cached image

Mark A. Georgeson - Publications

Affiliations: 
Aston University, Birmingham, England, United Kingdom 
Area:
Psychophysics, Spatial Vision, Motion, Binocular Vision
Website:
http://www1.aston.ac.uk/lhs/staff/az-index/georgema/

115 high-probability publications. We are testing a new system for linking publications to authors. You can help! If you notice any inaccuracies, please sign in and mark papers as correct or incorrect matches. If you identify any major omissions or other inaccuracies in the publication list, please let us know.

Year Citation  Score
2019 Kingdom FAA, Seulami NM, Jennings BJ, Georgeson MA. Interocular difference thresholds are mediated by binocular differencing, not summing, channels. Journal of Vision. 19: 18. PMID 31858103 DOI: 10.1167/19.14.18  0.425
2019 Georgeson MA, Mather G. A motion aftereffect induced without motion: spatial, temporal and binocular properties, and a computational model Journal of Vision. 19: 164c. DOI: 10.1167/19.10.164c  0.322
2018 Baker DH, Lygo FA, Meese TS, Georgeson MA. Binocular summation revisited: Beyond √2. Psychological Bulletin. PMID 30102058 DOI: 10.1037/bul0000163  0.8
2018 Kingdom FAA, Jennings BJ, Georgeson MA. Adaptation to interocular difference. Journal of Vision. 18: 9. PMID 29904784 DOI: 10.1167/18.5.9  0.441
2018 Kilpeläinen M, Georgeson MA. Luminance gradient at object borders communicates object location to the human oculomotor system. Scientific Reports. 8: 1593. PMID 29371609 DOI: 10.1038/S41598-018-19464-1  0.402
2017 Maehara G, Hess RF, Georgeson MA. Direction discrimination thresholds in binocular, monocular, and dichoptic viewing: Motion opponency and contrast gain control. Journal of Vision. 17: 7. PMID 28114489 DOI: 10.1167/17.1.7  0.589
2016 Georgeson MA, Schofield AJ. Binocular functional architecture for detection of contrast-modulated gratings. Vision Research. PMID 27664349 DOI: 10.1016/J.Visres.2016.09.005  0.621
2016 Georgeson M, Wallis S, Meese T, Baker D. Contrast and Lustre: a model that accounts for eleven different forms of contrast discrimination in binocular vision. Vision Research. PMID 27576193 DOI: 10.1016/J.Visres.2016.08.001  0.796
2014 Zhou J, Georgeson MA, Hess RF. Linear binocular combination of responses to contrast modulation: contrast-weighted summation in first- and second-order vision. Journal of Vision. 14: 24. PMID 25424859 DOI: 10.1167/14.13.24  0.578
2014 Georgeson MA, Wallis SA. Binocular fusion, suppression and diplopia for blurred edges. Ophthalmic & Physiological Optics : the Journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists). 34: 163-85. PMID 24476421 DOI: 10.1111/Opo.12108  0.806
2013 Baker DH, Meese TS, Georgeson MA. Paradoxical psychometric functions ("swan functions") are explained by dilution masking in four stimulus dimensions. I-Perception. 4: 17-35. PMID 23799185 DOI: 10.1068/i0552  0.814
2013 Wallis SA, Baker DH, Meese TS, Georgeson MA. The slope of the psychometric function and non-stationarity of thresholds in spatiotemporal contrast vision. Vision Research. 76: 1-10. PMID 23041562 DOI: 10.1016/J.Visres.2012.09.019  0.766
2012 Wallis SA, Georgeson MA. Mach bands and multiscale models of spatial vision: the role of first, second, and third derivative operators in encoding bars and edges. Journal of Vision. 12: 18. PMID 23262150 DOI: 10.1167/12.13.18  0.784
2012 Baker DH, Wallis SA, Georgeson MA, Meese TS. The effect of interocular phase difference on perceived contrast. Plos One. 7: e34696. PMID 22485185 DOI: 10.1371/Journal.Pone.0034696  0.782
2012 Baker DH, Wallis SA, Georgeson MA, Meese TS. Nonlinearities in the binocular combination of luminance and contrast. Vision Research. 56: 1-9. PMID 22289645 DOI: 10.1016/J.Visres.2012.01.008  0.777
2012 Wallis S, Georgeson M. What is binocular fusion? Multiplicative combination of luminance gradients via the geometric mean F1000research. 12: 47-47. DOI: 10.7490/F1000Research.1090589.1  0.778
