| Year |
Citation |
Score |
| 2022 |
Tu N, Joo S, Lee P, Stark S. Comparison of parameter estimation approaches for multi-unidimensional pairwise preference tests. Behavior Research Methods. PMID 35931936 DOI: 10.3758/s13428-022-01927-z |
0.759 |
|
| 2022 |
Joo SH, Lee P, Stark S. Bayesian Approaches for Detecting Differential Item Functioning Using the Generalized Graded Unfolding Model. Applied Psychological Measurement. 46: 98-115. PMID 35281341 DOI: 10.1177/01466216211066606 |
0.77 |
|
| 2022 |
Joo SH, Lee P, Stark S. The Explanatory Generalized Graded Unfolding Model: Incorporating Collateral Information to Improve the Latent Trait Estimation Accuracy. Applied Psychological Measurement. 46: 3-18. PMID 34898744 DOI: 10.1177/01466216211051717 |
0.779 |
|
| 2021 |
Joo SH, Lee P, Stark S. Modeling Multidimensional Forced Choice Measures with the Zinnes and Griggs Pairwise Preference Item Response Theory Model. Multivariate Behavioral Research. 1-21. PMID 34370564 DOI: 10.1080/00273171.2021.1960142 |
0.769 |
|
| 2021 |
Wang Y, Kim E, Ferron JM, Dedrick RF, Tan TX, Stark S. Testing Measurement Invariance Across Unobserved Groups: The Role of Covariates in Factor Mixture Modeling. Educational and Psychological Measurement. 81: 61-89. PMID 33456062 DOI: 10.1177/0013164420925122 |
0.322 |
|
| 2020 |
Kirkendall CD, Nye CD, Rounds J, Drasgow F, Chernyshenko OS, Stark S. Adaptive vocational interest diagnostic: Informing and improving the job assignment process. Military Psychology : the Official Journal of the Division of Military Psychology, American Psychological Association. 32: 91-100. PMID 38536267 DOI: 10.1080/08995605.2019.1652480 |
0.723 |
|
| 2020 |
Kirkendall CD, Nye CD, Rounds J, Drasgow F, Chernyshenko OS, Stark S. Adaptive vocational interest diagnostic: Informing and improving the job assignment process. Military Psychology : the Official Journal of the Division of Military Psychology, American Psychological Association. 32: 91-100. PMID 38536267 DOI: 10.1080/08995605.2019.1652480 |
0.723 |
|
| 2020 |
Ng V, Lee P, Ho MR, Kuykendall L, Stark S, Tay L. The Development and Validation of a Multidimensional Forced-Choice Format Character Measure: Testing the Thurstonian IRT Approach. Journal of Personality Assessment. 1-14. PMID 32208939 DOI: 10.1080/00223891.2020.1739056 |
0.825 |
|
| 2020 |
Lee P, Joo S, Stark S. Detecting DIF in Multidimensional Forced Choice Measures Using the Thurstonian Item Response Theory Model Organizational Research Methods. 24: 739-771. DOI: 10.1177/1094428120959822 |
0.791 |
|
| 2020 |
Nye CD, White LA, Horgen K, Drasgow F, Stark S, Chernyshenko OS. Predictors of attitudes and performance in U.S. Army recruiters: Does personality matter? Military Psychology. 32: 81-90. DOI: 10.1080/08995605.2019.1652486 |
0.752 |
|
| 2020 |
Nye CD, White LA, Drasgow F, Prasad J, Chernyshenko OS, Stark S. Examining personality for the selection and classification of soldiers: Validity and differential validity across jobs Military Psychology. 32: 60-70. DOI: 10.1080/08995605.2019.1652482 |
0.757 |
|
| 2019 |
Joo SH, Lee P, Stark S. Adaptive testing with the GGUM-RANK multidimensional forced choice model: Comparison of pair, triplet, and tetrad scoring. Behavior Research Methods. PMID 31342469 DOI: 10.3758/s13428-019-01274-6 |
0.792 |
|
| 2019 |
Lee P, Joo SH, Stark S, Chernyshenko OS. GGUM-RANK Statement and Person Parameter Estimation With Multidimensional Forced Choice Triplets. Applied Psychological Measurement. 43: 226-240. PMID 31019358 DOI: 10.1177/0146621618768294 |
0.832 |
|
