Year |
Citation |
Score |
1990 |
Dyne AM, Humphreys MS, Bain JD, Pike R. Associative Interference Effects in Recognition and Recall Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 16: 813-824. DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.16.5.813 |
0.35 |
|
1989 |
Humphreys MS, Bain JD, Pike R. Different Ways to Cue a Coherent Memory System: A Theory for Episodic, Semantic, and Procedural Tasks Psychological Review. 96: 208-233. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.96.2.208 |
0.408 |
|
1989 |
Humphreys MS, Pike R, Bain JD, Tehan G. Global matching: A comparison of the SAM, Minerva II, Matrix, and TODAM models Journal of Mathematical Psychology. 33: 36-67. DOI: 10.1016/0022-2496(89)90003-5 |
0.465 |
|
1988 |
Pike R, Jackson K, Dalgleish L. Order and serial position effects in response time with multiple-item probe recognition. Memory & Cognition. 16: 220-31. PMID 3393083 DOI: 10.3758/Bf03197755 |
0.4 |
|
1988 |
Humphreys MS, Pike R, Bain JD, Tehan G. Using multilist designs to test for contextual reinstatement effects in recognition Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society. 26: 200-202. DOI: 10.3758/Bf03337286 |
0.392 |
|
1985 |
Pike R. Correction to Pike. Psychological Review. 92: 511-511. DOI: 10.1037/H0090457 |
0.311 |
|
1985 |
Pike R, Dalgleish L, Jackson K. Order effect in recognition latency for multiple-item probes Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition. 11: 248-261. DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.11.2.248 |
0.401 |
|
1984 |
Pike R. Comparison of convolution and matrix distributed memory systems for associative recall and recognition. Psychological Review. 91: 281-294. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.91.3.281 |
0.317 |
|
1983 |
Pike R, Jackson K. Further analysis of the Crist data on matching performance and the similarity structure of the stimulus set. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General. 112: 347-56. PMID 6225827 DOI: 10.1037//0096-3445.112.3.347 |
0.406 |
|
1978 |
Pike R, Ryder P. Multiple observations and latency functions: A further note on response latency in signal detection Psychological Review. 85: 48-52. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.85.1.48 |
0.689 |
|
1977 |
Pike R, Dalgleish L, Wright J. A multiple-observations model for response latency and the latencies of correct and incorrect responses in recognition memory Memory & Cognition. 5: 580-589. PMID 24203227 DOI: 10.3758/Bf03197403 |
0.494 |
|
1976 |
Pike R, Dalgleish L. The components of latency of response in two models for auditory detection with deadlines Attention Perception & Psychophysics. 19: 231-239. DOI: 10.3758/Bf03204175 |
0.495 |
|
1974 |
Pike R, McFarland K, Dalgleish L. Speed-accuracy tradeoff models for auditory detection with deadlines. Acta Psychologica. 38: 379-399. PMID 4432771 DOI: 10.1016/0001-6918(74)90042-0 |
0.526 |
|
1974 |
Ryder P, Pike R, Dalgleish L. What is the signal in signal detection Attention Perception & Psychophysics. 15: 479-482. DOI: 10.3758/Bf03199288 |
0.689 |
|
1973 |
Pike R. Response latency models for signal detection. Psychological Review. 80: 53-68. PMID 4689203 DOI: 10.1037/H0033871 |
0.576 |
|
1973 |
Pike R, Ryder P. Response latencies in the yes/no detection task: An assessment of two basic models Attention Perception & Psychophysics. 13: 224-232. DOI: 10.3758/Bf03214131 |
0.701 |
|
1973 |
Ryder P, Pike R. Criteria placement in detection‐implications for kogan and wallach's theory of risk‐taking Australian Journal of Psychology. 25: 211-216. DOI: 10.1080/00049537308255847 |
0.681 |
|
Show low-probability matches. |