2012 Georgeson M, Wallis S. Mach bands and models of spatial vision: the role of 1st, 2nd and 3rd derivative operators in encoding edges and bars Journal of Vision. 12: 319-319. DOI: 10.1167/12.9.319  0.773
2012 Georgeson M. Sensory, perceptual and response biases: the criterion concept in perception Journal of Vision. 12: 1392-1392. DOI: 10.1167/12.9.1392  0.312
2012 Meese TS, Baker DH, Summers RJ, Georgeson MA. Contrast integration and counter suppression: a general scheme for visual hierarchies? Journal of Vision. 12: 33-33. DOI: 10.1167/12.14.33  0.776
2012 Wallis S, Georgeson M. Binocular fusion, suppression and diplopia: effects of disparity, contrast polarity and contrast imbalance Perception. 41: 16-16. DOI: 10.1068/V120215  0.797
2012 Wallis S, Georgeson M. What is Binocular Fusion? I-Perception. 3: 220-220. DOI: 10.1068/Id220  0.791
2011 Schofield AJ, Rock PB, Georgeson MA. Sun and sky: Does human vision assume a mixture of point and diffuse illumination when interpreting shape-from-shading? Vision Research. 51: 2317-30. PMID 21945645 DOI: 10.1016/J.Visres.2011.09.004  0.527
2011 Elliott SL, Georgeson MA, Webster MA. Response normalization and blur adaptation: data and multi-scale model. Journal of Vision. 11. PMID 21307174 DOI: 10.1167/11.2.7  0.388
2011 Georgeson M, Schofield A. Binocular functional architecture for detection of luminance- and contrast-modulated gratings Journal of Vision. 11: 305-305. DOI: 10.1167/11.11.305  0.357
2010 Schofield AJ, Rock PB, Sun P, Jiang X, Georgeson MA. What is second-order vision for? Discriminating illumination versus material changes. Journal of Vision. 10: 2. PMID 20884600 DOI: 10.1167/10.9.2  0.639
2010 Mandegary S, Webster M, Georgeson M. Spatial and temporal integration in blur adaptation Journal of Vision. 9: 975-975. DOI: 10.1167/9.8.975  0.32
2010 Schofield A, Rock P, Sun P, Georgeson M. The role of second-order vision in discriminating shading versus material changes Journal of Vision. 9: 58-58. DOI: 10.1167/9.8.58  0.561
2010 Georgeson M, Wallis S. Seeing light vs dark lines: psychophysical performance is based on separate channels, limited by noise and uncertainty Journal of Vision. 8: 821-821. DOI: 10.1167/8.6.821  0.756
2010 Schofield AJ, Rock PB, Hesse G, Georgeson MA, Yates TA. The role of texture amplitude in shape from shading Journal of Vision. 6: 258-258. DOI: 10.1167/6.6.258  0.362
2010 Georgeson MA. Bars & Edges: A multi-scale Gaussian derivative model for feature coding in human vision Journal of Vision. 6: 191-191. DOI: 10.1167/6.6.191  0.303
2010 Schofield AJ, Hesse GS, Georgeson MA. Texture amplitude is a cue to perception of shape from shading Journal of Vision. 5: 523-523. DOI: 10.1167/5.8.523  0.314
2010 Georgeson M, Meese T, Baker D. Detecting contrast differences in binocular and dichoptic vision: we use monocular or binocular channels, whichever gives the MAX response Journal of Vision. 10: 350-350. DOI: 10.1167/10.7.350  0.794
2010 May KA, Georgeson MA. Corrigendum to “Blurred edges look faint, and faint edges look sharp: The effect of a gradient threshold in a multi-scale edge coding model” [Vision Res. 47(13) (2007) 1705–1720] Vision Research. 50: 996. DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2010.02.018  0.624
2009 Wallis SA, Georgeson MA. Mach edges: local features predicted by 3rd derivative spatial filtering. Vision Research. 49: 1886-93. PMID 19426750 DOI: 10.1016/J.Visres.2009.04.026  0.798
2009 Georgeson MA, Yates TA, Schofield AJ. Depth propagation and surface construction in 3-D vision. Vision Research. 49: 84-95. PMID 18977239 DOI: 10.1016/J.Visres.2008.09.030  0.548
2008 Georgeson MA, Yates TA, Schofield AJ. Discriminating depth in corrugated stereo surfaces: facilitation by a pedestal is explained by removal of uncertainty. Vision Research. 48: 2321-8. PMID 18682260 DOI: 10.1016/J.Visres.2008.07.009  0.611
2007 Georgeson MA, May KA, Freeman TC, Hesse GS. From filters to features: scale-space analysis of edge and blur coding in human vision. Journal of Vision. 7: 7.1-21. PMID 17997635 DOI: 10.1167/7.13.7  0.687