| 2019 |
Joo SH, Chun S, Stark S, Chernyshenko OS. Item Parameter Estimation With the General Hyperbolic Cosine Ideal Point IRT Model. Applied Psychological Measurement. 43: 18-33. PMID 30573932 DOI: 10.1177/0146621618758697 |
0.314 |
|
| 2019 |
Zhang B, Sun T, Drasgow F, Chernyshenko OS, Nye CD, Stark S, White LA. Though Forced, Still Valid: Psychometric Equivalence of Forced-Choice and Single-Statement Measures Organizational Research Methods. 23: 569-590. DOI: 10.1177/1094428119836486 |
0.774 |
|
| 2019 |
Nye CD, Joo S, Zhang B, Stark S. Advancing and Evaluating IRT Model Data Fit Indices in Organizational Research Organizational Research Methods. 23: 457-486. DOI: 10.1177/1094428119833158 |
0.321 |
|
| 2018 |
Joo S, Lee P, Stark S. Development of Information Functions and Indices for the GGUM-RANK Multidimensional Forced Choice IRT Model Journal of Educational Measurement. 55: 357-372. DOI: 10.1111/JEDM.12183 |
0.716 |
|
| 2018 |
Nye CD, Chernyshenko OS, Stark S, Drasgow F, Phillips HL, Phillips JB, Campbell JS. More than
g
: Evidence for the Incremental Validity of Performance‐Based Assessments for Predicting Training Performance Applied Psychology. 69: 302-324. DOI: 10.1111/Apps.12171 |
0.708 |
|
| 2018 |
Lee P, Lee S, Stark S. Examining validity evidence for multidimensional forced choice measures with different scoring approaches Personality and Individual Differences. 123: 229-235. DOI: 10.1016/J.PAID.2017.11.031 |
0.75 |
|
| 2017 |
Lee P, Joo SH, Stark S. Linking Methods for the Zinnes-Griggs Pairwise Preference IRT Model. Applied Psychological Measurement. 41: 130-144. PMID 29881082 DOI: 10.1177/0146621616675836 |
0.768 |
|
| 2017 |
Joo SH, Lee P, Stark S. Evaluating Anchor-Item Designs for Concurrent Calibration With the GGUM. Applied Psychological Measurement. 41: 83-96. PMID 29881079 DOI: 10.1177/0146621616673997 |
0.771 |
|
| 2016 |
Wang W, Lee P, Joo SH, Stark S, Louden R. MCMC Z-G: An IRT Computer Program for Forced-Choice Noncognitive Measurement. Applied Psychological Measurement. 40: 551-553. PMID 29881069 DOI: 10.1177/0146621616663682 |
0.758 |
|
| 2016 |
Chun S, Stark S, Kim ES, Chernyshenko OS. MIMIC Methods for Detecting DIF Among Multiple Groups: Exploring a New Sequential-Free Baseline Procedure. Applied Psychological Measurement. 40: 486-499. PMID 29881065 DOI: 10.1177/0146621616659738 |
0.665 |
|
| 2016 |
Wang W, Lee P, Joo SH, Stark S, Louden R. MCMC Z-G: An IRT Computer Program for Forced-Choice Noncognitive Measurement Applied Psychological Measurement. 40: 551-553. DOI: 10.1177/0146621616663682 |
0.759 |
|
| 2016 |
Kim ES, Joo SH, Lee P, Wang Y, Stark S. Measurement Invariance Testing Across Between-Level Latent Classes Using Multilevel Factor Mixture Modeling Structural Equation Modeling. 1-18. DOI: 10.1080/10705511.2016.1196108 |
0.743 |
|
| 2015 |
Rojas EC, Hicks BM, Stark S, Hopwood CJ, Bornovalova MA. Elaborating on the construct validity of the Minnesota Borderline Personality Disorder Scale (MBPD): a multi-sample, longitudinal examination. Psychological Assessment. 27: 332-9. PMID 25558963 DOI: 10.1037/Pas0000061 |
0.323 |
|
| 2015 |
Guenole N, Chernyshenko O, Stark S, Drasgow F. Are predictions based on situational judgement tests precise enough for feedback in leadership development? European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology. 24: 433-443. DOI: 10.1080/1359432X.2014.926890 |
0.634 |
|
| 2014 |
Woo SE, Chernyshenko OS, Stark SE, Conz G. Validity of six openness facets in predicting work behaviors: a meta-analysis. Journal of Personality Assessment. 96: 76-86. PMID 23795997 DOI: 10.1080/00223891.2013.806329 |
