Year |
Citation |
Score |
2021 |
Fernández S, Ortells JJ, Kiefer M, Noguera C, De Fockert JW. Working memory capacity modulates expectancy-based strategic processing: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Biological Psychology. 159: 108023. PMID 33460781 DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2021.108023 |
0.355 |
|
2019 |
Job X, Golemme M, Bhattacharya J, Cappelletti M, de Fockert J, van Velzen J. The influence of motor preparation on the processing of action-relevant visual features. Scientific Reports. 9: 11084. PMID 31366985 DOI: 10.1038/S41598-019-47640-4 |
0.331 |
|
2019 |
Job XE, Brady D, de Fockert JW, Luft CDB, Hill EL, van Velzen J. Adults with probable developmental coordination disorder selectively process early visual, but not tactile information during action preparation. An electrophysiological study. Human Movement Science. PMID 30981450 DOI: 10.1016/j.humov.2019.02.018 |
0.301 |
|
2018 |
Ortells JJ, De Fockert JW, Romera N, Fernández S. Expectancy-Based Strategic Processes Are Influenced by Spatial Working Memory Load and Individual Differences in Working Memory Capacity. Frontiers in Psychology. 9: 1239. PMID 30065693 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01239 |
0.444 |
|
2017 |
Job XE, van Velzen J, de Fockert JW. Grasp preparation modulates early visual processing of size and detection of local/global stimulus features. Cortex; a Journal Devoted to the Study of the Nervous System and Behavior. 96: 46-58. PMID 28961525 DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2017.08.034 |
0.306 |
|
2017 |
Noreen S, de Fockert JW. The Role of Cognitive Load in Intentional Forgetting Using the Think/No-Think Task. Experimental Psychology. 64: 14-26. PMID 28219259 DOI: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000347 |
0.447 |
|
2017 |
Ortells JJ, Álvarez D, Noguera C, Carmona E, de Fockert JW. The Influence of Working Memory Load on Expectancy-Based Strategic Processes in the Stroop-Priming Task. Frontiers in Psychology. 8: 129. PMID 28203218 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00129 |
0.452 |
|
2014 |
De Fockert JW, Leiser J. Better target detection in the presence of collinear flankers under high working memory load. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 8: 821. PMID 25352803 DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00821 |
0.469 |
|
2014 |
Holmes A, Mogg K, de Fockert J, Nielsen MK, Bradley BP. Electrophysiological evidence for greater attention to threat when cognitive control resources are depleted. Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience. 14: 827-35. PMID 24165903 DOI: 10.3758/s13415-013-0212-4 |
0.461 |
|
2014 |
Doneva SP, De Fockert JW. More conservative go/no-go response criterion under high working memory load Journal of Cognitive Psychology. 26: 110-117. DOI: 10.1080/20445911.2013.855780 |
0.325 |
|
2013 |
de Fockert JW. Beyond perceptual load and dilution: a review of the role of working memory in selective attention. Frontiers in Psychology. 4: 287. PMID 23734139 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00287 |
0.476 |
|
2013 |
Linnell KJ, Caparos S, de Fockert JW, Davidoff J. Urbanization decreases attentional engagement. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance. 39: 1232-47. PMID 23339348 DOI: 10.1037/a0031139 |
0.38 |
|
2013 |
Caparos S, Linnell KJ, Bremner AJ, de Fockert JW, Davidoff J. Do local and global perceptual biases tell us anything about local and global selective attention? Psychological Science. 24: 206-12. PMID 23300230 DOI: 10.1177/0956797612452569 |
0.308 |
|
2012 |
de Fockert JW, Theeuwes J. Role of frontal cortex in attentional capture by singleton distractors. Brain and Cognition. 80: 367-73. PMID 22959916 DOI: 10.1016/J.Bandc.2012.07.006 |
0.544 |
|
2012 |