2007 Baker DH, Meese TS, Georgeson MA. Binocular interaction: contrast matching and contrast discrimination are predicted by the same model. Spatial Vision. 20: 397-413. PMID 17716525 DOI: 10.1163/156856807781503622  0.824
2007 May KA, Georgeson MA. Added luminance ramp alters perceived edge blur and contrast: a critical test for derivative-based models of edge coding. Vision Research. 47: 1721-31. PMID 17467769 DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2007.02.018  0.681
2007 May KA, Georgeson MA. Blurred edges look faint, and faint edges look sharp: the effect of a gradient threshold in a multi-scale edge coding model. Vision Research. 47: 1705-20. PMID 17442367 DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2007.02.012  0.67
2006 Meese TS, Georgeson MA, Baker DH. Binocular contrast vision at and above threshold. Journal of Vision. 6: 1224-43. PMID 17209731 DOI: 10.1167/6.11.7  0.824
2006 Schofield AJ, Hesse G, Rock PB, Georgeson MA. Local luminance amplitude modulates the interpretation of shape-from-shading in textured surfaces. Vision Research. 46: 3462-82. PMID 16650882 DOI: 10.1016/J.Visres.2006.03.014  0.55
2006 Georgeson MA, Meese TS. Fixed or variable noise in contrast discrimination? The jury's still out... Vision Research. 46: 4294-303. PMID 16225900 DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2005.08.024  0.77
2005 Hesse GS, Georgeson MA. Edges and bars: where do people see features in 1-D images? Vision Research. 45: 507-25. PMID 15610754 DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2004.09.013  0.428
2005 Georgeson MA, Meese TS, Baker DH. Binocular summation, dichoptic masking and contrast gain control Journal of Vision. 5: 797-797. DOI: 10.1167/5.8.797  0.79
2005 Meese TS, Georgeson MA, Baker DH. Interocular masking and summation indicate two stages of divisive contrast gain control Perception. 34: 0-0. DOI: 10.1068/V050255  0.816
2005 Schofield AJ, Hesse G, Georgeson MA, Rock PB. The role of texture in shape from shading: are humans biased towards seeing relief textures? Perception. 34: 0-0. DOI: 10.1068/V050142  0.372
2004 Georgeson M. Visual aftereffects: Cortical neurons change their tune Current Biology. 14: R751-R753. PMID 15380084 DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2004.09.011  0.373
2004 Cooper ACG, Humphreys GW, Hulleman J, Praamstra P, Georgeson M. Transcranial magnetic stimulation to right parietal cortex modifies the attentional blink Experimental Brain Research. 155: 24-29. PMID 15064881 DOI: 10.1007/S00221-003-1697-9  0.307
2004 Barbieri-Hesse GS, Schofield AJ, Georgeson MA. The interaction of luminance and texture amplitude in surface depth perception Perception. 33: 0-0. DOI: 10.1068/V040078  0.354
2003 Hammett ST, Georgeson MA, Barbieri-Hesse GS. Motion, flash, and flicker: a unified spatiotemporal model of perceived edge sharpening. Perception. 32: 1221-32. PMID 14700257 DOI: 10.1068/p3400  0.398
2003 Hammett ST, Georgeson MA, Bedingham S, Barbieri-Hesse GS. Motion sharpening and contrast: gain control precedes compressive non-linearity? Vision Research. 43: 1187-99. PMID 12705958 DOI: 10.1016/S0042-6989(03)00071-3  0.392
2003 Schofield AJ, Georgeson MA. Sensitivity to contrast modulation: the spatial frequency dependence of second-order vision. Vision Research. 43: 243-59. PMID 12535984 DOI: 10.1016/S0042-6989(02)00542-4  0.541
2003 Georgeson MA, May KA, Barbieri-Hesse GS. Perceiving edge blur: The Gaussian-derivative template model Journal of Vision. 3: 360a. DOI: 10.1167/3.9.360  0.641
2003 Georgeson MA, Barbieri-Hesse GS. Bars and edges: What makes a feature for human vision? Perception. 32: 0-0. DOI: 10.1068/V030823  0.38
2002 Georgeson MA, Schofield AJ. Shading and texture: separate information channels with a common adaptation mechanism? Spatial Vision. 16: 59-76. PMID 12636225 DOI: 10.1163/15685680260433913  0.549
2002 Webster MA, Georgeson MA, Webster SM. Neural adjustments to image blur. Nature Neuroscience. 5: 839-40. PMID 12195427 DOI: 10.1038/nn906  0.319