0.654 |
|
| 2014 |
Woo SE, Chernyshenko OS, Longley A, Zhang ZX, Chiu CY, Stark SE. Openness to Experience: its lower level structure, measurement, and cross-cultural equivalence. Journal of Personality Assessment. 96: 29-45. PMID 23795950 DOI: 10.1080/00223891.2013.806328 |
0.694 |
|
| 2014 |
Lee P, Stark S, Chernyshenko OS. Detecting aberrant responding on unidimensional Pairwise preference tests: An application of lz based on the Zinnes–Griggs ideal point IRT model Applied Psychological Measurement. 38: 391-403. DOI: 10.1177/0146621614526636 |
0.813 |
|
| 2014 |
Seybert J, Stark S, Chernyshenko OS. Detecting DIF With Ideal Point Models: A Comparison of Area and Parameter Difference Methods Applied Psychological Measurement. 38: 151-165. DOI: 10.1177/0146621613508306 |
0.702 |
|
| 2014 |
Stark S, Chernyshenko OS, Drasgow F, Nye CD, White LA, Heffner T, Farmer WL. From ABLE to TAPAS: A new generation of personality tests to support military selection and classification decisions Military Psychology. 26: 153-164. DOI: 10.1037/Mil0000044 |
0.788 |
|
| 2013 |
Guenole N, Chernyshenko OS, Stark S, Cockerill T, Drasgow F. More than a mirage: A large-scale assessment centre with more dimension variance than exercise variance Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology. 86: 5-21. DOI: 10.1111/J.2044-8325.2012.02063.X |
0.734 |
|
| 2013 |
Cho E, Tay L, Allen TD, Stark S. Identification of a dispositional tendency to experience work-family spillover Journal of Vocational Behavior. 82: 188-198. DOI: 10.1016/J.Jvb.2013.01.006 |
0.568 |
|
| 2012 |
Stark S, Chernyshenko OS, Drasgow F, White LA. Adaptive Testing With Multidimensional Pairwise Preference Items: Improving the Efficiency of Personality and Other Noncognitive Assessments Organizational Research Methods. 15: 463-487. DOI: 10.1177/1094428112444611 |
0.8 |
|
| 2012 |
Seybert J, Stark S. Iterative Linking With the Differential Functioning of Items and Tests (DFIT) Method Applied Psychological Measurement. 36: 494-515. DOI: 10.1177/0146621612445182 |
0.349 |
|
| 2012 |
Drasgow F, Chernyshenko OS, Stark S. Test Theory and Personality Measurement Oxford Handbook of Personality Assessment. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195366877.013.0004 |
0.755 |
|
| 2011 |
Stark S, Chernyshenko OS, Guenole N. Can subject matter experts' ratings of statement extremity be used to streamline the development of unidimensional pairwise preference scales? Organizational Research Methods. 14: 256-278. DOI: 10.1177/1094428109356712 |
0.742 |
|
| 2011 |
Stark S, Chernyshenko OS, Drasgow F. Constructing Fake-Resistant Personality Tests Using Item Response Theory: High-Stakes Personality Testing with Multidimensional Pairwise Preferences New Perspectives On Faking in Personality Assessment. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195387476.003.0061 |
0.788 |
|
| 2011 |
Stark S, Chernyshenko OS. Computerized adaptive testing with the zinnes and griggs pairwise preference ideal point model International Journal of Testing. 11: 231-247. DOI: 10.1080/15305058.2011.561459 |
0.716 |
|
| 2011 |
Stark S, Chernyshenko OS, Drasgow F, Lee WC, White LA, Young MC. Optimizing prediction of attrition with the U.S.Army's assessment of individual motivation (AIM) Military Psychology. 23: 180-201. DOI: 10.1080/08995605.2011.550234 |
0.744 |
|
| 2010 |
Drasgow F, Chernyshenko OS, Stark S. Improving the Measurement of Psychological Variables: Ideal Point Models Rock! Industrial and Organizational Psychology. 3: 515-520. DOI: 10.1111/J.1754-9434.2010.01284.X |