Ahmed L, de Fockert JW. Focusing on attention: the effects of working memory capacity and load on selective attention. Plos One. 7: e43101. PMID 22952636 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0043101 |
0.436 |
|
2012 |
Ahmed L, de Fockert JW. Working memory load can both improve and impair selective attention: evidence from the Navon paradigm. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics. 74: 1397-405. PMID 22872549 DOI: 10.3758/s13414-012-0357-1 |
0.466 |
|
2012 |
Murphy S, van Velzen J, de Fockert JW. The role of perceptual load in action affordance by ignored objects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 19: 1122-7. PMID 22806449 DOI: 10.3758/s13423-012-0299-6 |
0.385 |
|
2011 |
de Fockert JW, Caparos S, Linnell KJ, Davidoff J. Reduced distractibility in a remote culture. Plos One. 6: e26337. PMID 22046275 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0026337 |
0.433 |
|
2011 |
de Fockert JW, Bremner AJ. Release of inattentional blindness by high working memory load: elucidating the relationship between working memory and selective attention. Cognition. 121: 400-8. PMID 21937032 DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2011.08.016 |
0.493 |
|
2010 |
de Fockert JW, Mizon GA, D'Ubaldo M. No negative priming without cognitive control. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance. 36: 1333-41. PMID 20854003 DOI: 10.1037/a0020404 |
0.381 |
|
2010 |
de Fockert JW. Early top-down attentional modulation in visual processing. Acta Psychologica. 135: 112-3; discussion 13. PMID 20497897 DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.04.015 |
0.307 |
|
2009 |
Hughes G, Velmans M, De Fockert J. Unconscious priming of a no-go response. Psychophysiology. 46: 1258-69. PMID 19686367 DOI: 10.1111/J.1469-8986.2009.00873.X |
0.555 |
|
2009 |
Bergström ZM, de Fockert JW, Richardson-Klavehn A. ERP and behavioural evidence for direct suppression of unwanted memories. Neuroimage. 48: 726-37. PMID 19563900 DOI: 10.1016/J.Neuroimage.2009.06.051 |
0.357 |
|
2009 |
Bergström ZM, de Fockert J, Richardson-Klavehn A. Event-related potential evidence that automatic recollection can be voluntarily avoided. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 21: 1280-301. PMID 18702575 DOI: 10.1162/Jocn.2009.21075 |
0.389 |
|
2009 |
De Fockert JW, Wu S. High working memory load leads to more Ebbinghaus illusion European Journal of Cognitive Psychology. 21: 961-970. DOI: 10.1080/09541440802689302 |
0.322 |
|
2006 |
Lavie N, de Fockert J. Frontal control of attentional capture in visual search Visual Cognition. 14: 863-876. DOI: 10.1080/13506280500195953 |
0.636 |
|
2005 |
Lavie N, De Fockert J. The role of working memory in attentional capture. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 12: 669-74. PMID 16447380 DOI: 10.3758/Bf03196756 |
0.613 |
|
2005 |
de Fockert JW. Keeping priorities: the role of working memory and selective attention in cognitive aging. Science of Aging Knowledge Environment : Sage Ke. 2005: pe34. PMID 16267341 DOI: 10.1126/sageke.2005.44.pe34 |
0.364 |
|
2004 |
Lavie N, Hirst A, de Fockert JW, Viding E. Load theory of selective attention and cognitive control. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General. 133: 339-54. PMID 15355143 DOI: 10.1037/0096-3445.133.3.339 |
0.59 |
|
2004 |
de Fockert J, Rees G, Frith C, Lavie N. Neural correlates of attentional capture in visual search. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 16: 751-9. PMID 15200703 DOI: 10.1162/089892904970762 |
0.597 |
|
2003 |
Lavie N, de Fockert JW. Contrasting effects of sensory limits and capacity limits in visual selective attention. Perception & Psychophysics. 65: 202-12. PMID 12713239 DOI: 10.3758/Bf03194795 |
0.585 |
|
2001 |
de Fockert JW, Rees G, Frith CD, Lavie N. The role of working memory in visual selective attention. Science (New York, N.Y.). 291: 1803-6. PMID 11230699 DOI: 10.1126/science.1056496 |
0.613 |
|
Show low-probability matches. |