2002 Georgeson MA, Hammett ST. Seeing blur: 'motion sharpening' without motion. Proceedings. Biological Sciences / the Royal Society. 269: 1429-34. PMID 12137571 DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2002.2029  0.384
2001 Georgeson MA. Seeing edge blur: Receptive fields as multi-scale neural templates Journal of Vision. 1: 438a. DOI: 10.1167/1.3.438  0.445
2000 Schofield AJ, Georgeson MA. The temporal properties of first- and second-order vision. Vision Research. 40: 2475-87. PMID 10915887 DOI: 10.1016/S0042-6989(00)00111-5  0.576
2000 Georgeson MA, Scott-Samuel NE. Spatial resolution and receptive field height of motion sensors in human vision. Vision Research. 40: 745-58. PMID 10683453 DOI: 10.1016/S0042-6989(99)00219-9  0.688
1999 Georgeson MA, Scott-Samuel NE. Motion contrast: a new metric for direction discrimination. Vision Research. 39: 4393-402. PMID 10789432 DOI: 10.1016/S0042-6989(99)00147-9  0.664
1999 Georgeson MA, Meese TS. Adaptive filtering in spatial vision: evidence from feature marking in plaids. Perception. 28: 687-702. PMID 10664764 DOI: 10.1068/P2836  0.768
1999 Scott-Samuel NE, Georgeson MA. Feature matching and segmentation in motion perception. Proceedings. Biological Sciences / the Royal Society. 266: 2289-94. PMID 10629979 DOI: 10.1098/rspb.1999.0921  0.663
1999 Schofield AJ, Georgeson MA. Sensitivity to modulations of luminance and contrast in visual white noise: separate mechanisms with similar behaviour. Vision Research. 39: 2697-716. PMID 10492831 DOI: 10.1016/S0042-6989(98)00284-3  0.597
1999 Scott-Samuel NE, Georgeson MA. Does early non-linearity account for second-order motion? Vision Research. 39: 2853-65. PMID 10492815 DOI: 10.1016/S0042-6989(98)00316-2  0.667
1998 Hammett ST, Georgeson MA, Gorea A. Motion blur and motion sharpening: temporal smear and local contrast non-linearity. Vision Research. 38: 2099-108. PMID 9797970 DOI: 10.1016/S0042-6989(97)00430-6  0.64
1998 Georgeson MA. Edge-finding in human vision: A multi-stage model based on the perceived structure of plaids Image and Vision Computing. 16: 389-405. DOI: 10.1016/S0262-8856(97)00081-4  0.413
1997 Georgeson MA, Meese TS. Perception of stationary plaids: the role of spatial filters in edge analysis. Vision Research. 37: 3255-71. PMID 9425542 DOI: 10.1016/S0042-6989(97)00124-7  0.765
1997 Georgeson MA, Freeman TC. Perceived location of bars and edges in one-dimensional images: computational models and human vision. Vision Research. 37: 127-42. PMID 9068835 DOI: 10.1016/S0042-6989(96)00078-8  0.372
1997 Scott-Samuel NE, Georgeson MA. Breaking up is never easy: Feature matching in motion perception Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 38: S379.  0.597
1997 Hammett ST, Georgeson MA, Gorea A. Motion sharpening and BLUR Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 38: S377.  0.504
1996 Georgeson MA, Freeman TC, Scott-Samuel NE. Sub-pixel accuracy: psychophysical validation of an algorithm for fine positioning and movement of dots on visual displays. Vision Research. 36: 605-12. PMID 8855004 DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(96)89253-4  0.671
1996 Meese TS, Georgeson MA. Spatial filter combination in human pattern vision: channel interactions revealed by adaptation. Perception. 25: 255-77. PMID 8804088 DOI: 10.1068/P250255  0.773
1996 Meese TS, Georgeson MA. The tilt aftereffect in plaids and gratings: channel codes, local signs and "patchwise" transforms. Vision Research. 36: 1421-37. PMID 8762761 DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(95)00212-X  0.772
1996 Georgeson MA, Meese TS. Perceived structure of plaids implies variable combination of oriented filters in edge finding Proceedings of Spie - the International Society For Optical Engineering. 2657: 175-189. DOI: 10.1117/12.238714  0.769
1994 Georgeson MA, Shackleton TM. Perceived contrast of gratings and plaids: non-linear summation across oriented filters. Vision Research. 34: 1061-75. PMID 8160415 DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(94)90010-8  0.447