0.786 |
|
| 2010 |
Drasgow F, Chernyshenko OS, Stark S. 75 Years After Likert: Thurstone Was Right! Industrial and Organizational Psychology. 3: 465-476. DOI: 10.1111/J.1754-9434.2010.01273.X |
0.769 |
|
| 2009 |
Lopez Rivas GE, Stark S, Chernyshenko OS. The effects of referent item parameters on differential item functioning detection using the free baseline likelihood ratio test Applied Psychological Measurement. 33: 251-265. DOI: 10.1177/0146621608321760 |
0.729 |
|
| 2009 |
Chernyshenko OS, Stark S, Williams A. Latent Trait Theory Approach to Measuring Person-Organization Fit: Conceptual Rationale and Empirical Evaluation International Journal of Testing. 9: 358-380. DOI: 10.1080/15305050903351919 |
0.714 |
|
| 2009 |
Chernyshenko OS, Stark S, Prewett MS, Gray AA, Stilson FR, Tuttle MD. Normative scoring of multidimensional pairwise preference personality scales using IRT: Empirical comparisons with other formats Human Performance. 22: 105-127. DOI: 10.1080/08959280902743303 |
0.756 |
|
| 2007 |
Chernyshenko OS, Stark S, Drasgow F, Roberts BW. Constructing personality scales under the assumptions of an ideal point response process: toward increasing the flexibility of personality measures. Psychological Assessment. 19: 88-106. PMID 17371125 DOI: 10.1037/1040-3590.19.1.88 |
0.801 |
|
| 2007 |
Crede M, Chernyshenko OS, Stark S, Dalal RS, Bashshur M. Job satisfaction as mediator: An assessment of job satisfaction's position within the nomological network Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology. 80: 515-538. DOI: 10.1348/096317906X136180 |
0.633 |
|
| 2007 |
Chernyshenko OS, Stark S, Guenole N. Can the discretionary nature of certain criteria lead to differential prediction across cultural groups? International Journal of Selection and Assessment. 15: 175-184. DOI: 10.1111/J.1468-2389.2007.00379.X |
0.65 |
|
| 2006 |
Stark S, Chernyshenko OS, Drasgow F. Detecting differential item functioning with confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory: toward a unified strategy. The Journal of Applied Psychology. 91: 1292-306. PMID 17100485 DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.91.6.1292 |
0.789 |
|
| 2006 |
Stark S, Chernyshenko OS, Drasgow F, Williams BA. Examining assumptions about item responding in personality assessment: should ideal point methods be considered for scale development and scoring? The Journal of Applied Psychology. 91: 25-39. PMID 16435936 DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.91.1.25 |
0.803 |
|
| 2006 |
Stark S, Chernyshenko OS. Multistage testing: Widely or narrowly applicable? Applied Measurement in Education. 19: 257-260. DOI: 10.1207/S15324818Ame1903_6 |
0.632 |
|
| 2005 |
Stark S, Chernyshenko OS, Drasgow F. Identifying and Understanding the Effects of Unmotivated Examinees on Test Dimensionality Using Optimal Appropriateness Measurement International Journal of Testing. 5: 247-263. DOI: 10.1207/S15327574Ijt0503_4 |
0.767 |
|
| 2005 |
Stark S, Chernyshenko OS, Drasgow F. An IRT approach to constructing and scoring pairwise preference items involving stimuli on different dimensions: The multi-unidimensional pairwise-preference model Applied Psychological Measurement. 29: 184-203. DOI: 10.1177/0146621604273988 |
0.804 |
|
| 2005 |
Roberts BW, Chernyshenko OS, Stark S, Goldberg LR. The structure of conscientiousness: An empirical investigation based on seven major personality questionnaires Personnel Psychology. 58: 103-139. DOI: 10.1111/J.1744-6570.2005.00301.X |
