synchrony increases visual saliency. Neuroscience Letters. 450: 60-4. PMID 19013216 DOI: 10.1016/J.Neulet.2008.11.002  0.384
2008 Olivers CN, Meeter M. A boost and bounce theory of temporal attention. Psychological Review. 115: 836-63. PMID 18954206 DOI: 10.1037/A0013395  0.709
2008 Van der Burg E, Olivers CN, Bronkhorst AW, Theeuwes J. Audiovisual events capture attention: evidence from temporal order judgments. Journal of Vision. 8: 2.1-10. PMID 18842073 DOI: 10.1167/8.5.2  0.35
2008 Van der Burg E, Olivers CN, Bronkhorst AW, Theeuwes J. Pip and pop: nonspatial auditory signals improve spatial visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance. 34: 1053-65. PMID 18823194 DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.34.5.1053  0.394
2008 Nieuwenhuis S, Jepma M, La Fors S, Olivers CN. The role of the magnocellular and parvocellular pathways in the attentional blink. Brain and Cognition. 68: 42-8. PMID 18359543 DOI: 10.1016/J.Bandc.2008.02.119  0.389
2008 Olivers CN. Interactions between visual working memory and visual attention. Frontiers in Bioscience : a Journal and Virtual Library. 13: 1182-91. PMID 17981622  0.581
2008 Olivers CNL, Watson DG. Subitizing requires attention Visual Cognition. 16: 439-462. DOI: 10.1080/13506280701825861  0.314
2008 Pinto Y, Olivers CNL, Theeuwes J. Static items are automatically prioritized in a dynamic environment Visual Cognition. 16: 916-932. DOI: 10.1080/13506280701575375  0.367
2008 Olivers CNL, Meeter M. Feature priming in visual search does not depend on the dimensional context Visual Cognition. 16: 785-803. DOI: 10.1080/13506280701428658  0.609
2007 Van der Burg E, Olivers CN, Bronkhorst AW, Koelewijn T, Theeuwes J. The absence of an auditory-visual attentional blink is not due to echoic memory. Perception & Psychophysics. 69: 1230-41. PMID 18038959 DOI: 10.3758/Bf03193958  0.498
2007 Olivers CN, van der Stigchel S, Hulleman J. Spreading the sparing: against a limited-capacity account of the attentional blink. Psychological Research. 71: 126-39. PMID 16341546 DOI: 10.1007/s00426-005-0029-z  0.442
2006 Theeuwes J, Van der Stigchel S, Olivers CN. Spatial working memory and inhibition of return. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 13: 608-13. PMID 17201359 DOI: 10.3758/Bf03193970  0.364
2006 Olivers CN, Meijer F, Theeuwes J. Feature-based memory-driven attentional capture: visual working memory content affects visual attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance. 32: 1243-65. PMID 17002535 DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.32.5.1243  0.62
2006 Olivers CN, Watson DG. Input control processes in rapid serial visual presentations: target selection and distractor inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance. 32: 1083-92. PMID 17002523 DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.32.5.1083  0.359
2006 Olivers CN, Nieuwenhuis S. The beneficial effects of additional task load, positive affect, and instruction on the attentional blink. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance. 32: 364-79. PMID 16634676 DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.32.2.364  0.427
2006 Pinto Y, Olivers CN, Theeuwes J. When is search for a static target among dynamic distractors efficient? Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance. 32: 59-72. PMID 16478326 DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.32.1.59  0.347
2006 Humphreys GW, Olivers CN, Yoon EY. An onset advantage without a preview benefit: neuropsychological evidence separating onset and preview effects in search. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 18: 110-20. PMID 16417687 DOI: 10.1162/089892906775250076  0.384
2006 Olivers CNL, Meeter M. On the dissociation between compound and present/absent tasks in visual search: Intertrial priming is ambiguity driven Visual Cognition. 13: 1-28. DOI: 10.1080/13506280500308101  0.62
2006 Meeter M, Olivers CNL. Intertrial priming stemming from ambiguity: A new account of priming in visual search Visual Cognition. 13: 202-222. DOI: 10.1080/13506280500277488  0.663
2006 Olivers CNL, Humphreys GW, Braithwaite JJ. The preview search task: Evidence for visual marking Visual Cognition. 14: 716-735. DOI: 10.1080/13506280500194188  0.42
2005 Olivers CN, Nieuwenhuis S. The beneficial effect of concurrent task-irrelevant mental activity on temporal attention. Psychological Science. 16: 265-9. PMID 15828972 DOI: 10.1111/J.0956-7976.2005.01526.X  0.405
2005 Theeuwes J, Olivers CN, Chizk CL. Remembering a location makes the eyes curve away. Psychological Science. 16: 196-9. PMID 15733199 DOI: 10.1111/J.0956-7976.2005.00803.X  0.356
2005 Olivers CN, Smith S, Matthews P, Humphreys GW. Prioritizing new over old: an fMRI study of the preview search task. Human Brain Mapping. 24: 69-78. PMID 15390216 DOI: 10.1002/Hbm.20071  0.353
2004 Olivers CN, Humphreys GW. Spatiotemporal segregation in visual search: evidence from parietal lesions. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance. 30: 667-88. PMID 15301617 DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.30.4.667  0.417
2004 Olivers CN, Olivers CN. Blink and shrink: the effect of the attentional blink on spatial processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance. 30: 613-31. PMID 15161390 DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.30.3.613  0.456
2004 Mason OJ, Booth H, Olivers C. Proneness to psychosis and selection of objects of visual attention: individual differences in visual marking Personality and Individual Differences. 36: 1771-1779. DOI: 10.1016/J.Paid.2003.07.015  0.47
2003 Olivers CN, Humphreys GW. Visual marking inhibits singleton capture. Cognitive Psychology. 47: 1-42. PMID 12852934  0.4
2003 Olivers CN, Humphreys GW. Attentional guidance by salient feature singletons depends on intertrial contingencies. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance. 29: 650-7. PMID 12848331  0.303
2003 Watson DG, Humphreys GW, Olivers CN. Visual marking: using time in visual selection. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 7: 180-186. PMID 12691767  0.337
2003 Pollmann S, Weidner R, Humphreys GW, Olivers CN, Müller K, Lohmann G, Wiggins CJ, Watson DG. Separating distractor rejection and target detection in posterior parietal cortex--an event-related fMRI study of visual marking. Neuroimage. 18: 310-23. PMID 12595185 DOI: 10.1016/S1053-8119(02)00036-8  0.332
2002 Olivers CN, Humphreys GW, Heinke D, Cooper AC. Prioritization in visual search: visual marking is not dependent on a mnemonic search. Perception & Psychophysics. 64: 540-60. PMID 12132757  0.466
2002 Olivers CNL, Humphreys GW. When visual marking meets the attentional blink: More evidence for top-down, limited-capacity inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 28: 22-42. DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.28.1.22  0.383
2001 Olivers C, Smith S, Matthews P, Humphreys G. The brain areas underlying visual marking: An event-related fMRI study Neuroimage. 13: 341. DOI: 10.1016/S1053-8119(01)91684-2  0.34
1999 Olivers C, Heinke D, Humphreys G, Müller H. Close interactions between “When” and “Where” in saccade target selection: Multiple saliency and distractor effects Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 22: 693-694. DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X99422150  0.36
1998 Olivers CN, van der Helm PA. Symmetry and selective attention: a dissociation between effortless perception and serial search. Perception & Psychophysics. 60: 1101-16. PMID 9821773 DOI: 10.3758/BF03206161  0.346
Show low-probability matches.