1992 Georgeson MA. Human vision combines oriented filters to compute edges. Proceedings. Biological Sciences / the Royal Society. 249: 235-45. PMID 1359554 DOI: 10.1098/rspb.1992.0110  0.423
1992 Georgeson M, Swanston MT, Barbur JL. Reviews: Representations of Vision: Trends and Tacit Assumptions in Vision Research, Visual Perception: Physiology, Psychology and Ecology, Night Vision: Basic, Clinical and Applied Aspects Perception. 21: 691-696. DOI: 10.1068/p210691  0.337
1992 Greenlee MW, Georgeson MA, Magnussen S, Harris JP. The decay of adaptation to spatial contrast: a response to david rose Vision Research. 32: 1785-1788. DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(92)90172-F  0.343
1991 Greenlee MW, Georgeson MA, Magnussen S, Harris JP. The time course of adaptation to spatial contrast. Vision Research. 31: 223-36. PMID 2017883 DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(91)90113-J  0.411
1990 Georgeson MA, Harris MG. The temporal range of motion sensing and motion perception. Vision Research. 30: 615-9. PMID 2339514 DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(90)90072-S  0.34
1989 Georgeson MA, Shackleton TM. Monocular motion sensing, binocular motion perception. Vision Research. 29: 1511-23. PMID 2635477 DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(89)90135-1  0.352
1988 Georgeson MA. Spatial phase dependence and the role of motion detection in monocular and dichoptic forward masking. Vision Research. 28: 1193-205. PMID 3253991 DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(88)90036-3  0.418
1988 Swanson WH, Georgeson MA, Wilson HR. Comparison of contrast responses across spatial mechanisms. Vision Research. 28: 457-9. PMID 3188408 DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(88)90187-3  0.374
1987 Georgeson MA. Temporal properties of spatial contrast vision. Vision Research. 27: 765-80. PMID 3660638 DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(87)90074-5  0.446
1987 Georgeson MA, Georgeson JM. Facilitation and masking of briefly presented gratings: time-course and contrast dependence. Vision Research. 27: 369-79. PMID 3660598 DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(87)90086-1  0.449
1986 Harris MG, Georgeson MA. Sustained and transient temporal integration functions depend on spatial frequency, not grating area. Vision Research. 26: 1779-82. PMID 3617519 DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(86)90128-8  0.349
1985 Georgeson MA. The effect of spatial adaptation on perceived contrast. Spatial Vision. 1: 103-12. PMID 3940052 DOI: 10.1163/156856885X00125  0.406
1985 Georgeson MA, Georgeson JM. On seeing temporal gaps between gratings: a criterion problem for measurement of visible persistence. Vision Research. 25: 1729-33. PMID 3832597 DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(85)90145-2  0.345
1985 Georgeson MA. Apparent spatial frequency and contrast of gratings: separate effects of contrast and duration. Vision Research. 25: 1721-7. PMID 3832596 DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(85)90144-0  0.381
1985 Georgeson MA, Turner RS. Afterimages of sinusoidal, square-wave and compound gratings. Vision Research. 25: 1709-20. PMID 3832595 DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(85)90143-9  0.408
1985 Georgeson M, Butterworth G. Reviews: Visual Masking: An Integrative Approach, Visual Order: The Nature and Development of Pictorial Representation Perception. 14: 779-782. DOI: 10.1068/p140779  0.337
1984 Georgeson MA. Eye movements, afterimages and monocular rivalry. Vision Research. 24: 1311-9. PMID 6523751 DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(84)90186-X  0.352
1984 Georgeson MA, Turner RS. Stability of phase recognition in complex spatial waveforms. Vision Research. 24: 851-8. PMID 6474840 DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(84)90157-3  0.351