0.694 |
|
| 2004 |
Stark S, Chernyshenko OS, Drasgow F. Examining the effects of differential item (functioning and differential) test functioning on selection decisions: when are statistically significant effects practically important? The Journal of Applied Psychology. 89: 497-508. PMID 15161408 DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.89.3.497 |
0.785 |
|
| 2004 |
Roberts BW, Bogg T, Walton KE, Chernyshenko OS, Stark SE. A lexical investigation of the lower-order structure of conscientiousness Journal of Research in Personality. 38: 164-178. DOI: 10.1016/S0092-6566(03)00065-5 |
0.657 |
|
| 2002 |
Stark S, Chernyshenko OS, Lancaster AR, Drasgow F, Fitzgerald LF. Toward Standardized Measurement of Sexual Harassment: Shortening the SEQ-DoD Using Item Response Theory Military Psychology. 14: 49-72. DOI: 10.1207/S15327876Mp1401_03 |
0.732 |
|
| 2002 |
Stark S, Drasgow F. An EM approach to parameter estimation for the Zinnes and Griggs paired comparison IRT model Applied Psychological Measurement. 26: 208-227. DOI: 10.1177/01421602026002007 |
0.609 |
|
| 2001 |
Chernyshenko OS, Stark S, Chan KY, Drasgow F, Williams B. Fitting Item Response Theory Models to Two Personality Inventories: Issues and Insights. Multivariate Behavioral Research. 36: 523-62. PMID 26822181 DOI: 10.1207/S15327906Mbr3604_03 |
0.792 |
|
| 2001 |
Borman WC, Buck DE, Hanson MA, Motowidlo SJ, Stark S, Drasgow F. An examination of the comparative reliability, validity, and accuracy of performance ratings made using computerized adaptive rating scales. The Journal of Applied Psychology. 86: 965-73. PMID 11596812 DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.86.5.965 |
0.605 |
|
| 2001 |
Stark S, Chernyshenko OS, Chan KY, Lee WC, Drasgow F. Effects of the testing situation on item responding: cause for concern. The Journal of Applied Psychology. 86: 943-53. PMID 11596810 DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.86.5.943 |
0.795 |
|
| 2001 |
Chernyshenko OS, Stark S, Chan KY. Investigating the hierarchical factor structure of the fifth edition of the 16PF: An application of the Schmid-Leiman orthogonalization procedure Educational and Psychological Measurement. 61: 290-302. DOI: 10.1177/00131640121971248 |
0.645 |
|
| Low-probability matches (unlikely to be authored by this person) |
| 2016 |
Chun S, Stark S, Kim ES, Chernyshenko OS. MIMIC Methods for Detecting DIF Among Multiple Groups: Exploring a New Sequential-Free Baseline Procedure Applied Psychological Measurement. 40: 486-499. DOI: 10.1177/0146621616659738 |
0.249 |
|
| 2016 |
Chun S, Harris A, Carrion M, Rojas E, Stark S, Lejuez C, Lechner WV, Bornovalova MA. A Psychometric Investigation of Gender Differences and Common Processes Across Borderline and Antisocial Personality Disorders. Journal of Abnormal Psychology. PMID 27808543 DOI: 10.1037/Abn0000220 |
0.198 |
|
| 2006 |
Cafri G, Thompson JK, Roehrig M, van den Berg P, Jacobsen PB, Stark S. An investigation of appearance motives for tanning: The development and evaluation of the Physical Appearance Reasons For Tanning Scale (PARTS) and its relation to sunbathing and indoor tanning intentions. Body Image. 3: 199-209. PMID 18089223 DOI: 10.1016/J.Bodyim.2006.05.002 |
0.196 |
|
| 2019 |
Wiernik BM, Bornovalova M, Stark SE, Ones DS. Constructs versus Measures in Personality and Other Domains: What Distinguishes Normal and Clinical? Industrial and Organizational Psychology. 12: 157-162. PMID 31892955 DOI: 10.1017/Iop.2019.31 |
0.174 |
|
| 2019 |
