Lisa L. Shu, Ph.D.
Affiliations: | Business Studies (Organizational Behavior) | Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, United States |
Area:
Social CognitionGoogle:
"Lisa Shu"Mean distance: 16.16 (cluster 15) | S | N | B | C | P |
Parents
Sign in to add mentorDaniel T. Gilbert | grad student | 2012 | Harvard | |
(Essays on Ethics: Antecedents and Consequences.) |
BETA: Related publications
See more...
Publications
You can help our author matching system! If you notice any publications incorrectly attributed to this author, please sign in and mark matches as correct or incorrect. |
Kristal AS, Whillans AV, Bazerman MH, et al. (2020) Signing at the beginning versus at the end does not decrease dishonesty. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America |
Shu LL, Mazar N, Gino F, et al. (2012) Signing at the beginning makes ethics salient and decreases dishonest self-reports in comparison to signing at the end Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 109: 15197-15200 |
Shu LL, Gino F. (2012) Sweeping dishonesty under the rug: How unethical actions lead to forgetting of moral rules Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 102: 1164-1177 |
Milkman KL, Mazza MC, Shu LL, et al. (2012) Policy bundling to overcome loss aversion: A method for improving legislative outcomes Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 117: 158-167 |
Shu LL, Gino F, Bazerman MH. (2011) Dishonest deed, clear conscience: When cheating leads to moral disengagement and motivated forgetting Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 37: 330-349 |
Tsay C, Shu LL, Bazerman MH. (2011) Naïveté and Cynicism in Negotiations and Other Competitive Contexts The Academy of Management Annals. 5: 495-518 |
Gino F, Shu LL, Bazerman MH. (2010) Nameless + harmless = blameless: When seemingly irrelevant factors influence judgment of (un)ethical behavior Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 111: 93-101 |
Morewedge CK, Shu LL, Gilbert DT, et al. (2009) Bad riddance or good rubbish? Ownership and not loss aversion causes the endowment effect Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 45: 947-951 |