1984 Georgeson MA, Harris MG. Spatial selectivity of contrast adaptation: models and data. Vision Research. 24: 729-41. PMID 6464366 DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(84)90214-1  0.393
1983 Freeman NH, Georgeson MA, Lishman JR, Harris J, Caelli T, Seymour PHK. Reviews: Spatial Cognition: The Structure and Development of Mental Representations of Spatial Relations, Cambridge Texts in the Physiological Sciences 3. The Senses, Perception: From Sense to Object, Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading, Visual Form Detection in 3-Dimensional Space, Visual Information Processing Perception. 12: 771-777. DOI: 10.1068/P120771  0.358
1981 Georgeson MA, Reddin SK. Adaptation to gratings: equal spatial selectivity for light and dark bar width variation. Vision Research. 21: 419-21. PMID 7269320 DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(81)90170-X  0.363
1980 Georgeson MA. The graph-paper effect: subjective stereoscopic patterns induced by moving gratings. Perception. 9: 503-22. PMID 7443388 DOI: 10.1068/P090503  0.393
1980 Georgeson MA. The perceived spatial frequency, contrast, and orientation of illusory gratings. Perception. 9: 695-712. PMID 7220242 DOI: 10.1068/P090695  0.361
1980 Georgeson MA, Phillips R. Angular selectivity of monocular rivalry: experiment and computer simulation. Vision Research. 20: 1007-13. PMID 7210512 DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(80)90084-X  0.407
1980 Georgeson MA. Spatial frequency analysis in early visual processing. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences. 290: 11-22. PMID 6106232 DOI: 10.1098/Rstb.1980.0079  0.383
1978 Georgeson MA, Harris MG. Apparent foveofugal drift of counterphase gratings. Perception. 7: 527-36. PMID 733443 DOI: 10.1068/P070527  0.41
1978 Rose D, Papakostopoulos D, Georgeson M, Findlay J, Butterworth G. Reviews: Structure of the Human Brain: A Photographic Atlas, Visual Evoked Potentials in Man: New Developments, Spatial Contrast, Sensation and Perception: An Integrated Approach, Psychobiological Aspects of Cognitive Growth Perception. 7: 727-731. DOI: 10.1068/p070727  0.314
1977 Sullivan GD, Georgeson MA. The missing fundamental illusion: variation of spatio-temporal characteristics with dark adaptation. Vision Research. 17: 977-81. PMID 595405 DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(77)90074-8  0.383
1976 Georgeson M. Antagonism between channels for pattern and movement in human vision Nature. 259: 413-415. PMID 1250384 DOI: 10.1038/259413A0  0.372
1976 Georgeson MA. Psychohysical hallucinations of orientation and spatial frequency. Perception. 5: 99-111. PMID 958854 DOI: 10.1068/P050099  0.399
1975 Georgeson MA, Sullivan GD. Contrast constancy: deblurring in human vision by spatial frequency channels. The Journal of Physiology. 252: 627-56. PMID 1206570 DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1975.sp011162  0.449
1974 Georgeson MA. Is texture-density contrast an inhibition or an adaptation? Nature. 249: 85-7. PMID 4833237 DOI: 10.1038/249085A0  0.368
1973 Georgeson MA. Spatial frequency selectivity of a visual tilt illusion. Nature. 245: 43-5. PMID 4583130 DOI: 10.1038/245043A0  0.404
1973 Georgeson MA, Blakemore C. Apparent Depth and the Müller—Lyer Illusion Perception. 2: 225-234. DOI: 10.1068/p020225  0.512
1973 Georgeson MA, Blakemore C. Apparent depth and the Muller Lyer illusion Perception. 2: 225-234.  0.441
1972 Sullivan GD, Georgeson MA, Oatley K. Channels for spatial frequency selection and the detection of single bars by the human visual system. Vision Research. 12: 383-94. PMID 5021905 DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(72)90083-1  0.405
1971 Blakemore C, Carpenter RHS, Georgeson MA. Lateral thinking about lateral inhibition [16] Nature. 234: 418-419. DOI: 10.1038/234418b0  0.485
1970 Blakemore C, Carpenter RH, Georgeson MA. Lateral inhibition between orientation detectors in the human visual system. Nature. 228: 37-9. PMID 5456209 DOI: 10.1038/228037a0  0.553
Show low-probability matches.