Cao C, Kim ES, Chen YH, Ferron J, Stark S. Exploring the Test of Covariate Moderation Effects in Multilevel MIMIC Models. Educational and Psychological Measurement. 79: 512-544. PMID 31105321 DOI: 10.1177/0013164418793490 |
0.174 |
|
| 2008 |
Guenole N, Chernyshenko S, Stark S, McGregor K, Ganesh S. Measuring stress reaction style: A construct validity investigation Personality and Individual Differences. 44: 250-262. DOI: 10.1016/J.PAID.2007.08.004 |
0.15 |
|
| 2023 |
Harrell PT, Brandon TH, Stark SE, Simmons VN, Barnett TE, Quinn GP, Chun S. Measuring vaping-related expectancies in young adults: Psychometric evaluation of the Electronic Nicotine Vaping Outcomes (ENVO) scale. Drug and Alcohol Dependence. 246: 109861. PMID 37028105 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2023.109861 |
0.135 |
|
| 2014 |
Mcabee ST, Oswald FL, King EB, Allen TD, Stark S, Converse PD, Eby LT, Leslie LM, Meyer RD, Rogelberg SG, Yang LQ. Including Science Advocacy in Industrial-Organizational Curriculum Industrial and Organizational Psychology. 7: 61-65. DOI: 10.1111/Iops.12107 |
0.131 |
|
| 2024 |
Tu N, Kumar LS, Joo S, Stark S. Linking Methods for Multidimensional Forced Choice Tests Using the Multi-Unidimensional Pairwise Preference Model. Applied Psychological Measurement. 48: 104-124. PMID 38585303 DOI: 10.1177/01466216241238741 |
0.12 |
|
| 2020 |
Nye CD, White LA, Drasgow F, Prasad J, Chernyshenko OS, Stark S. Examining personality for the selection and classification of soldiers: Validity and differential validity across jobs. Military Psychology : the Official Journal of the Division of Military Psychology, American Psychological Association. 32: 60-70. PMID 38536306 DOI: 10.1080/08995605.2019.1652482 |
0.12 |
|
| 2020 |
Nye CD, White LA, Horgen K, Drasgow F, Stark S, Chernyshenko OS. Predictors of attitudes and performance in U.S. Army recruiters: Does personality matter? Military Psychology : the Official Journal of the Division of Military Psychology, American Psychological Association. 32: 81-90. PMID 38536238 DOI: 10.1080/08995605.2019.1652486 |
0.12 |
|
| 2020 |
Thurston AJ, Campbell JS, Stark S. Modeling the Relationships Between Combat Experiences and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Factors Military Behavioral Health. 8: 201-211. DOI: 10.1080/21635781.2019.1702906 |
0.091 |
|
| 2023 |
Leybov V, Ross J, Smith SW, Ciardiello A, Maheshwari S, Caspers C, Wittman I, Kuhner C, Stark S, Conroy N. Piloting a novel medical student virtual discharge counseling process in the time of the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare. 1357633X221149227. PMID 36627176 DOI: 10.1177/1357633X221149227 |
0.042 |
|
| 2013 |
Srivatsa UN, Dinh H, Stark S. Computed tomography's crucial role in averting a life-threatening complication of lead extraction. Heart Rhythm. 10: 308-9. PMID 21952005 DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2011.09.065 |
0.032 |
|
| 2017 |
Stark S, Roberts DK, Tadros T, Longoria J, Krishnan SC. Protecting the right phrenic nerve during catheter ablation: Techniques and anatomical considerations. Heartrhythm Case Reports. 3: 199-204. PMID 28491802 DOI: 10.1016/j.hrcr.2016.08.012 |
0.011 |
|
| 2018 |
van Laar C, Verberkmoes NJ, van Es HW, Lewalter T, Dunnington G, Stark S, Longoria J, Hofman FH, Pierce CM, Kotecha D, van Putte BP. Thoracoscopic Left Atrial Appendage Clipping: A Multicenter Cohort Analysis. Jacc. Clinical Electrophysiology. 4: 893-901. PMID 30025689 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacep.2018.03.009 |
0.01 |
|
| Hide low-probability matches. |